Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

17x9 front 17x10 rear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-07 | 11:43 PM
  #1  
onefast3gen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: staten island ny
17x9 front 17x10 rear

Can i fit these on a fd without rolling the fenders and with what offset. Thanks
Old 10-12-07 | 11:54 PM
  #2  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
+47 to +50
Old 10-13-07 | 05:36 AM
  #3  
Oun's Avatar
Oun
I can confirm.
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
+35 on both will work. 235/45/17 front 255/40/17 rear. it'll be pretty close to stock diameters and will look good.
Old 10-13-07 | 10:18 AM
  #4  
onefast3gen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: staten island ny
Will +35 fit without rubbing the fenders. +35 and +47 and +50 are a big difference. Thanks for the quick replies.
Old 10-13-07 | 10:23 AM
  #5  
onefast3gen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: staten island ny
P.S. I want to be able to drop the car a inch and a half
Old 10-13-07 | 10:39 AM
  #6  
onefast3gen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: staten island ny
The place I'm buying them from says +38 front +42 rear does this sound about right. Will they still have a lip?
Old 10-13-07 | 03:34 PM
  #7  
onefast3gen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: staten island ny
I went with +41 front +44 rear
Old 10-19-07 | 02:45 AM
  #8  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 10
From: Davie, Florida
humm i still dont get the offset thing to much, im just an idiot, i dont understand the diff or anything.. i guess its going to suck when i have to buy rims
Old 10-19-07 | 03:36 AM
  #9  
SpeedKing's Avatar
Power Trippin'
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,129
Likes: 1
From: Land of The Quick
Originally Posted by onefast3gen

I went with +41 front...
Shoulda followed "Mahjik's" advice. That front is gonna be real tight...
Old 10-19-07 | 09:07 AM
  #10  
aznpoopy's Avatar
strike up the paean
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 2
From: fort lee, nj
Originally Posted by FD3S2005
humm i still dont get the offset thing to much, im just an idiot, i dont understand the diff or anything.. i guess its going to suck when i have to buy rims
offset = distance from the middle of the wheel to the mounting surface where it bolts to the hub

if its right in the middle, its 0mm
if its closer to the outside face, its positive
if its closer to the inside face, its negative
amount is distance from middle to actual mounting surface
Old 10-19-07 | 09:39 AM
  #11  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,138
Likes: 573
From: Arlington, VA
+35 will NOT work, particularly on a lowered FD, without rolled fenders.

I had 8.5's on the front, +37, w/ 235/45/17, and it would've jacked up the fender lips if I hadn't rolled them. Also rubbed the liners at full lock, but that's normal on FD's. I also had 8" +38's, and THEY jacked up the fenders with both 235/45 and 245/40.

The rear might work with a small tire like 255/40, but then what's the point of 10's? You need more like +42 at least to run real tires.
Old 10-19-07 | 09:40 AM
  #12  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,138
Likes: 573
From: Arlington, VA
oops... didn't read ahead. These should be better, but I'd still roll the front for safety.

You can run 255/40/17 front, and 275/40/17 rear optimally with those widths...


Originally Posted by onefast3gen
I went with +41 front +44 rear
Old 10-19-07 | 10:40 AM
  #13  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by onefast3gen
I went with +41 front +44 rear
I think you may have them mixed up, the higher number should probably be in the front and lower in the rear, that's how mine are. To piggyback on what aznpoopy said, but to explain in terms that people like myself would understand, haha, the higher the number, less lip, unless it's a face like on my Enkei RPF1 and if it's concave the lip is the same size regardless and the difference in offset is seen BEHIND the face of the wheel. I'm running 18X9.5+45 with 235/40 in the front and 18x10+38 with 265/35 in the rear (I'm pretty sure those are the tire sizes, can't quite remember and I'm not in a place to look at the car). I rolled my fenders with a bat just a little bit just to get them out of the way and I've never had an issue. I know you said WITHOUT ROLLING but I figured it might give you an idea.
Old 10-19-07 | 11:50 AM
  #14  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,386
Likes: 609
From: Bay Area CA
I agree. I have 17x9 +45 with 255/40/17s. They have been great fitment overall but I somehow caught my lip for the first time ever last week. I was turning and going up a steepish driveway.
Old 10-19-07 | 01:29 PM
  #15  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,138
Likes: 573
From: Arlington, VA
^^^^

