Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

Kuhmo Exsta 712, need your comments good and bad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-03 | 07:09 PM
  #1  
overkill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Kuhmo Exsta 712, need your comments good and bad

Thinking of getting the 712's. Need your personal thoughts on them - good and bad. Thanks!
Old 03-27-03 | 08:34 PM
  #2  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Bad. Tread separation when shod on 400-hp SVT Cobra Mustangs...Bad Bad Bad...
Old 03-27-03 | 09:11 PM
  #3  
reza's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
bad

my friend crashed his car driving in mountain on it.
i was in front of him, with old yoko a520 and dunlop sp8000 are gripping very well.

too many accident with kumho. don'y buy them, unless you want to total your car.

Reza
Old 03-27-03 | 09:32 PM
  #4  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Former Rx7 *****
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
i would try sp8000 or yoko AVS ES100
Old 03-27-03 | 09:48 PM
  #5  
overkill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: S.F. Bay Area, CA
wow so far, not very good reviews. Anyone else care to share their comments?
Old 03-28-03 | 10:01 AM
  #6  
overkill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Ok, I'm starting to lean torwards either the Kumho exsta mx's or the Yokohamas es100's. The only problem I see is that the Kumho's offer a 235/45 for the fronts, as opposed to the 235/40's that I want. I wonder if the 235/45's would be too tall ? My other choice would be the Yokohama es100's. The only conflicting point about those tires are that I wanted 265/40's but they only offer 255/40's or 275/40's. Would the 275/40's on a 40 + offset rub on a stock suspension???
Old 03-28-03 | 10:21 AM
  #7  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Bad. Suck. Poor. Crap.

Those are all first hand accounts
Old 03-28-03 | 10:39 AM
  #8  
redrotorR1's Avatar
LS6 Convert
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Great tire for 4-wheel slides and vicious oversteer ...

Probably the most frustrating experiences I've had auto-xing has been on Ecsta Supra 712's. For the price range, better choices ---> ES100, Sumitomo HTRZII.
Old 03-28-03 | 12:34 PM
  #9  
jpandes's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
Yup, they suck ***. You get whay you pay for. I wish I had "asked" about them before I bought them. I acan't wait for them wear out!
Old 03-28-03 | 12:34 PM
  #10  
jpandes's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
Yup, they suck ***. You get whay you pay for. I wish I had "asked" about them before I bought them. I can't wait for them wear out!
Old 03-28-03 | 01:22 PM
  #11  
Cossie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Norcal
Originally posted by reza
bad

my friend crashed his car driving in mountain on it.
i was in front of him, with old yoko a520 and dunlop sp8000 are gripping very well.

too many accident with kumho. don'y buy them, unless you want to total your car.

Reza
I dont think that accident was a tire factor....
Old 03-28-03 | 02:16 PM
  #12  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Yeah, tires don't cause accidents unless they deflate or the tread seperates.
Old 03-28-03 | 03:44 PM
  #13  
reza's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
how about not as grip.

reza
Old 03-28-03 | 04:00 PM
  #14  
sunshine's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 0
From: MN
I have them...they are ok. Havent given me any problems yet. But do consider the fact that this is my daily driver...and I usually dont push her too too hard.
Not bad for a cheap set of tires. So, thats what they are - cheap. Dont expect S-03 performance from them.
Old 03-28-03 | 07:15 PM
  #15  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Kumho Supra 712s...only good for tire barrier duty LOL
Old 03-28-03 | 08:49 PM
  #16  
overkill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Well that pretty well sums it up I guess. I'm thinking of going with the yokahama es 100's now. thanks guys
Old 03-28-03 | 09:49 PM
  #17  
rx7tt95's Avatar
Photo Diety
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Florida
I have to disagree...I've had two sets of 712's, one when I still had the twin setup and now with the big single turbo. For the money, in their price class, they cannot be beat. I've autocrossed and road raced with these particular tires. If you set up your alignment correctly and everything else is good, you'll be happy with the tires. They're quiet, wear well and are really good in the wet (I live in a sub tropical region, ie. lots of rain). No, they're not So3's, but the MX are quite close for $50/less expensive per tire.

