Tire recomendations
#1
Thread Starter
Darkside Performance
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, Va
Tire recomendations
Mounting Enekei RPF1 18x9.5 fronts and 18x10 rears on the FD. I need some tires now but Im having a problem picking out a good set. I dont want to spend more than 1K for a set of tires and I would like to run 255/35 front 265/35 rears. Any recommendations as to what tires to get? BTW my car is just my weekend toy that I will drive to work once in a while and take to the track maybe twice a year.
#3
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 538
From: Another state obliterated by leftists
Hankook RS3, Bridgestone RE-11, or the Dunlops mentioned above.
Also, in spring, Michelin SuperSports come out. Better grip than the Sport Cups, and much higher than PS or PS2s.
Also, in spring, Michelin SuperSports come out. Better grip than the Sport Cups, and much higher than PS or PS2s.
#7
I agree with all. My favorite are the starspecs as Rich mentioned. I ran the Dunlop Direzza Z1 Starspec 275/35/18 on CCW classics 18x10 in 2008 for approximately 20 track days and 3-5000 track miles and they just would not give up. I bought them when I first got home from Afghanistan to shake the rust off/make sure I hadn't picked up any bad habits before going back to R Compounds. When I took them off, they still had roughly 60% tread left. They were more consistent on track than any of the other extreme summer street tires I'd driven on. Did fairly well on the street as well. I also like the Nitto NT05's. Another cheap tire that I believe should be available in your size are the Falken Azensis RT615K. The older RT615 were a good tire, but would get a little greasy during sustained use(20 minute track sessions in July in Alabama towards the end of the day)
Trending Topics
#8
Thread Starter
Darkside Performance
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, Va
The tire with the best rating and value to mee seem to be the Hankook Ventus V12, which I understand doesnt hold any value off the opinions of people on here, or at least to me because people here actually track their cars. Most the people that do reviews on the website are people that daily drive their vehicles and just complain of road noise or tread wear. Either way they have the highest rating and come in right around my price range. I really would like to fit a 275 in the rear but I dont know if I can do that without fender rolling which is something I do NOT want to do.
#11
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
I had Kumho XS on a set of Fikses for awhile, and they weren't too shabby in the dry.... beware the rain though. I can't recommend them over the Star Specs. FWIW, I also didn't like the way they looked on the wheels.
The ventus v12 have received good reviews much like the newer Continentals, but for the kind of driving I do I wouldn't even consider either. Esp if you plan to make some serious torque with that camaro motor
I ran 18x9.5 +45 RPF1 with 265/35 Hankook RS2s (front and rear) briefly and had zero issues with clearance on stock fenders. i sold them to a fellow FD owner and he's been very happy with their performance and fitment AFAIK.
I still say the Dunlops, in a loud authoritative voice
The ventus v12 have received good reviews much like the newer Continentals, but for the kind of driving I do I wouldn't even consider either. Esp if you plan to make some serious torque with that camaro motor
I ran 18x9.5 +45 RPF1 with 265/35 Hankook RS2s (front and rear) briefly and had zero issues with clearance on stock fenders. i sold them to a fellow FD owner and he's been very happy with their performance and fitment AFAIK.
I still say the Dunlops, in a loud authoritative voice
#13
I run those sizes in federal 595 RSR. I really like them a lot. Good grip 140 treadwear tire thats over $300 less than a set of the star specs in same size.
http://www.citytireonline.com/Federal595RS.htm
I have heard nothing but great things about the star specs, if they are in your budget im sure you wont be disappointed.
http://www.citytireonline.com/Federal595RS.htm
I have heard nothing but great things about the star specs, if they are in your budget im sure you wont be disappointed.
#15
http://www.hankooktireusa.com/Psearc...Num=1&subNum=2
SizeLoadSpeedMeas. RimRim Width RangeODSWTWTDRevs/MileSidewall TypeMaxAirLoad
225/45ZR15
87W7.5 7.0-8.523.08.98.09.0903SBL511,201 225/50ZR16
92W7.0 6.0-8.024.99.18.09.0834SBL511,389 205/55ZR16
91W6.5 5.5-7.524.98.47.59.0835SBL511,356 245/40ZR17
91W8.5 8.0-9.524.79.89.19.0840SBL511,356 255/40ZR17 XL
98W9.0 8.5-10.025.010.29.09.0830SBL501,653 215/45ZR17
87W7.0 7.0-8.024.68.47.99.0843SBL511,477 225/45ZR17 XL
94W7.5 7.0-8.525.08.98.09.0832SBL501,477 235/45ZR17
94W8.0 7.5-9.025.49.38.69.0819SBL511,477 255/35ZR18
90W9.0 8.5-10.025.010.29.59.0831SBL511,323 265/35ZR18 XL
97W9.5 9.0-10.525.310.79.49.0821SBL501,609 275/35ZR18
95W9.5 9.0-11.025.610.910.29.0813SBL511,521 285/35ZR18 XL
101W10.0 9.5-11.025.911.410.19.0803SBL501,819 225/40ZR18
88W8.0 7.5-9.025.19.18.49.0828SBL511,235 235/40ZR18
91W8.5 8.0-9.525.49.58.89.0818SBL511,356 245/40ZR18 XL
97W8.5 8.0-9.525.79.88.79.0808SBL501,609 305/30ZR19 XL
102W11.0 10.5-11.526.312.311.49.0791SBL501,874 235/35ZR19
87W8.5 8.0-9.525.59.58.89.0816SBL511,201 225/40ZR19
89W8.0 7.5-9.026.19.18.09.0796SBL501,279 245/40ZR19
94W8.5 8.0-9.526.79.89.19.0777SBL501,477 Technical Data subject to change without prior notice.
#16
+1, if you want to spend less than 1k I would also recommend getting used tires off of ebay from a reputable seller. Used tires are usually significantly cheaper if you look for a set with around 7/32 to 9/32 tread left.
#18
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Both are old technology tires, suited for drivers that aren't very concerned with ultimate grip. I'd never recommend either for an FD unless the car was at near-stock power levels and was strictly street driven .
#19
There's a reason you don't hear about either on a track
Both are old technology tires, suited for drivers that aren't very concerned with ultimate grip. I'd never recommend either for an FD unless the car was at near-stock power levels and was strictly street driven .
Both are old technology tires, suited for drivers that aren't very concerned with ultimate grip. I'd never recommend either for an FD unless the car was at near-stock power levels and was strictly street driven .
#20
This guy gives a pretty in depth review on an evo board:
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-tir...l-595rs-r.html
he states that the 595RSR spanked the same size NT05 on a track with a 370whp evo.
#21
Another vote for the Dunlop Star Specs. If you can tolerate the roar around 30-40 mph and above 70 mph, they deliver an unmatched level of performance per dollar. If you've never tried an Extreme Performance Summer tire, you really don't know what you're missing.
#22
There's a reason you don't hear about either on a track
Both are old technology tires, suited for drivers that aren't very concerned with ultimate grip. I'd never recommend either for an FD unless the car was at near-stock power levels and was strictly street driven .
Both are old technology tires, suited for drivers that aren't very concerned with ultimate grip. I'd never recommend either for an FD unless the car was at near-stock power levels and was strictly street driven .
#24
I am running the same exact set up wheel wise as you....same offsets and everything. I will be running 265/35/18 front and rear. I am running Kumho XS tires....as I don't drive the car in rain.
I bought the tires off ebay brand new for $608 shipped.
I bought the tires off ebay brand new for $608 shipped.