Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs
Sponsored by:

1990 NA Mustang Dyno with 200k km motor.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-06, 01:06 PM
  #1  
Spoolin'
Tenured Member 20 Years
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
pd_day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miss.
Posts: 2,787
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
1990 NA on Mustang Dyno with 200k km motor.

Hi guys,

I finally dyno'ed my car after a few mods.
Last year, I dynoed 142rwhp on a dynojet.

Mods were:
Cone intake
stock exhaust
Crane CDI ignition
SR motorsport lighten flywheel
SAFC tuning
Pinapple racing sleeves.

This year, I dyno'ed 151 rwhp on a mustang dyno. ( I think the correlation on dyno jet vs mustang dyno is around 10% lower on the mustang)

Mods were:
Same as above, but with

SDJ header
Borla XR-1 midpipe
2.5 inch exhaust
SAFC re-tuned.




A/F was at around 13. I think if I leaned out more to 13.5 ish, I'll pick up another 2 -3 hp or so. What do you guys think?

Before the dyno, I also compression tested my engine

Front : 9.3 / 9.3 / 9.3
Rear: 8.7 / 8.9 / 8.7

Not too shabby for 200k km (125k miles) on the motor.
Attached Thumbnails 1990 NA Mustang Dyno with 200k km motor.-dyno.jpg  

Last edited by pd_day; 06-05-06 at 01:35 PM.
Old 06-05-06, 01:11 PM
  #2  
He who smokes bitches

 
cool_as_crap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: El Dorado County
Posts: 3,452
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sweet.
what is your torque like?
Old 06-05-06, 01:16 PM
  #3  
Spoolin'
Tenured Member 20 Years
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
pd_day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miss.
Posts: 2,787
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by cool_as_crap
sweet.
what is your torque like?
It's 113lb/tq

The blue line on the graph.
Old 06-05-06, 10:00 PM
  #4  
Former Rx7 *****

 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
weak. You need turbo
Old 06-06-06, 12:33 AM
  #5  
Tear you apart
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,882
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
I expected alot more out of the SDJ header.
Old 06-06-06, 12:54 AM
  #6  
Spoolin'
Tenured Member 20 Years
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
pd_day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miss.
Posts: 2,787
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Jager
I expected alot more out of the SDJ header.

With the Solo1 correction factor of 0.830 on Mustang dyno, that works out to around 187hp at the crank ...

That's 27 hp over stock with just intake, exhaust and tuning .... pretty good in my books.

I would be interested to see how the graph of a car with RB header would look like comparing to one with my SDJ.

BTW, of the few cars I compared with that had the RB header on, I would pull on them at high end all the time.
Old 06-06-06, 12:57 AM
  #7  
Tear you apart
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,882
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Hmmhm, I was just told that the SDJ header was something sick or unreal. I think I had too high of expectations.

Looks great. Future mods planned?
Old 06-06-06, 01:07 AM
  #8  
Spoolin'
Tenured Member 20 Years
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
pd_day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miss.
Posts: 2,787
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Jager
Hmmhm, I was just told that the SDJ header was something sick or unreal. I think I had too high of expectations.

Looks great. Future mods planned?

That's alright, I think the advantage lies in the wieght of the header.
SDJ is stainless steel while RB is mid steel, you are saving 10lbs of so already.

Also, I had the RB header before, comparing the 2, I feel I have more tq thru out the powerband and slightly more power up top with the SDJ.

Anyhoo, it's a little engine sucking in 1.3L of air ...... if there is a few hp difference between 2 setups, it's pretty huge already ... =0
Old 06-06-06, 01:08 AM
  #9  
Tear you apart
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,882
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by pd_day
That's alright, I think the advantage lies in the wieght of the header.
SDJ is stainless steel while RB is mid steel, you are saving 10lbs of so already.

Also, I had the RB header before, comparing the 2, I feel I have more tq thru out the powerband and slightly more power up top with the SDJ.

Anyhoo, it's a little engine sucking in 1.3L of air ...... if there is a few hp difference between 2 setups, it's pretty huge already ... =0
Ah, that I did not know. What's the next plan?
Old 06-06-06, 01:10 AM
  #10  
Spoolin'
Tenured Member 20 Years
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
pd_day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miss.
Posts: 2,787
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
I might port and polish the intake manifold runners...

Don't know if that'll give a good increase thou .....
Old 06-06-06, 09:41 AM
  #11  
Spoolin'
Tenured Member 20 Years
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
pd_day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Miss.
Posts: 2,787
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Cheers!
weak. You need turbo
No, I should follow in John's foot steps and do a LS7 swap.
Old 06-06-06, 01:02 PM
  #12  
Now With 10th AE Fun!

iTrader: (1)
 
1SWEET7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sweet. I was expecting a little more with the SDJ header too. I really want to get my car dynoed and get my SAFC II tuned.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
05-18-18 02:44 PM
rx7inoregon
Old School and Other Rotary
5
10-01-15 12:44 PM



Quick Reply: 1990 NA Mustang Dyno with 200k km motor.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM.