Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Efr 7670

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-13 | 11:16 AM
  #76  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Gotcha. Thanks!

So Rick Shaw has the 8374?
Old 10-14-13 | 07:10 PM
  #77  
Enigmatic's Avatar
Braaaap Tshhhh!
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 113
Likes: 5
From: Sydney, Australia
^Yes he does.
Old 07-23-14 | 11:36 AM
  #78  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Any updates? Still enjoying the turbo setup?
Old 07-24-14 | 12:02 AM
  #79  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Yep, still enjoying the turbo, but rebuilding the engine right now lol. Thinking I might need to switch to the 8374 lol.
Old 07-24-14 | 02:59 AM
  #80  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Ha, just realized we joined this site at the same time, lol. Anyways. What let go? Just finished installing mine last week. Using ALS seals and teflon coated coolant seals so hopefully they'll be more robust. What was in yours?
Old 07-24-14 | 08:59 PM
  #81  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Oh yeah we did huh? lol

I was using ALS seals also. My exhaust ports were rectangular and the ends of the apex seals wore down as they went over the sides of the ports, while the middle did not. They wore down to the point that I lost compression enough to start the car. Oil and pull starting were the only ways to start it. I sent the seals back to Edgar and he said he was surprised it ran as long as it did considering the wear the housings put on the seals. He gave me a discount on another set of seals and I got a replacement engine so we'll see how this one does lol. This time I'm using ALS (or rather E&J) seals again, and the Pineapple HD kit and the rest is Atkins with their solid corner seals. Although I'm thinking I maybe should go with OEM corner seals this time. I had some chatter marks in my housings too. I was also thinking about using Goopy 1pc seals and using these E&J seals in another engine I'm going to build as a backup, but I'm not sure.
Old 07-24-14 | 10:51 PM
  #82  
lOOkatme's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 11
From: Colorado Springs, CO
go with the E&J since you have them. No need to build a back up engine, this is it baby!
Old 07-25-14 | 10:48 AM
  #83  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
I'm still building a backup lol. That way when this one goes, the car will be back on the road in a weekend.
Old 07-25-14 | 12:05 PM
  #84  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,322
Likes: 834
From: CA
My experience-

Too much boost on pump gas= detonation= very high EGTs= more apex seal sag/wear.

Even if its not breaking your engine detonation's higher EGTs will wear it our really fast.

Tune on 104, then pull or abuse your O2 sensor by running 5 gallons 116 with each tank of pump gas to save $$.

TEL in the leaded gas raises octane of non leaded gas far higher than the average by volume of the leaded/non-leaded mix.

On race gas even lean outs from component failure won't detonate, power just drops out.
Old 07-25-14 | 12:11 PM
  #85  
lOOkatme's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 11
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
My experience-

Too much boost on pump gas= detonation= very high EGTs= more apex seal sag/wear.

Even if its not breaking your engine detonation's higher EGTs will wear it our really fast.

Tune on 104, then pull or abuse your O2 sensor by running 5 gallons 116 with each tank of pump gas to save $$.

TEL in the leaded gas raises octane of non leaded gas far higher than the average by volume of the leaded/non-leaded mix.

On race gas even lean outs from component failure won't detonate, power just drops out.
He runs water/meth injection with his engine. The seal wear aligns perfectly with his exhaust port. looks like the seal was catching the exhaust port. He is going back to stock ports with this engine build.
Old 07-25-14 | 02:31 PM
  #86  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,322
Likes: 834
From: CA
Ah, nice. I haven't tried water/meth yet.

I pretty much use a stock closing line on the exhaust port as well.
just the top outer corners squared up more, but rebevelled/ surface height relieved like stock.

When I have run into detonation on pump gas it has worn a flat spot on the side of the apex seals where it runs over the (raised from heat) leading spark plug hole/boss.
Old 07-26-14 | 07:14 PM
  #87  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Thanks for your input! I have been told I'm boosting too high on pump gas, so even though I'll be keeping water injection, I believe I'm gonna drop the boost a bit. I don't trust my knock sensor anyway, but because I'm using delrin engine mounts, I'm not sure if it's causing my high knock readings or if it really was detonating. The readings will be fairly low until I just barely step on the gas, and from then on and higher my knock readings soar. My EGTs were fairly normal until I'd be on the highway for a while, then they'd peg as high as the gauge would read.

