RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   Time Slips and Dyno (https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-dyno-128/)
-   -   386 RWHP @ 13PSI, Turbo-NA w/GT4088R, Aux Bridge, etc. (https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-dyno-128/386-rwhp-%40-13psi-turbo-na-w-gt4088r-aux-bridge-etc-684320/)

Juiceh 10-01-07 12:28 PM


Originally Posted by Aaron Cake (Post 7298101)
I want to also have a "very" low boost setting for use in the rain or when traction could be an issue. Hence the lower PSI spring.

Screw that! Run high boost all the time!
https://www.rx7club.com/fdnewbie-imports-172/gb-racelogic-674843/

jacobcartmill 10-01-07 06:20 PM


Originally Posted by Aaron Cake (Post 7287899)
With each successive run we pulled a bit of fuel and gained between 10 and 20 HP every time. After approximately 6-8 runs (I lost count) the final number was 387 RWHP, 279 FT-LBS @ 13 PSI. A conservative estimate puts that right around 420 HP at the flywheel. Not half bad for an hour on the dyno on low boost. A/F ratios are in the mid 12s until about 5 PSI, falling to the mid 11s to 10 PSI, then low 11s to 13 PSI. Timing is still VERY conservative at 10 degrees. I could put a few degrees of timing into it right now and pick up a few more HP but I'd rather wait and borrow an EGT gauge (or buy a cheap one) before I start bumping timing too much.


10*@13psi is very low timing. of course i'm expecting you to take this with a grain of salt, as i'm just another guy posted in your thread on rx7club, but 10* is very low timing and i'm surprised the car is running as well as it is. that probably also explains the low tq numbers.
at 13psi i'd start from about 15* and add a degree or two with the EGT gauge.

what split are you running?

Aaron Cake 10-02-07 08:51 AM


Originally Posted by Terrh (Post 7385597)
nice results.
When I was making around that power level I was starting to have traction problems in 3rd, with an LSD...
If you plan on hitting up st. thomas this year and want to borrow my slicks just let me know, I see 11's in your future :)

I may be going to St. Thomas again on Friday as the weather looks good. It will probably be the last night with decent weather before the track closes. But of course, my car is 4 lug. :D


Originally Posted by t04tii (Post 7385842)
Why are HP and TQ crossing each other at 6k? HP is based on TQ and they always cross each other at 5,252. Something is up with how the dyno is setup...

They are two graphs from two different runs overlaid.


Originally Posted by Juiceh (Post 7385944)
Screw that! Run high boost all the time!
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=674843

It will be a cold day in hell before any of my cars gets traction control. :)


Originally Posted by jacobcartmill (Post 7387079)
10*@13psi is very low timing. of course i'm expecting you to take this with a grain of salt, as i'm just another guy posted in your thread on rx7club, but 10* is very low timing and i'm surprised the car is running as well as it is. that probably also explains the low tq numbers.
at 13psi i'd start from about 15* and add a degree or two with the EGT gauge.
what split are you running?

I looked at the datalog last night and I'm actually running a bit closer to 13 degrees. It would have fallen to 10 degrees at about 15 PSI or so.

In my experience, bridgeports just don't respond well to lots of timing. At low loads 30-35 degrees will make a pretty decent difference in mileage and driveability, but under boost I've not really seen a lot of gain by going past 15-16 degrees. Next time I dyno the car I'll be bumping the timing a bit at low boost, though probably keeping below 14 degrees under high boost...Pump gas friendly, and all that. :)

Honestly I don't know what the split is set to. I've not changed it from Microtech's base map. Probably something I should look at, now that you mention it...

TweakGames 10-02-07 02:41 PM


Originally Posted by t04tii (Post 7385842)
Why are HP and TQ crossing each other at 6k? HP is based on TQ and they always cross each other at 5,252. Something is up with how the dyno is setup...

HP=TQ * rpm/5,252.

:Wconfused

.

Aaron Cake 10-02-07 06:00 PM


Originally Posted by TweakGames (Post 7390065)
.

See above post. The graphs from two runs overlaid on top of each other showing max torque and max HP from both runs.

