Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Just got my car back; Gt3574 + New engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-10 | 12:43 PM
  #1  
tech b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
AZ Just got my car back; Gt3574 + New engine

Hello,

I have finally registered after lurking for years. My previous car was a C5 z06, and I've owned this Rx-7 for a little over 4 years now. When I purchased the car it had the basic bolt on mods and a street-ported engine. The mods were apexi pfc, downpipe, RB single tip catback, and an intake. I brought it by a local dealership and they told me the car was mechanically sound. I found a local shop on here, Turblown, and they showed me otherwise. They installed a water/alcohol injection kit, an ambient air intake( where the R2 oil cooler would be), and did some toe end links, fuel filter, and a full fuel system(1680cc secondaries/FJO injection driver/FPR etc). Last year the the twins went out, and I opted for them to build a new engine and go the single turbo route. The old rebuild was a turd as I was shown, and that is what we figured anyhow. Fast forward to what I had done;

- ALS seals, small street-port, studs, coated bearings/oil pump, loop lines
-Xcessive Oil Pan
Gt3574( P trim T4 1.15 Garret GT35R) @ 16psi
.120" wall 304L manifold, 3.5" downpipe, hardlined coolant and oil lines, Tial 44mm waste-gate to atmosphere
3.5" Muffled Midpipe
Switch from 600cc of methanol to 50/50
Custom Greddy Intercooler installation with Ron Davis Radiator
Knightsports Style Vented Hood
Tial Q 50mm bov
Remote Oil filter
Premix
Tweakit Idler
Relocated Battery to passenger side bin



This car is a hell of a lot faster than my old z06. The tires boil on the freeway. I was told my someone following me that it lays two big patches down.
We are hitting the dyno later this week. I will post video and the sheets. Here are some photos;
Attached Thumbnails Just got my car back; Gt3574 + New engine-twinscroll-fd-003.jpg   Just got my car back; Gt3574 + New engine-1994-mazda-rx-7-2.jpg   Just got my car back; Gt3574 + New engine-twinscroll-fd-008.jpg  
Old 02-14-10 | 12:59 PM
  #2  
Indian's Avatar
It wasn't me!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Cayman Islands
Congrats! Glad you kept with the rotary. Hope to see those dyno numbers.
Old 02-14-10 | 01:33 PM
  #3  
Islander's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 814
Likes: 7
From: Charlotte NC
Nice build..
Old 02-14-10 | 06:17 PM
  #4  
turbotoaster's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: England
i may sound a bit daft here or this might be because the pics were taken when you were still working on the engine bay, put where are your radiator fans? the oil filter looks like it would get in the way when you come them in, are you going for some slimline ones?
Old 02-17-10 | 04:10 PM
  #5  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,094
Likes: 122
From: Twin Cities, MN
Come pickup your car

1.15 Bar, 13degree ignition adv, 1100 degree F post turbo EGTS

448rwhp, 388 ft lbs of torque. Not bad for a tiny streetport and 61mm of turbo..

10psi by 2800rpms

Ran into a bottle neck at 6200rpms, was on its way to more...
Attached Thumbnails Just got my car back; Gt3574 + New engine-davedyno2.jpg  
Old 02-19-10 | 08:29 AM
  #6  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
^ That's the most low rpm torque (3k and below) I've seen out of a 13b single turbo set-up. That full range power curve really makes the complicated twins seem worthless. Great job!
Old 02-19-10 | 09:11 AM
  #7  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
This is the plain-bearing 3574? I've now seen a few really nice dynos out of this turbo.
Old 02-19-10 | 10:02 AM
  #8  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,136
Likes: 564
From: Florence, Alabama
love Sean's GT3574...

i have always believed that journal bearing turbos are under-appreciated... not saying they are better than BBs, just that the diff is much less than most realise.

also, the big deal w the GT3574 is the hot side.

consider:

GT3582r

compressor average sq inch area: 6.386

turbine average area: 5.171

GT3574

compress area: 6.386

turbine average area: 5.89

cheap and deadly

are the dyno numbers SAE?