I see water/meth as somewhat of a double edged sword. You really need to run excess premix so it doesn't get washed off the housing walls, but for the first time that I've used water injection on the entire life of the engine, I finally didn't have scorch marks and cracks next to the spark plug holes. I still have my OMP and I put Valvoline 2 cycle through it, and I've been premixing the same stuff in the tank, about .5oz to every gallon. I'll be bumping that up to at least 1/1, maybe even a tad more than that.
Old 07-26-14 | 08:01 PM
  #88  
lOOkatme's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 11
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by speedjunkie
Thanks for your input! I have been told I'm boosting too high on pump gas, so even though I'll be keeping water injection, I believe I'm gonna drop the boost a bit. I don't trust my knock sensor anyway, but because I'm using delrin engine mounts, I'm not sure if it's causing my high knock readings or if it really was detonating. The readings will be fairly low until I just barely step on the gas, and from then on and higher my knock readings soar. My EGTs were fairly normal until I'd be on the highway for a while, then they'd peg as high as the gauge would read.

I see water/meth as somewhat of a double edged sword. You really need to run excess premix so it doesn't get washed off the housing walls, but for the first time that I've used water injection on the entire life of the engine, I finally didn't have scorch marks and cracks next to the spark plug holes. I still have my OMP and I put Valvoline 2 cycle through it, and I've been premixing the same stuff in the tank, about .5oz to every gallon. I'll be bumping that up to at least 1/1, maybe even a tad more than that.
I have a map from another board member which I think is really good for timing. perhaps we run that on your car and see what the EGT's look like. It might change your knock as well.
Old 07-26-14 | 09:19 PM
  #89  
Enigmatic's Avatar
Braaaap Tshhhh!
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 113
Likes: 5
From: Sydney, Australia
Hey man, keep up the updates! I finally got my 7670 and getting bits and pieces together to do the conversion. What boost were you running? I was looking at 15-18 on 98.
Old 07-26-14 | 09:25 PM
  #90  
lOOkatme's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 11
From: Colorado Springs, CO
I think he was running mid 20's PSI. I don't think its your PSI, because you had good intake temps and your pressure ratio (3.13) is efficient according to the compressor map. The best boost level at our altitude would probably be around a pressure ratio of 2.8 or 21 PSI for that turbo. I think your timing might be the problem. I have your map and when I compare it to the one I am running, your timing is quit a bit retarded from mine, which typically means hotter exhaust temps, and I think mine is conservative.
Old 07-26-14 | 09:34 PM
  #91  
Enigmatic's Avatar
Braaaap Tshhhh!
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 113
Likes: 5
From: Sydney, Australia
I daily drive mine so I was looking for a more conservative tune, but still want to crack 400hp (on an Australian dyno, none of this happy US stuff )
Old 07-27-14 | 07:54 PM
  #92  
genzer's Avatar
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
I'm almost absolutely positive you were over 400hp, and most likely over 400whp when running 20psi on that turbo.

We wanna see the motor apart!! Lookin' great.

Where do you get the motivation to keep going?

Are you switching turbos?
Old 07-28-14 | 12:20 AM
  #93  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by lOOkatme
I have a map from another board member which I think is really good for timing. perhaps we run that on your car and see what the EGT's look like. It might change your knock as well.
Ok sounds good.

Originally Posted by Enigmatic
Hey man, keep up the updates! I finally got my 7670 and getting bits and pieces together to do the conversion. What boost were you running? I was looking at 15-18 on 98.
Good! You're gonna love it. I was running around 24psi, but we're at 6000ft elevation, so I know it drops the hp a little but I'm not sure about psi. I'm planning on dropping it to about 18-20.

Originally Posted by lOOkatme
I think he was running mid 20's PSI. I don't think its your PSI, because you had good intake temps and your pressure ratio (3.13) is efficient according to the compressor map. The best boost level at our altitude would probably be around a pressure ratio of 2.8 or 21 PSI for that turbo. I think your timing might be the problem. I have your map and when I compare it to the one I am running, your timing is quit a bit retarded from mine, which typically means hotter exhaust temps, and I think mine is conservative.
I'm not saying my boost is what did me in, I'm just saying I don't want to take any chances blowing the engine because of too much boost. I'm fine with changing the timing, we can try that. I'll set boost to 21psi.

Originally Posted by Enigmatic
I daily drive mine so I was looking for a more conservative tune, but still want to crack 400hp (on an Australian dyno, none of this happy US stuff )
I want to daily mine but I can only do that in the summer and I need to finish reinstalling the AC. Also, I need to keep it running lol.

