Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

T04s vs T-78

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-01 | 10:42 PM
  #1  
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
Thread Starter
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
T04s vs T-78

Which makes more power and has the better power curve....... all other things being equal...??? Thanks, Chris
Old 09-16-01 | 11:58 PM
  #2  
Mach2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Inwood, Long Island
https://www.rx7club.com/vforums/show...&highlight=to4
Old 09-17-01 | 01:17 AM
  #3  
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
Thread Starter
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
looking for power curves this time...
Old 09-17-01 | 02:07 AM
  #4  
HWO's Avatar
HWO
inteligent extratarestril
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
From: The Sunny B.O.P, New Zealand
unless you are after more than 600HP, and therefore require more than 20psi worth of air flow a T04 will out perform a T78 or similar spec turbo.
Old 09-18-01 | 06:48 PM
  #5  
Mid_KnightFD's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: mobile,alabama
t04s vs t-78

ari yallon uses t-78 and look how his car performs i think results speak for them selfs.
Old 09-18-01 | 07:39 PM
  #6  
RICE RACING's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1
From: lebanon
Look at ADAM, ABLE both use to4 based turbo's .... I think their results are better.

In Australia, ALL the 8 and 9 second cars use TO4's, it is down to personal preferance I suppose.
Old 09-18-01 | 07:42 PM
  #7  
spyfish007's Avatar
Yellow Dragon is no more
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 1
From: Knoxville, TN
Ari uses the T88 . . .
Old 09-19-01 | 02:04 AM
  #8  
HWO's Avatar
HWO
inteligent extratarestril
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
From: The Sunny B.O.P, New Zealand
Re: t04s vs t-78

Originally posted by Mid_KnightFD
ari yallon uses t-78 and look how his car performs i think results speak for them selfs.
And most of you US guys have the worst case of 'off the self' and 'name brand' syndrome i have ever come across

Unless you are wanting over 600hp at the flywheel and therefore require psi to be in the mid to high 20's then a T04 based turbo will give you better results.
Old 09-19-01 | 01:08 PM
  #10  
enzo250's Avatar
IRS Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 1
From: NY
I Agree... US has the worst case of name brand syndrome... The key for Rotary's is in the Exhaust housing... This is where the power is made!!! So a t04 with a nice big exhaust housing will be plently of power...More then enough for a street car... A Turbonetics T66 would be an excellent race car setup but i wouldn't go any bigger on the comp... All that's going do is make more lag. As for the greddy t78 & t88 there just a big waste of money... Hey if you want to throw your money away let me know and i will be more then glad to take it..
Old 12-08-01 | 04:25 PM
  #11  
JoeD's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
given the fact that both cars are running similar tuning, porting, etc...wich turbo will make power at 15 PSI, T04S or T-78?? what about 17 PSI??

TIA.
Old 12-08-01 | 04:55 PM
  #12  
RotaryKnight's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: The Land Of No Pistons
I agree, unless you are building a track car who cares what Ari, Adam, Able or Ray are using. Their cars are built for track straight line performance. Also they don't worry about lag since they have otherways to compensate for it.

I daily drive my T04S and i have no problems with it...power is good and responce is good enough. At one time i was debating getting the T51R but like the T88 I don't think that it is as practical for street use as a simple T04 set up. At the most i might switch to HKS' new T04R kit.
Old 12-09-01 | 04:31 AM
  #13  
AJC13B's Avatar
10.32 @ 133
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally posted by JoeD
given the fact that both cars are running similar tuning, porting, etc...wich turbo will make power at 15 PSI, T04S or T-78?? what about 17 PSI??

TIA.
TO4S
Old 12-11-01 | 04:41 PM
  #14  
JoeD's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by AJC13B


TO4S
ya...thats what i thought.

thanks man.
Old 12-11-01 | 10:51 PM
  #15  
AREITU's Avatar
cool story bro
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley
I am VERY confused.

Is the Turbonetics 60-1 the same as the T66?

And could somebody maybe direct me to a webpage that explains compressor blade angles, trim angles, etc. and if it's not a ball-bearing turbo, what else could it be?
Old 12-12-01 | 12:00 AM
  #16  
HWO's Avatar
HWO
inteligent extratarestril
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
From: The Sunny B.O.P, New Zealand
the 60-1 is a smaller compressor than the T66, it flows less air.

for the optimum set up you want the smallest compressor that will flow the air for the HP you require, that way the sheer size of the compressor isn't hindering spool up anymore than it needs to
Old 05-17-05 | 11:32 PM
  #17  
mazda/feed's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Maryland, GERMANTOWN
ok i just bought a t78 and i hear mixed things about it, so are you saying that i wasted my money on this, what im looking for is to be in the 400hp area and what i dont want is high death sydrom that i got with the stockers, should i sell the t78
Old 05-17-05 | 11:48 PM
  #18  
artowar's Avatar
FD3SW211E55
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 6
From: NoVA
Whatever they were saying, it was in late 2001.
Old 05-22-05 | 07:25 PM
  #19  
ghostrx7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: west palm beach, FL
T78 are proven, many of the new "kits" out arent doing anything spectacular.
Old 05-22-05 | 08:22 PM
  #20  
rizzxx7's Avatar
DIGG7ER
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
From: virginia beach, va.
it doesn't matter what people think, if your comfortable with it why care what people think about your set-up? all set-ups have their upside and downside it all depends on you on what you want to do as far as everyday driving or different types of track uses such as autocrossing or drag racing. You can do what I'm about to do and build 2 different set-ups one for autocrossing and drag racing.
Old 05-23-05 | 12:06 AM
  #21  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,936
Likes: 327
From: FL
Originally Posted by rizzxx7
it doesn't matter what people think, if your comfortable with it why care what people think about your set-up? all set-ups have their upside and downside it all depends on you on what you want to do as far as everyday driving or different types of track uses such as autocrossing or drag racing.
this is the best response i've seen all night, tonight. i can't understand why so many people need validation from others, especially when they actually satisfied with what they have.
Old 05-23-05 | 05:59 PM
  #22  
Jimmynguyen's Avatar
Full Member

 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
i use t78 got no problem with it. i m at 18psi no lag
Old 05-23-05 | 06:00 PM
  #23  
Jimmynguyen's Avatar
Full Member

 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
plus u dont want 600hp, asking to throw ur engine away
Old 05-23-05 | 08:36 PM
  #24  
mazda/feed's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Maryland, GERMANTOWN
i guess people ask because they dont know, and if one has gone threw the pit falls, thats why one ask. all i can say is if you dont have anything positve to say about the subject then why say anything, i dont get this about the fourm, i guess there just trying to make there post go up in numbers
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ghooble
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
12-03-15 01:12 AM
MattZeeTerror
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
1
12-10-01 05:02 PM
1FAST7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
09-03-01 05:43 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.