Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

Ackerman adjustment???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-03 | 01:09 AM
  #1  
deggial's Avatar
Thread Starter
Interceptor
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon,Canada
Ackerman adjustment???

can ackerman be adjusted on Fc's ?
Old 12-30-03 | 07:42 AM
  #2  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 19
From: n
No, unless you're going to totall redesign the steering geometry - read:  expensive and/or labor intensive.

Why would you bother?  What small advantage you get with messing with Ackerman is all destroyed by the compliance of your chassis and suspension.


-Ted
Old 12-30-03 | 10:26 AM
  #3  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by RETed
What small advantage you get with messing with Ackerman is all destroyed by the compliance of your chassis and suspension.
Care to explain that? There are some very hot debates in the racing world right now about Ackerman...
Old 12-30-03 | 12:32 PM
  #4  
deggial's Avatar
Thread Starter
Interceptor
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon,Canada
I was just wondering.

I have a set wheels with 0 offset and wanted to know if there were ways to compensate for it.

thanks for replying.
Old 12-30-03 | 01:18 PM
  #5  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by deggial


I have a set wheels with 0 offset and wanted to know if there were ways to compensate for it.

Ackerman and wheel offset have nothing to do with eachother. Ackerman is the idea that the steered wheels on the inside of a curve must be turned a greater amount since they travel along a smaller radius than those at the outside of a curve.
Old 12-30-03 | 02:46 PM
  #6  
deggial's Avatar
Thread Starter
Interceptor
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon,Canada
With the 0 offset, won`t there be more understeer??

See this link:
http://pub25.ezboard.com/fdorikazefr...cID=4473.topic

Last edited by deggial; 12-30-03 at 02:48 PM.
Old 12-30-03 | 08:37 PM
  #7  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 19
From: n
Originally posted by DamonB
Care to explain that? There are some very hot debates in the racing world right now about Ackerman...
I'd like to see thoe debates - got a link?
RCE had a very nice V Angles article on Ackerman and F1 racing.
Basically, teams were going with negative (or was it positive?) Ackerman on the steering to get the inside wheel to turn quicker than the outside (or did I get that backward?).

This allows a split second faster response of the chassis going into a turn, but the steering responsibilities shift eventually to the outside front wheel.  The advantage was for the initial turn-in - this works very well on very stiffly sprung suspensions and stiff chassis.  If there are compliance, this short transient on turn-in gets absorbed.  On street cars, this point is basically moot.

Also, changing the Ackerman steering is a royal pain in the ***.



-Ted
Old 12-31-03 | 09:05 AM
  #8  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by RETed
I'd like to see thoe debates - got a link?
Off the top of my head I recall the Van Valkenburgh aticles you mention but I know I found some online too. I will see if I can find them again...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sukimoto
Rotary Car Performance
3
10-26-15 03:37 PM
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
10-07-15 09:12 PM
Sh00bs
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
10-02-15 12:57 AM
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
09-30-15 06:58 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
09-28-15 10:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.