As far as handling the power, they seem to do just fine. ANY 265/18 will bow under pressure with 435rwhp :-) They're predictable and communicate fairly well too. I can go around a corner, feed in a good dose of throttle, get the rear end sliding and control it. I've hit a best of 1.9/ 60ft. drag racing (18" wheels!) as well. Manny and I have always disagreed on them. While I do respect his opinion on many things, I'll have to pass on the Kumho's. He's never driven on them! :-)
Old 03-28-03 | 11:13 PM
  #18  
AMRAAM4's Avatar
twinturboteddy ws my idol
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
From: Elkton, MD
Jesus you guys are harsh. Anyone who expects an $80 tire to perform wonders needs a bitch slap to begin with. I, as well as many others have these on my other car in a 225/40/18 and they work great. Of course there is always something better, but then again you need to evaluate your driving and purchase accordingly then. These tires blow away the stock Goodyear Eagle RSAs that came on my other car.

Anyway, my FD had bald tires after just purchasing it, so I bought four of these to fill the void while spending the money on other reliability mods currently being done. When I get new rims I will definitely upgrade tires for those. I think whether these tires are acceptable must depend on how they are used specifically, and how much. If you are into autoX and are a hardcore handling guy like many I have seen on here, it's a no brainer you are going to think these tires are ****.
Old 03-28-03 | 11:23 PM
  #19  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
What was Pirelli's slogan? "Power is NOTHING WITHOUT CONTROL"? That sums it all up for me.

Actually I have driven on the previous generation Ecsta 711s. JUNK tires. Great for drift techniques, but no grip whatsoever. The only thing I did with those tires was take the car up to 170 mph. I can say their Z-rating was good LOL.

The Ecsta 712 treads did separate with one of my track day participants tires. He has a 2003 SVT Cobra making 450 hp (more than Michel's) with about 450 lb.ft torque. The 265/35-18s just weren't doing the job for the big 3500 lb super pony car...
Old 03-28-03 | 11:54 PM
  #20  
overkill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Yes I have to admit, tire opinions can be subjective. I personally do not autocross or race, but I would like to one day, but the fact is that I do not. I'm sure that the kumho 712 are just fine for my driving conditions. But for less money, I can get the Yokohama es 100's and they seemd to score higher than the 712's and mx's in the survey at tirerack.

The only bummer thing is that the es 100's do not come in 265/40's rather 255/40's. The funny thing is that when I bought my fd it had on the factory Bridgestone expedia's on it. I thought they were pieces of ****, till a changed them out to Firestone firehawk sz50's. Now those my friends, are pieces of ****. Too much side wall flex. I didn't realize just how good the expedia's were and that they were a bit pricey.( about $220 each). I looked from them at tirerack but didnt see them. So for now it seems like Yokohama's to me.
Old 03-29-03 | 12:01 AM
  #21  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 8
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by AMRAAM4
Jesus you guys are harsh. Anyone who expects an $80 tire to perform wonders needs a bitch slap to begin with....

If you are into autoX and are a hardcore handling guy like many I have seen on here, it's a no brainer you are going to think these tires are ****.
Many of us wouldn't dream of putting bargain tires on our FDs. So, as you even admit, on an absolute scale, they suck. Also, as far as budget tires go, I would put my current Dunlop SP8000s up against the 712s any day of the week. (They were brand new on the car when I bought it, I will be trying some S03s or Toyo T1-S next time.)

That said, I have heard really good things about the MX tires. Perhaps I'll give those a try instead of the Bridgestone's or Toyos.
Old 03-29-03 | 12:13 AM
  #22  
reza's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
under $100.
You should get Yoko ES100

reza
Old 03-29-03 | 12:34 AM
  #23  
AMRAAM4's Avatar
twinturboteddy ws my idol
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
From: Elkton, MD
Originally posted by rynberg
Many of us wouldn't dream of putting bargain tires on our FDs. So, as you even admit, on an absolute scale, they suck.
I apologize for not running my purchases by the community before buying. I guess I am a lowly, uneducated, 26 year old who just got his license and works at McD's (not that there is anything wrong with that for the young bucks out there).
Old 03-29-03 | 09:06 AM
  #24  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
To each his/her own. People posted the question. Those with experience chimed in. Sorry if the responses don't jibe with your own purchase decision. The consensus around here has been that Kumho Ecsta Supra 712s are bargain tires meant for the tuner market. Our FD Rx7s are not tuner cars. The FD Rx7 is a TRUE sports car, and thus deserves true sports car tires. Nuff said.
Old 03-30-03 | 01:48 AM
  #25  
Street King's Avatar
*** Bless Texas!
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: TX
They aren't the best but they aren't the greatest. I have had mine for awhile and they are better than my POS Potenzas RE730's. I will not get these tires again not because I disliked them, I just want really good grippy tires. One thing they they excel in wet traction.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.