Honda600rr420 10-02-07 07:35 PM

any chace someone sell a turbo kit for an na?? i am very impressed with you vid and your work wish i lived around you id like to learn a thing or many from you

Sindregutt 10-07-07 12:43 PM

Nice build Aaron cake!
Never ever think about buying a Kaaz diff :P If you do it`ll go from daily driver to trackday ONLY..
Im running a TIal wg with a .45bar spring and the profecII boost controller and it works really well.. Nice to have low power when its really wet :)

ddub 10-08-07 08:31 AM

Congrats Aaron.

Aaron Cake 10-08-07 09:53 AM

Made some 1/4 mile runs on Friday. Best run was about 13.12 @ 176 with the tires spinning 3/4 of the way down the track. Traction remains the biggest problem but at least I've got the launch figured out. I'll post some timeslips when I feel like scanning a few of them and have the video edited...

HAI-TEK7 10-08-07 10:12 AM


Originally Posted by Aaron Cake (Post 7398707)
Made some 1/4 mile runs on Friday. Best run was about 13.12 @ 176 with the tires spinning 3/4 of the way down the track. Traction remains the biggest problem but at least I've got the launch figured out. I'll post some timeslips when I feel like scanning a few of them and have the video edited...

HOLY SHNIKEYS BATMAN!! 176!!

At first i thought it was 176 MPH!!!.....had to do a double take, forgot you in Canada

Congrats on an awesome build.

FYI, 176 KMH = 109.3 MPH

PvillKnight7 10-08-07 01:16 PM

with slicks, your front diff mount is going to rip unless you weld it solid or install a pinion snubber

orion84gsl 10-13-07 05:45 PM

Everyone needs to stop questioning Aaron, he knows what hes doing, and he knows something is going to give, and he's is prepared for to deal with it. When do I get a ride in this monster?

Aaron Cake 10-20-07 07:26 PM

Here's the video from two weeks ago at the track:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOPXWf7_LQ8

Crazyness...Loosing traction in 4th gear at 170 KM/H is a bit scary...

TweakGames 10-20-07 07:34 PM

what?! that cant be right ... 13.8?!

PvillKnight7 10-20-07 09:16 PM

Shift faster! I thought your setup was supposed to be fast...

Aaron Cake 10-21-07 09:58 AM


Originally Posted by TweakGames (Post 7439970)
what?! that cant be right ... 13.8?!

Timing mistake. Seems to happen fairly often at Sparta. It's sort of funny sometimes when the numbers are totally skewed. I have some timeslips from when the car was NA that show 14.xx at 70 MPH. :)


Originally Posted by PvillKnight7 (Post 7440177)
Shift faster! I thought your setup was supposed to be fast...

The car breaks traction in every gear but 5th so there's not a lot of point in hammering the shifts. It's more then a but unnerving putting the car sideways going into 4th at ~170 KM/H, and a little unsafe as well. So until I get an LSD and some rubber it's enough just to keep the car on the track. :) The car is a mid/low 11 second car once I have traction...

TweakGames 10-21-07 06:48 PM

so aaron You have done a lot with the 6 ports now .... Would you mind if I pick you brain for a bit of what you would recommend?

I am going to be rebuilding my spare origional NA but the more I think about it the more I think of it as a re-create. Since I am going new housing and possibly new rotors if I can't find some REALLY good low compression s4 rotors, most of the important stuff is new. I am going to be using the stock turbo and turbo manifold.

Anyways I was wondering what your thoughts were on the intake. I was thinking either I could keep my port matched turbo LIM and corresponding uim and suck, or I could do a spacer like you did on your first build and run the NA lim and intake. Do you think it even matters or its noticeable? Would having working 5/6 port actuators help build boost at all at lower RPM? I will be using turbo primary ports, and na secondary + aux.

Thanks, just wondering your opinions. I am only going to be doing a street port, nothing big like yours. Although I will have a haltech.

Would you consider a street ported 6 port turbo application better or at any special advantage without the 5/6 ports over a street ported 4 port application?