Ideally the higher offset would go up front, but if you're culling from what's available in a given wheel, those will work. Fikse's standard fitment, FWIW, is lower on front than rear, and besides, the width differences throw it all off anyway.
Old 10-19-07 | 02:19 PM
  #16  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
^^^^

Ideally the higher offset would go up front, but if you're culling from what's available in a given wheel, those will work. Fikse's standard fitment, FWIW, is lower on front than rear, and besides, the width differences throw it all off anyway.
Yeah I guess so, haha. I only know my own wheel and assumed it was the same for all. I didn't know Fiske was set up that way, weird. I'd love to get a set of those wheels though, mmm mmm.
Old 10-20-07 | 03:24 AM
  #17  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 10
From: Davie, Florida
Originally Posted by aznpoopy
offset = distance from the middle of the wheel to the mounting surface where it bolts to the hub

if its right in the middle, its 0mm
if its closer to the outside face, its positive
if its closer to the inside face, its negative
amount is distance from middle to actual mounting surface
i kinda of get it but i kinda of done... im just stupid i guess.. unless id see examples and such thats the only way i learn... so thanks but its ok you dont have to bother with it,
Old 10-20-07 | 04:30 AM
  #18  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...&ct=image&cd=3
Old 10-20-07 | 09:43 AM
  #19  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by FD3S2005
humm i still dont get the offset thing to much, im just an idiot, i dont understand the diff or anything.. i guess its going to suck when i have to buy rims
Basically here what you need to know. The lower the offset number, the more it pushes the out away from the car. The higher (positive) the offset number is, the more tucked in the wheel will be.

So, the FD uses 16x8 with a +50 offset. If you want the wheel to be more flush with the fenders, you use a lower offset of something like +40. If you have a widebody kit which extends out, you need to use an even lower offset like a +15.

Now, if you think about spacers, they actually work the opposite. Say you want to use a 10mm spacer on the stock rims. That doesn't make the new offset 50 + 10 = 60, as that would be pushing the wheel more into the center of the car and not what a spacer does. So it's the other way 50 - 10 = 40 since its pushing the wheel out towards the fender. So adding a 10mm spacer to the stock offset would make the wheel look like a +40 offset instead of the +50 without the 10mm spacer.
Old 10-21-07 | 12:05 AM
  #20  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 10
From: Davie, Florida
Thanks mahjik ..lets see if i get this now.. the + offset brings the wheel/rim closer to the inside of the car... and - makes it more like more away from the car... i hope thats kinda right, i dont want to be wrong... if i am eh. im trying to learn..
Old 10-21-07 | 01:13 AM
  #21  
PlatinumPresto.info's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 224
Likes: 2
From: Pon De Beach
y dont you ask people to post picts of
Old 10-21-07 | 03:54 AM
  #22  
PlatinumPresto.info's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 224
Likes: 2
From: Pon De Beach
...examples
Old 10-21-07 | 05:38 AM
  #23  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 10
From: Davie, Florida
ok platinumpresto post pics!!!!... jk
Old 10-21-07 | 12:58 PM
  #24  
PlatinumPresto.info's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 224
Likes: 2
From: Pon De Beach
Originally Posted by FD3S2005
ok platinumpresto post pics!!!!... jk
lol... you know i would, but i dont know which picts have which setup!
Old 10-21-07 | 11:29 PM
  #25  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Negative (-) offset=more lip, positive (+) offset=less lip. The lower the number, the more lip.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.