Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

bw S362 FMW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-12 | 09:09 PM
  #1  
chohakai's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
bw S362 FMW

It looks like an insanely good turbo. Anyone tried it yet on a 13B or any other rotaries? Obviously it looks like a great fit for a 2 rotor with S362 size / S366 flow on the compressor side, really good ex/ind ratio on the turbine side with a new type of turbine design:

http://www.theboostlab.com/store/products/S362-FMW.html

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=2268889
Old 02-12-12 | 09:21 PM
  #2  
0110-M-P's Avatar
Too Many Projects
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
I have been looking at this turbo extensively (mostly for my NSX, but was interested for the FD as well). I need to see more people's results though before ditching my perfectly good T04Z. However, if I were building a new setup I would be inclined to give it a try.
Old 02-12-12 | 09:47 PM
  #3  
killahrx7's Avatar
dyno queen potentials
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 445
Likes: 1
From: ga
made 398 hp on customer's car at 14 psi, large street port,
Old 02-12-12 | 10:51 PM
  #4  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 1
From: Arctic Circle
I know a couple guys who run them. Great turbo that responds like the S360 but makes power closer to the S363, about 5 lb/min shy of an S366.

Originally Posted by 0110-M-P
I have been looking at this turbo extensively (mostly for my NSX, but was interested for the FD as well). I need to see more people's results though before ditching my perfectly good T04Z. However, if I were building a new setup I would be inclined to give it a try.
It will run circles around the T04Z. Not to say it will make a huge amount of power more, but it will do it more efficiently and spool better.
Old 02-13-12 | 05:12 AM
  #5  
dznutzuk's Avatar
Uncontrollable drifter
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Greece
I got it but haven't broken-in my new engine yet...
Old 02-13-12 | 09:41 AM
  #6  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,136
Likes: 564
From: Florence, Alabama
comp is 62/83 56 trim
turbine is 68/76

the BW turbo i am currently attempting to evaluate is:

63/88
68/76

average compressor area

6.53 V my turbo at 7.06

turbine

6.31 V 6.35

looks good on paper.

my BW S300/63 has a nice hot size (v comp) the turbo really likes RPM. i have no doubt it will pull happily to 9000. my low EGTs (1500 at 8500) indicate this.

i will add it into my stickied turbo comparison thread...

howard
Old 02-13-12 | 07:25 PM
  #7  
chohakai's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
That's awesome, Howard!

The dimensions aside, both the compressor and the turbine are very different in design with this FMW turbo. It'll be interesting to see!


Originally Posted by Howard Coleman CPR
comp is 62/83 56 trim
turbine is 68/76

the BW turbo i am currently attempting to evaluate is:

63/88
68/76

average compressor area

6.53 V my turbo at 7.06

turbine

6.31 V 6.35

looks good on paper.

my BW S300/63 has a nice hot size (v comp) the turbo really likes RPM. i have no doubt it will pull happily to 9000. my low EGTs (1500 at 8500) indicate this.

i will add it into my stickied turbo comparison thread...

howard
Old 02-14-12 | 09:19 AM
  #8  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,136
Likes: 564
From: Florence, Alabama
"The dimensions aside, both the compressor and the turbine are very different in design with this FMW turbo."

yes, i agree. my dimensional comparison between turbos, using average wheel areas of course only goes so far. it does, however, provide an excellent starting point for comparing turbos.

turbos are exciting ATM as there are alot of forward strides being made and airflow is everything... all you have to do is compare HP and BOOST plots of a dyno run to see this.

any upward wiggle in boost and you have a bump in HP.

of course to be technically correct, it isn't boost as in PSI that gets it done, it is flow or the amount of oxygen molecules entering the engine.

hc
Old 02-14-12 | 01:03 PM
  #9  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 1
From: Arctic Circle
Originally Posted by chohakai
That's awesome, Howard!

The dimensions aside, both the compressor and the turbine are very different in design with this FMW turbo. It'll be interesting to see!
They actually arent. The turbine wheel use in the S362 FMW is the same as in Howard's turbo, and the compressor is only slightly smaller and capable of ~3lb/min less. Overall performance will be rather similar, with the FMW version being quicker spooling.
Old 02-14-12 | 02:41 PM
  #10  
0110-M-P's Avatar
Too Many Projects
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
From what I have read, it is the same turbine wheel as used in the original S362 (S300SX 8375), with a FMW compressor wheel similar to the one out of the newer EFR 8374 with different dimensions/trim (61.4mm inducer/83.4mm exducer on the S300SX FMW vs. 62.6mm inducer/83mm exducer on the EFR).
Old 02-14-12 | 05:32 PM
  #11  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 1
From: Arctic Circle
Originally Posted by 0110-M-P
From what I have read, it is the same turbine wheel as used in the original S362 (S300SX 8375), with a FMW compressor wheel similar to the one out of the newer EFR 8374 with different dimensions/trim (61.4mm inducer/83.4mm exducer on the S300SX FMW vs. 62.6mm inducer/83mm exducer on the EFR).
Its the turbine standard in the 8875, but optionally it can be built with the turbine from the 8375. The compressor is definitely similar to that of the EFR 8374.
Old 02-14-12 | 08:50 PM
  #12  
1wide7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From: balto
I run the older version of this turbo on my fd (the original s362). Its a great street turbo I made 417 rwhp @15 psi and 480 rwhp at 18-20psi on methanol injection with a street port.
Old 02-15-12 | 02:59 PM
  #13  
0110-M-P's Avatar
Too Many Projects
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by ScorpionT
Its the turbine standard in the 8875.
Yep, I was mistaken...been doing too much research lately and everything is beginning to blend together in my mind.
Old 03-13-12 | 08:55 PM
  #14  
R_PROWESS's Avatar
burn to burn
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 16
From: Rochester, IN
looking more into this turbo.. on nasioc they mention the option of getting the turbine in either flat tip or cup tip. in the original posting the boost lab doesn't seem to give the option and I'm not sure which one they're selling. Either way, which compressor option would be more ideal on a 13b?
Old 03-13-12 | 09:07 PM
  #15  
R_PROWESS's Avatar
burn to burn
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 16
From: Rochester, IN
I think after further research the turbine shape is dependent upon the size chosen. I was under the assumption all sizes came in 2 forms.
Old 03-13-12 | 09:38 PM
  #16  
rcracer_tx's Avatar
Doing the Ricky Bobby