ZAN_TUNING 10-22-07 02:11 AM

176 kph is only like 110 mph right? either your car is 4000 lbs or your not making the power you dyno'd.. with the little bit of spin your getting the 13.2 seems about right. i really like your setup but something is off here

gxl90rx7 10-22-07 08:09 AM


Originally Posted by Intense_Motorsports (Post 7443712)
176 kph is only like 110 mph right? either your car is 4000 lbs or your not making the power you dyno'd.. with the little bit of spin your getting the 13.2 seems about right. i really like your setup but something is off here

haha yeah its called no traction because of the n/a open diff!

Aaron Cake 10-22-07 09:47 AM


Originally Posted by Intense_Motorsports (Post 7443712)
176 kph is only like 110 mph right? either your car is 4000 lbs or your not making the power you dyno'd.. with the little bit of spin your getting the 13.2 seems about right. i really like your setup but something is off here

I have no traction until 5th gear. Watch the video and listen to the tires spin down the entire track during the last two runs. During the last run, watch the position of the car in the shadow and then in the light. Notice how it moved from one side of the lane to another? That's because I had to get out of the throttle because the rear broke free going into 4th gear. :D

Next upgrade is an LSD...


Originally Posted by TweakGames (Post 7442304)
so aaron You have done a lot with the 6 ports now .... Would you mind if I pick you brain for a bit of what you would recommend?

It would have been nice if this was posted in the proper forum, but go ahead...


Anyways I was wondering what your thoughts were on the intake. I was thinking either I could keep my port matched turbo LIM and corresponding uim and suck, or I could do a spacer like you did on your first build and run the NA lim and intake. Do you think it even matters or its noticeable? Would having working 5/6 port actuators help build boost at all at lower RPM? I will be using turbo primary ports, and na secondary + aux.
Use the TII intake.

There will be no room to use the aux port stuff unless you make a custom exhaust manifold.


Thanks, just wondering your opinions. I am only going to be doing a street port, nothing big like yours. Although I will have a haltech.
Stock turbo is way too small for a stock ported 6 port engine, let alone something with a street port.


Would you consider a street ported 6 port turbo application better or at any special advantage without the 5/6 ports over a street ported 4 port application?
More port area.

RotaryEvolution 10-22-07 03:52 PM

nice work on the setup Aaron, glad to see it finally up and running well.

just a warning at pushing 17+PSI on pump fuel, make sure you are at least running an auxiliary injectant, i'd hate to see the motor go bye bye due to detonation, especially a high compression n/a motor as the internal temps will skyrocket at those boost levels. 13PSI on that turbo is barely dipping into it's efficiency range as well, plan to have some real fun around 20PSI and grab the "oh shit" handles at 25+

for those questioning the 1/4 time, ask Aaron for his 60' times, i bet none were lower than a 2.3 second run, i had similar issues with my car and could hardly push further than a 13.2 due to wheel hop and spin. stickies and a LSD make a world of difference in 1/4 mile times.

slo 10-22-07 04:15 PM

Suspension makes such a huge difference. When my car had about 275 WHP running shitty tires with an open diff on stock cosmo twin turbo's (13b-re), I was running 14.5 with massive wheel spin through first, some in second, but nothing like whats described here.

Same power just an LSD, much better tires, fresh suspension (AGX eibach bushings nothing to aggressive), and a pinion snubber (best 10$ spent on the car) It got into the high 12's on the first and only run I made in that configuration before blowing a turbo with a still shitty 60' time.

RockLobster 10-24-07 06:42 PM

This straight line stuff confuses me.

(Nice work, that was a ton of fun to watch) :)

Shainiac 10-31-07 11:20 PM

Just an interesting tidbit, but this years Grassroots motorspors $2006 winner was a 350SBC-clad FC still using the stock NA rear and running 11s on slicks.

PvillKnight7 11-01-07 09:42 AM


Originally Posted by Shainiac (Post 7471673)
Just an interesting tidbit, but this years Grassroots motorspors $2006 winner was a 350SBC-clad FC still using the stock NA rear and running 11s on slicks.