hc
Old 02-19-10 | 10:15 AM
  #9  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,094
Likes: 122
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by Howard Coleman CPR
love Sean's GT3574...

i have always believed that journal bearing turbos are under-appreciated... not saying they are better than BBs, just that the diff is much less than most realise.

also, the big deal w the GT3574 is the hot side.

consider:

GT3582r

compressor average sq inch area: 6.386

turbine average area: 5.171

GT3574

compress area: 6.386

turbine average area: 5.89

cheap and deadly

are the dyno numbers SAE?

hc

This isn't Sean's turbo. I didn't realize until recently that we've been running this exact turbo combination for at least 4/5 years. I just never threw a catchy name together, I always called it a P trim GT35R...

Dyno numbers aren't SAE. Can I have them corrected to SAE? I am not super familiar with chassis dynos. Only reason we use one really is so we don't have to get arrested tuning a car in 4th gear on the street, and its always nice to be able to look under the hood for a 4th gear pull...
Old 02-19-10 | 10:21 AM
  #10  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,094
Likes: 122
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
This is the plain-bearing 3574? I've now seen a few really nice dynos out of this turbo.

Yup, pretty good spool for a T4 1.15 huh? I did seperate the pulses on the exhaust manifold( up until the w/g opens). If you look closely there is a divider going up to the wastegate valve.
Old 02-19-10 | 10:33 AM
  #11  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,136
Likes: 564
From: Florence, Alabama
"exact turbo combination for at least 4/5 years."

congrats on that.
Old 02-19-10 | 11:11 AM
  #12  
BoostCrzy's Avatar
Doritos on a toothpick
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 5
From: west palm beach, FL
Lookin good.....but I have a couple of questions about the dyno sheet.....

1. Why was the pull aborted at 6000rpm?
2. what was the Air fuel ratio at higher RPM (looks like a leaning trend in the graph)
3. what was boost at 4000rpm vs 6000rpm
4. why was the input weight changed?..

.....in the future try using one side of the graph for your HP/Tq scales and the other for Afr's or boost....just a suggestion
Old 02-19-10 | 12:21 PM
  #13  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,094
Likes: 122
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by BoostCrzy
Lookin good.....but I have a couple of questions about the dyno sheet.....

1. Why was the pull aborted at 6000rpm?
2. what was the Air fuel ratio at higher RPM (looks like a leaning trend in the graph)
3. what was boost at 4000rpm vs 6000rpm
4. why was the input weight changed?..

.....in the future try using one side of the graph for your HP/Tq scales and the other for Afr's or boost....just a suggestion
We started experiencing a little bit of ignition breakup. Not sure what the culprit is. Car has a new set of OEM wires, and 9 plugs, MSD 6A with a T2 L coil. We have another car that is identical that we are going to run next week, only we have the greddy plugs, twin MSD 6As and MSD coils.

That is not the best representation of AFR. We did almost 20 pulls, and didn't print every one. We ended up 13.1 out of boost, 12.9 up to 5psi and 11.8 to 16psi, past that it was tapering down to 11:1. Keep in mind there is water/alcohol injection and only 13 degrees total ignition advance from 15+psi

After we did a few pulls a subie tuner showed up and I had him resync the car and make sure all the dyno input numbers were correct. I just wanted to verify that everything was correct. He pulled up the MustangDyno's database and inputted their specifications.
Old 02-19-10 | 12:33 PM
  #14  
BoostCrzy's Avatar
Doritos on a toothpick
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 5
From: west palm beach, FL
got it... looks like it will make GREAT power at redline....
Old 02-19-10 | 05:08 PM
  #15  
mannykiller's Avatar
Garage Hero
iTrader: (93)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 18
From: Quartz Hill
maybe pick up a set of Greddy 7420's? 10's leading 12's trailing... Expensive but damn good plugs.
Old 02-19-10 | 07:19 PM
  #16  
BigTurbo74's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by mannykiller
maybe pick up a set of Greddy 7420's? 10's leading 12's trailing... Expensive but damn good plugs.
That seems to be the general consensus. Do you have any experience with them? It seems everyone recommends them but can't clearly explain why.
Old 02-19-10 | 08:13 PM
  #17  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Arrow

Originally Posted by BigTurbo74
That seems to be the general consensus. Do you have any experience with them? It seems everyone recommends them but can't clearly explain why.
Greddy rebadges them as their own race plugs, and Ari over at www.RX7.com swears by them. They were used on the American Flag record-breaking drag car.

