and rolling road ,or chassis dynos have never been exactly accurate.
that said the way it should be done on an engine dyno that uses electric back feed,I cant think of name, but the guys that know will know.

maybe EDDY CURRENT?

 

Again, its NOT a big deal. Guy, understand that its NOT a big deal.
Do you understand when we say "it's not a big deal"?


Here is what I (and many others) want to know. Assuming he's telling the truth - whats the secret?
He's been very helpful in posting the specifics ('cept for the port configuration) so is the intake setup helping him? Let's learn something!


...btw, it's not a big deal.

 

lol

 

https://www.rx7club.com/classifieds-violations-265/1988-mazda-rx7-turbo-%2411-500-o-b-o-middleburg-fl-886243/

this kid thinks its a big deal.

 

Can I post in this thread? I so want to but the mods might be angry since its a for sale thread but its false advertising...

thewird

 

It's going to get taken down for a violation.

~S~

 

i mean seriously, i couldn't help it i had to.

 

Decided to just laugh at it, its gonna get taken down anyway.

thewird

 

I couln't resist, but ya, it's hilarious!

 

https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-rx-7s-23/pfs-741rwhp%4027-psi-821290/

Just found that thread. These number are kinda close, but no bs flags and name calling here.

700+@24 psi....... hmmmm.. Stock uim, lim..

 

Any word on second dyno results?

 

Last I heard from James was the 20th... he was supposed to come up this past friday.......

-Jack

 

Well...?

 

well well?

 

someone please close this thread....he isnt going to post here anymore.

 

yep, sounds like he chickened out of the dyno run when he knew it wasnt really gonna produce the numbers he claimed

 

Maybe this happened during the dyno session??

If you don't get it,don't reply.. ****..

 

lol!

thewird