Now thats a vid I have to see to beleive

Shainiac 11-01-07 12:57 PM


Originally Posted by PvillKnight7 (Post 7472448)
Now thats a vid I have to see to beleive


Buy the magazing :)

If you dont know what the $200X Challenge, independent races get a budget of dollars per year. ei: 2006A.D. = $2,006 to work with. Thats to buy the car, modify it, and rape it in autocross and drag, and being disected by a group of techies to get engineering points. The $2006 winner was a 88(I think) NA converted to a 350 and autobox.


IF you NEED proof, these should suffice

Drag Launches http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE1lu6eveWo
Autocross http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75gYftQpy2Y

PvillKnight7 11-01-07 01:46 PM

cool vids but i still dont see the 11s 1/4 mile with an open rear...

Shainiac 11-02-07 12:02 AM

Heres Grassroots Motorsports page with the event results.

http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/new...006-challenge/

If you look at the first contestant (first place 88 RX7) It says 10.926 seconds in the drag time column.

My mistake on the videos, that is video of a car from THIS years GRM challenge. The car that I am speaking of is a two-tone blue white S4. That car was featured in the Sept 2007 issue (iIIRC) and is even on the cover

Here is a picture of that car.

http://clemsonscc.com/Gallery/media....61031175058612

If you want me to scan a copy of the article where the owner mentions retaining the original NA rear, I can this weekend.

classicauto 11-02-07 08:26 AM


Originally Posted by Shainiac (Post 7475003)
If you want me to scan a copy of the article where the owner mentions retaining the original NA rear, I can this weekend.

[sarcasm]Don't you know thats blasphemy?? Once the N/A rear hear's people talking about over 160whp, it gets antsy and starts looking for ways to off itself. You'll never run real power through an N/A rear!! :rofl: :lol:[/sarcasm]

PvillKnight7 11-02-07 09:22 AM

n/a doesnt mean open rear. some n/a came stock with a lsd, not an open rear.

Aaron Cake 11-02-07 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by Karack (Post 7445427)
nice work on the setup Aaron, glad to see it finally up and running well.
just a warning at pushing 17+PSI on pump fuel, make sure you are at least running an auxiliary injectant, i'd hate to see the motor go bye bye due to detonation, especially a high compression n/a motor as the internal temps will skyrocket at those boost levels. 13PSI on that turbo is barely dipping into it's efficiency range as well, plan to have some real fun around 20PSI and grab the "oh shit" handles at 25+

I know that "AI" is the current fad on these forums, but I think it will be a cold day in hell before I attach any "bottles" (which includes nitrous) to my car. :) In my opinion, once you add something that is depleted during hard driving (aux injection, nitrous, CO2 sprays, etc.) then the car is no longer a street car. Obviously few others share that view.

I'm not entirely worried about raising the boost. Every turbo engine that I've been involved with for the last 5 years (except one) has been high compression and there have been no issues with high boost. The key more then anything is keeping the A/F ratios below 11 once you get past 15 PSI or so (depending on turbo) and being conservative with the timing (around 12 degrees max at high boost).

There's really no intention of running 20-25 PSI. That's just crazy. :) I expect around 17-18 PSI will be all I'll ever need.


for those questioning the 1/4 time, ask Aaron for his 60' times, i bet none were lower than a 2.3 second run, i had similar issues with my car and could hardly push further than a 13.2 due to wheel hop and spin. stickies and a LSD make a world of difference in 1/4 mile times.
I'll check my timeslips at lunch today, because now I'm curious.

Aaron Cake 11-02-07 02:46 PM

Best 60 foot time of the night was 2.13.

shm21284 03-12-08 08:53 PM


Originally Posted by Aaron Cake (Post 7310600)
Bingo. Either way I need to fill a diff with aftermarket parts so there's no point in starting with the TII pumpkin over the NA unit.

Except for the fact that the t2 rear end is 1" larger in diameter.

