MY GOAL WAS MET 769rwhp !!!!!!!!
#101
thanks for the props from everyone !!!!!! yes my next goal is to run quicker than 9.27 w/ a factory 5 speed untubbed no bottle, it takes alot more than power to run a # i'm learning that the hard way.
and yes this turbo is lazy, 5750rpm full boost (30psi) lol...... low boost .........
and yes this turbo is lazy, 5750rpm full boost (30psi) lol...... low boost .........
#104
actually i'm using the new vp Q-16 I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS FUEL !!!!!!!!
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/index2.html
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/index2.html
I had one setup go from 810 to 848hp with just a change from 'C' to 'Q' and the power difference was seen over most of the powerband.
#105
actually i'm using the new vp Q-16 I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS FUEL !!!!!!!!
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/index2.html
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/index2.html
Thanks,
Anthony
#107
You feeling like tuning a rotary? Just kidding, thanks for the offer, I will call you and let you know, I'm going to try New Jersey and see if they have any. Everything I've been reading says a 600HP car can jump to like 650 with this stuff.
Anthony
Anthony
#108
this setup has never seen c-16, and I don't think it ever will lol.........
#109
I hope you find it in your area, I had to add about 6% more fuel and trim the rear rotor to have the same egt's (add fuel) I think it has to do w/ the factory intake , but i feel that if i couldn't trim. then the rear rotor will be runnin leaner than the front. cuz the egt's were not the same . jus a lil fyi if some didn't know already .
good luck w/ your high boost tune get that q-16 !!!!!!!!!
#112
Did you choose the e11 for the 4 ignition outputs?
I am going to be running an E8 and I'm looking to make some power like that... curious if I should go the E11 route for resolution purposes.....
I am going to be running an E8 and I'm looking to make some power like that... curious if I should go the E11 route for resolution purposes.....
#113
yes, this would be a great choice. you might want to think about going w/ the fly/lead harness and have a solid setup, due to the harness that you have more than likely is 15 yrs old jus something to think about
#115
the e8 has 4 ch as well the main reason I went w/ e11 is cuz I might try the 3 rotor later ...............
#116
#117
#118
Living life 9 seconds at a time
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
No, I've always used C16 till now. Gonna dyno with my two additional fuel injectors, 5bar map sensor and around 36ish on the boost. Hopefully she stays in one piece for this weekends race. lol..
#119
good luck, you lookin to break ari's record as well ? you still got the factory tranny? mybad 4 all the Q's jus wonderin
#121
Keep the air temps under control and you should be in the 800hp club!
#122
Living life 9 seconds at a time
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Yes Im still on the factory tranny. I have a small collection Im starting, lol. No Im not worried about records as right now I just want to get a clean pass without breaking anything. BTW, Enzo Racing in NY has a Turbo II tranny from Liberty with upgraded input and output shafts and faceplated gears. Not sure if he's selling it, but its worth a call. Im sending him a tranny to have the same thing done.
#125
not bad, it sells for $ 14-15 gal depends on where you get it . I look at it only 1 way, you get what you pay for !!!!!! and w/ q16 you get the best possible protection that fuel can provide, but you must have a good tune as well. as for how much do I get it for? there is some info that I can't disclose. and i'm sorry thats one of them.
semi/sponsor w/ vp
semi/sponsor w/ vp