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally Posted by keithrulz
looking more into this turbo.. on nasioc they mention the option of getting the turbine in either flat tip or cup tip. in the original posting the boost lab doesn't seem to give the option and I'm not sure which one they're selling. Either way, which compressor option would be more ideal on a 13b?
Are they referring to a clipped turbine wheel? If so it really doesn't make sense to if you have such a variety of turbos after shying away from the stock twins... Clipped turbos really are never worth it unless trying to get max flow out of an OEM turbo (not fd specific) imho.
Old 03-13-12 | 10:02 PM
  #17  
R_PROWESS's Avatar
burn to burn
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 16
From: Rochester, IN
clipped? I'm no expert on turbos, but no i don't believe so.
Old 03-14-12 | 08:51 AM
  #18  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
Clipping is simply removing material from the wheels. You'll typically see it on turbos that have bent fins from heat or erosion from debris. FYI Kg Parts use to sell the R85 turbo kits that were using S362 turbos. Though that specific S362 is different from what's being sold today you can still use that for a basis of research.

I owned an R85 turbo kit for a period, that's what started my love affair for Borg Warner turbos. I literally BEAT THE SNOT out of the turbo and never once had a problem with it. To get the exact specs of the older S362 (R85 turbo) search the threads for the one company that would do modifications to install a 66mm compressor wheel. From memory the turbine wheel was slightly larger and the turbine housing A/R was larger than the standard size offered today.
Old 03-15-12 | 05:14 PM
  #19  
rcracer_tx's Avatar
Doing the Ricky Bobby

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally Posted by mono4lamar
Clipping is simply removing material from the wheels. You'll typically see it on turbos that have bent fins from heat or erosion from debris. FYI Kg Parts use to sell the R85 turbo kits that were using S362 turbos. Though that specific S362 is different from what's being sold today you can still use that for a basis of research.

I owned an R85 turbo kit for a period, that's what started my love affair for Borg Warner turbos. I literally BEAT THE SNOT out of the turbo and never once had a problem with it. To get the exact specs of the older S362 (R85 turbo) search the threads for the one company that would do modifications to install a 66mm compressor wheel. From memory the turbine wheel was slightly larger and the turbine housing A/R was larger than the standard size offered today.
Yeah, when I was reading from his post from earlier I was thinking that he was saying "Cut" tip not "Cup" tip. My misunderstanding on that one....

At the shop I used to work at we always recommended Borg Warner turbos over the Garret gt series as they spooled about the same time, and were cheaper and more reliable. The Borgs seemed almost indestructible as long as you didn't blow the engine and send crap through the turbine wheel.
Old 07-30-12 | 11:25 AM
  #20  
0110-M-P's Avatar
Too Many Projects
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
Has there been anyone else who has used this turbo in the past several months? I'm still looking at possibly selling my T04Z to pick one of these up in the near future.
Old 07-30-12 | 12:23 PM
  #21  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 432
Likes: 1
From: Arctic Circle
Originally Posted by 0110-M-P
Has there been anyone else who has used this turbo in the past several months? I'm still looking at possibly selling my T04Z to pick one of these up in the near future.
I believe there is one member here who uses the turbo on his car. I have used them on a few different applications and they are nice little turbos. Its a much better turbo than a T04Z because responds quicker and makes similar peak power. The more efficient compressor will help with slightly lower intake temps as well.
Old 07-31-12 | 01:49 AM
  #22  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
Built another for a customer 2 months ago. Talk about a freight train...
Old 07-31-12 | 01:53 AM
  #23  
chohakai's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by mono4lamar
Built another for a customer 2 months ago. Talk about a freight train...
More info please! especially if you have dyno chart!
Old 07-31-12 | 10:53 AM
  #24  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
I street tune the cars as I do not have a dyno, YET. I'm not sure what information you really want. We built him one of our VE turbo manifolds; he has very little mods. Just a front mount intercooler and a Power FC. Believe it or not the factory ignition is doing just fine.
Old 08-01-12 | 09:31 PM
  #25  
Molotovman's Avatar
Ban Peak
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 437
From: Northern Virginia
I have an S366 I picked up for my N/A 6pT build. The PO told me he was making close to 500 WHP at 15 psi with his large steetport S5 13BT block.

I'm shooting for 400 on my stock port block. Maybe more if I can afford AI after doing a v-mount.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.