I too have abused plenty of drivelines and have witnessed components in the N/A rear end break. One specific example was the stub shafts breaking during a drag launch on street tires. The engine powering this breakage was a 185rwhp supercharged 13b. Ultimately, the result was due to a fatigue failure, and the "straw that broke the camels back" was the drag launch. However, a t2 rear end, with larger diameter ring, case, and stub shafts will withstand more fatigue and higher torque levels.

bigdv519 03-12-08 10:30 PM

Good job, get that thing in the 12's already.

shm21284 03-15-08 04:46 PM

Your trap speeds (around 110 mph) reflect roughly 300 rwhp. Also, the video seems to show very little wheel spin, except when you shifted into 4th gear, where some wheel spin happened. It didn't appear that you had spin all the way through 4th gear.

gxl90rx7 03-15-08 07:07 PM


Originally Posted by shm21284 (Post 7981528)
Your trap speeds (around 110 mph) reflect roughly 300 rwhp. Also, the video seems to show very little wheel spin, except when you shifted into 4th gear, where some wheel spin happened. It didn't appear that you had spin all the way through 4th gear.

im making 300rwhp, and there is no way i would even chirp the tires in 4th. i barely spin in 2nd

Aaron Cake 03-16-08 10:20 AM


Originally Posted by shm21284 (Post 7971380)
Except for the fact that the t2 rear end is 1" larger in diameter.

Yes, there's that as well.


I too have abused plenty of drivelines and have witnessed components in the N/A rear end break. One specific example was the stub shafts breaking during a drag launch on street tires. The engine powering this breakage was a 185rwhp supercharged 13b. Ultimately, the result was due to a fatigue failure, and the "straw that broke the camels back" was the drag launch. However, a t2 rear end, with larger diameter ring, case, and stub shafts will withstand more fatigue and higher torque levels.
I actually saw (well, I didn't see with my own eyes but I got the phone call a few hours later...) the same thing happen on a TII diff. The car was running a smallish TD07 on a half bridge with a set of slicks out back. Sheared stub shaft right off which destroyed the half shaft and I believe the diff casing.

I won't be running non-street tires at the 1/4 mile so the traction limiter will always be the relativly small tires.


Originally Posted by shm21284 (Post 7981528)
Your trap speeds (around 110 mph) reflect roughly 300 rwhp. Also, the video seems to show very little wheel spin, except when you shifted into 4th gear, where some wheel spin happened. It didn't appear that you had spin all the way through 4th gear.

The car made at 387 RWHP on a Dynocom dyno as mentioned earlier in the thread. It's hard to get any sort of good times with virtually no traction, as I'm sure you know. The launches were soft, there was no burnout and at least one wheel was spinning down most of the track. :)

Honestly with the open diff I'd say that it's a bit dangerous to drive the car. Any more then 30% throttle and the rear swings out. As soon as the engine is above 5K one or both tires are spinning.

I'll likely be picking up an LSD soon.

skatingsamurai 03-16-08 07:48 PM

dude, get a hair cut, : D. nice job at the dyno!

Shainiac 03-16-08 09:43 PM

I would definately suggest going with the TII rear end. Not only is the ring bigger, but the stub shafts and axles are sturdier.
Heres what wheelhop did to my NA OPEN rear end.
My front diff mount was broken, so this isnt a common occurance, but I wasnt even launching that hard.
Just happened to be on sticky pavement. Wheel hop is a bitch.

I believe you have a pinion snubber, correct Aaron?
That should help greatly in reducing the chance of something like that happening.
But if you do a lot of drag racing, its something that could happen.


http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d8.../RX7/diff1.jpg
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d8.../RX7/diff2.jpg

ForsakenRX7 03-17-08 07:45 PM

Aaron, its probably already been answered but, is your whole drivetrain n/a? tranny, rear, clutch and all?










Nevermind, I see that it is.

shm21284 03-19-08 07:23 PM

same thing that happened to my buddies. Not that it can't happen to a t2 rear end, but the t2 rear end is much more stout. It was designed for the extra torque provided by the turbo engine, but hey, what do mazda engineers know??

