RPF1 17x9.5 +38 offset all around?
#26
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
looks like the cyberevo is on the stretch bandwagon due to higher grip and more predictable traction/breakaway/steering input.
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Bump - could I run a 17x10 38 in back with 275s and stock, unrolled fenders? Sounds like it works with the 9.5 38s but I'm wondering if the 10s would be too much.
#28
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks. For some reason I was thinking offset was determined relative to one edge of the wheel or another but now I'm remembering it's from the centerline. So why is the standard rec to do the 9.5s in back? Jist being conservative or are the 17x10 RPF1s fairly new?
#30
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
I fit a 18x11.5" +41.7mm offset and have just a little bit of room between the trailing arm and wheel. I wouldn't run more than an 11.5" tire though.
#31
Full Member
You have me confused. I would go with the 10's and 255/40/17 tire. that is just me. I don't see any problems with fitting that wheel either, plenty of room for it.
I fit a 18x11.5" +41.7mm offset and have just a little bit of room between the trailing arm and wheel. I wouldn't run more than an 11.5" tire though.
I fit a 18x11.5" +41.7mm offset and have just a little bit of room between the trailing arm and wheel. I wouldn't run more than an 11.5" tire though.