Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

building custom manifold, where to get piping?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-04 | 01:27 PM
  #51  
Trav's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
^^^that looks pretty slick. Wondering how you would make your own custom tube tho....
Old 10-25-04 | 01:35 PM
  #52  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
Wow, that is pretty hot. I'll have to try that thanks! I wonder how well it would work for IC pipe? Surely they would be less prone to heat soak, not to mention the extra bling, bling under the hood.
Old 10-25-04 | 04:27 PM
  #53  
rotarypower101's Avatar
sdrawkcab
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 1
From: Portland Oregon
I was told by the guy that made that, that it was made with a silicone bladder, though it would be real easy to just use the carbon tube and wet it up and then use shrink wrap to hold it over a standard tube while it cures. Then cut the shrink off, sand lightly, and gelcoat or epoxy over for a nice clear smooth finish.
Old 10-26-04 | 01:19 PM
  #54  
Trav's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
What would you use for the standard (inner) tube? How would you get it out?

I was thinking more along the lines of a foam core..easy to work with, can cut/mold in pretty much any fashion you want. Then when the carbon tube is cured, pour acetone down the tube, foam is gone, and viola. (easier said that done, I know, but you get the idea).
Old 10-29-04 | 12:55 AM
  #55  
LT1-7's Avatar
John
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Originally Posted by 80-CU.IN.T
Tubo1 - ( Welding Flux? ) Who makes it? I am very interested. I have always back purged. A manufactures name would be great.
http://www.burnsstainless.com/Hardwa...vicecosts.html

back purging is always better, though using flux is simple and probably cheaper
Old 10-29-04 | 01:52 AM
  #56  
80-CU.IN.T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Kalifornia
Originally Posted by LT1-7
http://www.burnsstainless.com/Hardwa...vicecosts.html

back purging is always better, though using flux is simple and probably cheaper
LT1-7 I have been buying from Burn’s for quite a while since I live is S. Kalifornia and I have never even looked at their teck articles or hard wear. Very funny, good info. I will locate the manufacturer of solar flux and give it a try. If it works it would definitely make life easier.
Hey Turbo 1 - I guess I should check my spelling next time sorry about that. Turbo1– tubo1 Oh well it’s only a letter
Old 02-16-05 | 03:47 AM
  #57  
the7's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: australia
hey guys,

got my car dynoed this week 293kw @ wheels
The figure is actually more than i was shooting for. we had a 7psi spring in the w/gate, and were going to bleed it off to 10 -12 psi. the plumbing for my wastegate is undersized and wasnt able to flow enough gas to better control the boost pressure. AN SO THE BOOST GRADUALLY CREPT TO 16PSI (without bleeding the w/gate).backed off below 7000rpm, because the engine isnt equipt to deal with that boost or grunt. (no dowels or 3mm seals)

the wastegate plumbing on my manifold is 1"I.D.
can i please get some advice on tube size and design
Old 02-16-05 | 01:01 PM
  #58  
pistonsuk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 685
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Stainless Elbows

go to pg11 of www.mcmaster.com website

i used part#45735K216

they weld up great

justin
Old 02-17-05 | 07:18 AM
  #59  
the7's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: australia
Originally Posted by pistonsuk
go to pg11 of www.mcmaster.com website

i used part#45735K216

they weld up great

justin
thanks dude, but getting the material isnt the problem. i think ill by local i live in australia
its more constucting the wastegate plumbing to flow large volumes of gas, so i can control my boost pressure

any threads i couldnt find in the search
Old 02-17-05 | 10:20 AM
  #60  
2a+RoN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
From: chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by the7
thanks dude, but getting the material isnt the problem. i think ill by local i live in australia
its more constucting the wastegate plumbing to flow large volumes of gas, so i can control my boost pressure

any threads i couldnt find in the search

this thread has a lot of good info in it: https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...tegate+runners
Old 02-17-05 | 03:48 PM
  #61  
Carl Byck's Avatar
Mad Man
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 2
From: Big Island Hawaii
If you keep the angle of incidence, and the diameter of the tubing equal to that of the main runners you will have no problems controlling boost as it relates to the manifold. Carl
Old 02-18-05 | 05:25 AM
  #62  
the7's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: australia
Originally Posted by Carl Byck
If you keep the "angle of incidence"{ Carl
can elaborate on this for me!

are you trying to tell me to plumb the W/G runner as close to parrallel as practical with the main runner?


that link is exteremly helpful and i think i know what tact im am going to take to fix it. dont think i will plumb the valve into the tubine housing unless it is absolutely necessary tho!!!
Old 02-18-05 | 10:35 AM
  #63  
pistonsuk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 685
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
"angle of incidence"

yes this is the angle in which the wg runners branch from the main runners. minimize this.

my first manifold had 1in runners "T"d in and worked fine until i upgraded my 2.5inch catback to 3inch. then it creeped above 5K. when i reduced my angle of incidence to an angle nearly equal to the angle heading torwards the turbo itself this probelm was solved.

in summary, (on a rotary) make your wg runners nearly equally accessable to flow as the turbo.

justin
Old 02-19-05 | 08:33 AM
  #64  
the7's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: australia
Originally Posted by pistonsuk
yes this is the angle in which the wg runners branch from the main runners. minimize this.

my first manifold had 1in runners "T"d in and worked fine until i upgraded my 2.5inch catback to 3inch. then it creeped above 5K. when i reduced my angle of incidence to an angle nearly equal to the angle heading torwards the turbo itself this probelm was solved.

in summary, (on a rotary) make your wg runners nearly equally accessable to flow as the turbo.

justin
Ahh though so thanks mate!!
i'll do that.
im running a big exhaust as well 3 1/2". if i still have troubles i think that i will drop it back to 3" and go a lower a/r housing .
Old 10-16-06 | 11:36 PM
  #65  
4CN Air's Avatar
DETH TRP
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan Beach, CA
a larger a/r would actually help control boost correct? A larger turbine housing uses more of the exhaust and therefore needs to vent less through w/g(s)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
12-08-15 02:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 PM.