They have a resistor (R) which is a plus for rotaries running a CAS wrt EMF, they are the proper length and socket size, and (most importantly) they have the small iridium electrode with ground strap.

To quote Ari, "These things will fire even if they're immersed in a bucket of oil"
Old 02-19-10 | 08:40 PM
  #18  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 1
From: look behind you
Originally Posted by Howard Coleman CPR
"exact turbo combination for at least 4/5 years."

congrats on that.
I'm not going to **** on the OP's thread he has a nice car and elliot got good results, I'm just going to give his memory the benefit of the doubt on the time line.

~S~
Old 02-19-10 | 10:31 PM
  #19  
KKMpunkrock2011's Avatar
dorito powered

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE
wow, this thing looks and sounds like a beast.
I really need to meet Ari in person, I've spoken with him a number of times over the phone and done quite a bit of business through him and he seems like a realy character.
Old 02-20-10 | 01:39 AM
  #20  
R3AL.CH1CK3N's Avatar
Jesse
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
nice build
Old 02-22-10 | 05:52 PM
  #21  
superslows2k's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
nice setup, its about the same setup i was planning to run
Old 02-25-10 | 01:24 AM
  #22  
TimeMachine's Avatar
Bosozoomku
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
This is very impressive. However, the large turbine A/R contradicts what I've read about quickly spooling a turbo.

From the Honeywell/Garrett webpage:

Imagine two 3.5L engines both using GT30R turbochargers. The only difference between the two engines is a different turbine housing A/R; otherwise the two engines are identical:
1. Engine #1 has turbine housing with an A/R of 0.63
2. Engine #2 has a turbine housing with an A/R of 1.06.
What can we infer about the intended use and the turbocharger matching for each engine?

Engine#1: This engine is using a smaller A/R turbine housing (0.63) thus biased more towards low-end torque and optimal boost response. Many would describe this as being more "fun" to drive on the street, as normal daily driving habits tend to favor transient response. However, at higher engine speeds, this smaller A/R housing will result in high backpressure, which can result in a loss of top end power. This type of engine performance is desirable for street applications where the low speed boost response and transient conditions are more important than top end power.

Engine #2: This engine is using a larger A/R turbine housing (1.06) and is biased towards peak horsepower, while sacrificing transient response and torque at very low engine speeds. The larger A/R turbine housing will continue to minimize backpressure at high rpm, to the benefit of engine peak power. On the other hand, this will also raise the engine speed at which the turbo can provide boost, increasing time to boost. The performance of Engine #2 is more desirable for racing applications than Engine #1 since Engine #2 will be operating at high engine speeds most of the time.
So why is it then, given the above statement from Garrett, that the large A/R of this setup is spooling so quick?
Old 02-25-10 | 03:23 AM
  #23  
quattro4now's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by TimeMachine
So why is it then, given the above statement from Garrett, that the large A/R of this setup is spooling so quick?
You have to keep in mind that this is a GT3574, and it has the exhaust housing machined to take a larger turbine wheel. While you can compare the results to a GT35, you can't compare them apples to apples on their exhaust A/Rs because they aren't the same turbo (not that end anyway).
Old 02-25-10 | 11:22 AM
  #24  
Barry Bordes's Avatar
"Elusive, not deceptive!”
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 930
Likes: 13
From: Slidell, LA
I love the your idea of a divided wastegate manifold. Very simple yet very effective.
Barry

Old 02-25-10 | 11:30 AM
  #25  
R3AL.CH1CK3N's Avatar
Jesse
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
^+1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 AM.