Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

mustang dyno VS. Dynojet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-02 | 12:26 AM
  #1  
racedriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Nanaimo, BC , Canada
mustang dyno VS. Dynojet

I just had my car dynoed wit a Mustang Dyno. How do the results compare to a Dynojet.
I heard they read lower but by how much?
Old 12-04-02 | 04:13 PM
  #2  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos, Ca
about 10 to 15% lower on the mustang dyno.
Old 12-04-02 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
Bridgeported's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 1
From: -
I heard 11%
Old 12-04-02 | 04:51 PM
  #4  
streetraceseven's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: tampa
the best way to find out is how each of them calculate the numbers they get. in that lies your answer.
Old 12-04-02 | 07:08 PM
  #5  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally posted by got banned
about 10 to 15% lower on the mustang dyno.
Not correct, its the opposite...

Actually, the Mustang dyno is very accurate, but only till around 400rwhp. It has a twin roller design as opposed to a single roller setup on a dynojet dyno, but if its a new mustang dyno they are designed for higher horsepower applications so they can be just as accurate. Demetrios K. (Reactive Racing) dynoed his car about 3 years ago on a dynojet dyno and made 500rwhp, then with the same exact setup, made no changes what so ever, dynoed the next week on a mustang dyno (same temps & humidity) and dynoed at 585rwhp.....
So it really depends on how new the dyno is and how much power your making. If your tuning on stock twins, any dyno will suffice.
Old 12-04-02 | 11:30 PM
  #6  
rx7_turbo2's Avatar
Professor D.P
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 1
From: Earth
We have an interesting thread in the Candaian forum regarding this. Out of the three rotory motors the Mustang has seen in our town two have blown up on it. Some were suggesting the additional load the mustang puts on the car might be one of the causes, anybody have any thoughts?

I know ErnieT suggests differently but from what I've seen and heard the Mustang reads lower.
Old 12-05-02 | 01:28 PM
  #7  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: NJ
If I recall correctly the mustangs read higher.
Old 12-05-02 | 06:41 PM
  #8  
FarNorthMotoring's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 347
Likes: 5
From: Alaska
The local Mustang Dyno here reads lower than a DynoJet.

A friends BPU FD dynoed 285 on the Mustang dyno and 325 on a DynoJet.

Really is how the dyno is setup. Every dyno is different you make them read higher if you like.
Old 12-05-02 | 06:56 PM
  #9  
pp13bnos's Avatar
Pineapple Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 4
From: Oregon
Dyno's are very sensitive to everything. When I did my n/a FC last time, we picked up 10 rear wheel lbs of torque, just by backing off the straps that hold the car in place! 10lbs of torque, may not seem like alot, but when you have a n/a car it is! CJ
Old 12-06-02 | 05:31 AM
  #10  
bklues's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Sundsvall, Sweden
Higher, lower....

This whole discussion only underlines that chassi dynos are totally useless to determine exact power output. If you want to measure that exactly, put your engine in a proper test cell.

Bernd Kluesener
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
05-18-18 03:44 PM
alfred1976
1st Gen General Discussion
6
10-01-17 10:51 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 08:06 PM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
09-28-15 05:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 PM.