That stub shaft got owned

FC3Sdrift 03-23-08 09:17 AM

you guys are missing a key point your gearing could be slowing you down alot
the TII has a 4.10 final drive ratio which isn't crazy aggressive but what is the n/a ....i thought it had a 3.9 FD????????? i don't know what the actual numbers are? plus look at the differenace in the gearing in the transmission's,

my mx-3 for example only has 200hp at the crank stock....maybe pushin 225hp with my mods but it has a 4.38 final drive weighs just under 2700lbs without me
runs consistant low 14's @ 98mph (14.18-14.44) at spartaand thats with bald tires and some "issues" the exact same cars with a 4.10 trannny has troubles breaking out of the 15's
your mph doesn't show very much tire spinning.....when you spin the hell outta your tires down the track your end mph is usually alot higher but slower times and your ET and mph's are pretty close to one another...which to me says its not so much of a traction issue as it is a gearing one.
i would hate to see tina violated by my mx-3 and a 75 shot of nos hahaha

oh aaron p.s i have a 86 base with 117 000 kms i could sell you the tranny and open diff for $200 for it all or $100 for either one


toss some OS Giken close ratio gears and an aftermarket lsd and you should be good to go

aaron your not the only one with traction issues...just keep her pinned to the floor and hold the f*ck on!
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...da013d3e80.htm

Aaron Cake 03-23-08 09:52 AM

If I blow up the NA diff (which I am certain I will do at one point), I really don't care. I think the point has been completely missed here. I would rather spend time/money modifying what Mazda put on the car then simply replace with TII stuff. Maybe I will end up with a TII diff, maybe not. Maybe I will put aftermarket parts in the NA diff and have custom shafts made, maybe not. It all really depends.

I would appreciate it if people could get off the NA vs. TII parts direction that this thread has taken and keep it on topic. I went through all this stuff a lot of years ago with the first turbo-NA setup and am not keen on repeating the same old arguments.

The current diff plan is to simply pick up an LSD and bolt it in. It's likely I'll swap in an aftermarket center section since I plan to replace all the bearings anyway. At that time, the components (stub shafts, etc.) can be shotpeened and cryo treated.

FC3Sdrift 03-23-08 11:09 AM

andy'sautowreckers has a low kms gxl lsd diff they were gonna sell me for 100 bucks
i think it was around 135kms in the silver rx7

totallimmortal 03-24-08 05:00 PM


Originally Posted by shm21284 (Post 7971380)
I too have abused plenty of drivelines and have witnessed components in the N/A rear end break. One specific example was the stub shafts breaking during a drag launch on street tires. The engine powering this breakage was a 185rwhp supercharged 13b. Ultimately, the result was due to a fatigue failure, and the "straw that broke the camels back" was the drag launch. However, a t2 rear end, with larger diameter ring, case, and stub shafts will withstand more fatigue and higher torque levels.


Exactly I have no idea why aarons NA driveline parts don't break. I have talked to him about it before and am not trying to argue the point with him as he seems to be happy. But i've gone through two rears and one was an open diff, and two trannys, everything had plenty of good clean oil and was in good shape when i started with it. The parts simpley could not handle my launches, my best recorded 60ft was a 2.1 but i know i've done better. I've broken stub shafts in the rear and grenaded 1st and 2nd gears in trannys. But just to show i'm not knocking him i am going to be using NA parts on my car with a turbo, I don't think i'll be lauching on slick with those parts tho

davemo 03-24-08 08:24 PM

i bet that car is a BLAST after 3500 lol! you're right that torque curve is pretty freakin' awesome!

i'm sure i'd probably have to bring plenty of extra pairs of pants to drive it

(because i'd keep soiling them)

(with joy)

rotarymandan 04-22-08 07:21 PM

:icon_tup: Your custom UIM is awesome.

Randomandy12 04-23-08 03:12 PM

you know what I think you should run the na driveline until it blows, then run the tII driveline until that blows and tell us which one you had more fun blowing up and which took longer, then you should crank the boost up to 30 and see if that will make the na motor pop because it obviously can't handle a turbo. and when that happens you should put in a V8, because their better anyway


just kidding nice car, sweet build, I'm jealous.. my car doesn't even run :(

Eric 05-06-08 05:56 AM

wow man, awesome numbers for the setup, congrats!

Nismo Convert86 05-24-08 02:34 PM

Ah yes, wheel spin through 4th, reminds me of my stock turbo, and IC'd car running 15.0 @ 101mph with 195's in the rear, it was a sleeper when it would hook!

Looks good Aaron


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands