T04Z Anyone have it on an FC
#2
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,093
Likes: 121
From: Twin Cities, MN
No real difference than running it on an FD. Might be a tad bit " laggier" if you are running a 87-88 Turbo2 with S4 rotors in the motor.
What is peculiar to me is the guys in Japan, and AUS have a To4Z with a GT turbine wheel( like the HKS TO4Z), while the guys in the US are just running BB To4R(P trim turbine wheel) labeled To4Z...
What is peculiar to me is the guys in Japan, and AUS have a To4Z with a GT turbine wheel( like the HKS TO4Z), while the guys in the US are just running BB To4R(P trim turbine wheel) labeled To4Z...
#5
Good info here
http://www.ausrotary.com/viewtopic.p...461&hilit=t04z
also our fuel is crappier then yours so you should get some better boost and hp
http://www.ausrotary.com/viewtopic.p...461&hilit=t04z
also our fuel is crappier then yours so you should get some better boost and hp
Trending Topics
#9
Im glad someone knows there *** from a hole in the wall with turbo nomenclature around here.
Great post!
#10
1.32 TO4R with a 1/2 bridge spools well. 20 psi at around 4500. Add the BB option on a full bridge and you're even better off. Anything smaller on the turbine housing isn't going to make it spool much quicker but will add top end restriction.
#12
Good info here
http://www.ausrotary.com/viewtopic.p...461&hilit=t04z
also our fuel is crappier then yours so you should get some better boost and hp
http://www.ausrotary.com/viewtopic.p...461&hilit=t04z
also our fuel is crappier then yours so you should get some better boost and hp
#13
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,093
Likes: 121
From: Twin Cities, MN
LoL, its kinda funny seeing peter say 1.0 all the way in that thread when we've seen him say stuff like this on here: https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...29&postcount=4
I wouldn't use a 1.32 on streetport( I've done it before), but a full bridge definitely.