What is the difference between US and Australian dynos?

Originally Posted by genzer
I'm almost absolutely positive you were over 400hp, and most likely over 400whp when running 20psi on that turbo.

We wanna see the motor apart!! Lookin' great.

Where do you get the motivation to keep going?

Are you switching turbos?
I doubt I hit 400, but anything is possible I guess. I'll post some pics of the internals one of these days. I haven't had much motivation actually. I've had more lately because this summer has been so nice and it seems like so many others are up and running and it drives me crazy lol. Plus I'm trying to finish it before I deploy again. I've been dating my gf for about a year and a half and spending most of my time with her. Otherwise I would've been doing all this last summer already. I'm not blaming her, I've enjoyed spending time with her. I'm just saying when I'm single about all I do is work on the car so I get a lot more done lol. I don't think I'll switch turbos until this one goes. Then I might do it.
Old 07-28-14 | 12:05 PM
  #94  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,322
Likes: 834
From: CA

What is the difference between US and Australian dynos?


I think Australians commonly use Dyno Dynamics dynos which read lower.

For instance my local dyno is Dyno Dynamics and my car makes 300rwhp @ 10psi, 325rwhp @ 16psi and 330rwhp @ 18psi.

My car has previously dynoed
340 @ 12psi on DynoJet

340 @ 12psi on DynaPack
385 @ 14psi on DynaPack

Two Stock class "505hp" C6 Z06 made 370 and 380rwhp respectively on the local Dyno Dynamics.

You can set the Dyno Dynamics on "flywheel hp" and it will spit out DynoJet and DynaPack compatible numbers.

For example my Dyno Dynamics 330rwhp became 375hp in "flywheel" mode.
Old 07-28-14 | 12:10 PM
  #95  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,322
Likes: 834
From: CA
I doubt I hit 400, but anything is possible I guess.

Could easily be over 400rwhp on DynoJet.

My car would have made over 400rwhp on a DynoJet at 16psi on my 57lbsmin peak 60-1 HiFi stock hybrid, but the runs were aborted due to BOV popping open.

The trend was 20hp over the 385rwhp runs though.

The 7670 flows 64lbsmin peak.
Old 07-31-14 | 01:32 AM
  #96  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by BLUE TII

What is the difference between US and Australian dynos?


I think Australians commonly use Dyno Dynamics dynos which read lower.

For instance my local dyno is Dyno Dynamics and my car makes 300rwhp @ 10psi, 325rwhp @ 16psi and 330rwhp @ 18psi.

My car has previously dynoed
340 @ 12psi on DynoJet

340 @ 12psi on DynaPack
385 @ 14psi on DynaPack

Two Stock class "505hp" C6 Z06 made 370 and 380rwhp respectively on the local Dyno Dynamics.

You can set the Dyno Dynamics on "flywheel hp" and it will spit out DynoJet and DynaPack compatible numbers.

For example my Dyno Dynamics 330rwhp became 375hp in "flywheel" mode.
Oh OK. I think a friend with a local shop has a Dyno Dynamics and he used to sell them, if I'm remembering the brand correctly. I went to him in 2010 to tune and we would plateau at 300hp. Turned out to be the fuel pump only getting 6v. After I did the rewire it worked like a champ.

Originally Posted by BLUE TII
I doubt I hit 400, but anything is possible I guess.

Could easily be over 400rwhp on DynoJet.

My car would have made over 400rwhp on a DynoJet at 16psi on my 57lbsmin peak 60-1 HiFi stock hybrid, but the runs were aborted due to BOV popping open.

The trend was 20hp over the 385rwhp runs though.

The 7670 flows 64lbsmin peak.
I haven't actually had it on a dyno in a long time. Something bad always happens lol.

Here are some pics as Terrence requested.
Name:  20140630_214138_zpsvmxinkql.jpg
Views: 315
Size:  63.0 KB
Name:  20140630_214445_zps7gqgeqvm.jpg
Views: 311
Size:  63.7 KB
Name:  20140630_214544_zpsntgn6s9r.jpg
Views: 301
Size:  73.2 KB
Name:  20140630_214555_zpsk9rarput.jpg
Views: 295
Size:  55.4 KB
Name:  20140630_214620_zpst0k2xawh.jpg
Views: 296
Size:  75.7 KB
Name:  20140630_214655_zpsp2h5s8ja.jpg
Views: 292
Size:  45.4 KB
Old 07-31-14 | 12:36 PM
  #97  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,322
Likes: 834
From: CA
That exhaust port is indeed horrible, but it is not what wore the apex seals.

Note that the apex seal is worn where it is in continuous contact with the rotor housing.

It appears that the chrome has flaked off the rotor housing adjacent to the exhaust port. The seal is riding on the sheet metal insert in that area of wear on the apex seal.

----------------------
Side rant-

Also, the apex seal material is not compatible with the chrome rotor housing material.

Note the chatter marks on the entire rotor housing surface. The chatter will greatly increase wear on the rotor housing, apex seal, rotor slot as well as greatly increased change of "spitback" (Mazda's term) induced preignition/misfire as the apex seal crosses the rotor housing minor axis.

I ran RA Classic seals and RA SuperSeals in 2mm and 3mm (among other aftermarket seals) with similar results.

With OEM 2mm or 3mm seals the engine runs better, lasts longer and when you take it apart it is evident why. Smooth housing surfaces with very little wear.

Note I have managed to break all types of apex seals with crap pump gas and detonation as well.

With 3mm seals (OEM or aftermarket) my experience is that its about 50/50 whether the cornerseals, apex seals or housings crack first. I don't see the benefit of a "stronger" aftermarket 3mm seal.

My experience with 2mm seals (OEM and aftermarket) is that they are indeed the weakest link with detonation. More broken apex seals from detonation, but less detonation induced engine damage overall (engine doesn't run long while detonating).
Old 07-31-14 | 01:01 PM
  #98  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
How many miles were on those housings with the ALS seals? The chatter marks make me nervous since I'm running the same seals. How much did you premix?
Old 07-31-14 | 02:06 PM
  #99  
djseven's Avatar
Eh
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,545
Likes: 334
From: Nashville, TN
When did you purchase the set of ALS seals that were in the motor?
Old 08-01-14 | 12:52 AM
  #100  
speedjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Make an assessment...
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 120
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
That exhaust port is indeed horrible, but it is not what wore the apex seals.

Note that the apex seal is worn where it is in continuous contact with the rotor housing.

It appears that the chrome has flaked off the rotor housing adjacent to the exhaust port. The seal is riding on the sheet metal insert in that area of wear on the apex seal.

----------------------
Side rant-

Also, the apex seal material is not compatible with the chrome rotor housing material.

Note the chatter marks on the entire rotor housing surface. The chatter will greatly increase wear on the rotor housing, apex seal, rotor slot as well as greatly increased change of "spitback" (Mazda's term) induced preignition/misfire as the apex seal crosses the rotor housing minor axis.

I ran RA Classic seals and RA SuperSeals in 2mm and 3mm (among other aftermarket seals) with similar results.

With OEM 2mm or 3mm seals the engine runs better, lasts longer and when you take it apart it is evident why. Smooth housing surfaces with very little wear.

Note I have managed to break all types of apex seals with crap pump gas and detonation as well.

With 3mm seals (OEM or aftermarket) my experience is that its about 50/50 whether the cornerseals, apex seals or housings crack first. I don't see the benefit of a "stronger" aftermarket 3mm seal.

My experience with 2mm seals (OEM and aftermarket) is that they are indeed the weakest link with detonation. More broken apex seals from detonation, but less detonation induced engine damage overall (engine doesn't run long while detonating).
I agree, the seal is worn along the edges where it keeps contact with the housing. And they are worn the whole width of the material beside the exhaust port, not just at the edges where the housings are flaking. The only part that doesn't seem worn is the part that moved directly over the port.

My only fear with OEM seals is the reputation of breaking and taking out housing, turbo, rotor...if not for that I'd definitely get some.

I've never even thought about going 3mm. I'm planning to always stick with 2mm.

Originally Posted by rx7 SE
How many miles were on those housings with the ALS seals? The chatter marks make me nervous since I'm running the same seals. How much did you premix?
About 15k. At first I was premixing about 1oz/gallon but I went down to .5oz/gallon since I still have OMP and I'm injecting 2-cycle through that as well. On this next engine I'm going back to 1/1 or maybe even 1.5/1.

Originally Posted by djseven
When did you purchase the set of ALS seals that were in the motor?
It was probably around May or June 2012. I put the engine together in July. I got them from you lol. I sent the seals to Edgar and he said he was surprised the engine lasted more than 1000 or 2000 miles the way the seals were worn lol. He gave me a discount on another set.


Quick Reply: Efr 7670



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.