506HP, 356lb-ft on GT35R :) at 1.1BAR
#2
Senior Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
People around here aren't that comfortable with back calculated crank horsepower figures. Drivetrain losses during pull are entirely different than those during deceleration.
Power measured at wheels appears to be around 350 WHP and its hard to believe, well impossible, that drivetrain losses are worth of 150 HP![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Nevertheless, give us more details about engine, fuel system etc.
Power measured at wheels appears to be around 350 WHP and its hard to believe, well impossible, that drivetrain losses are worth of 150 HP
![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Nevertheless, give us more details about engine, fuel system etc.
Trending Topics
#11
Senior Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
Thread Starter
Guys,
I was just about to share my figures with you, nothing else. The Dyno used is the one used by German car makers like BMW, Benz, Porsche, etc..... The Dyno maker is very famous over here, so the fugures you see, are the one you might see in a catalog of a new BMW M5. Same dyno- maker, same software and correction. To all the haters and non believers Fu*** you and learn to build engines and tune cars.
For the fuel.... 4x 850cc injectors at 3.5BAR base pressure were used. However, the injectors were running 100% which is not what I would recommend to anyone. The injectors were just back from cleaning and therm were flow tested at 920cc/min at 3BAR.
I would love to have you over here to get to the same dyno to compare as I seldom have seen figures on this forum related to the real RWHP. Many high HP figures I have seen here were SAE corrected so please be more polite to other sharing there numbers.
Thanks and REgards.
I was just about to share my figures with you, nothing else. The Dyno used is the one used by German car makers like BMW, Benz, Porsche, etc..... The Dyno maker is very famous over here, so the fugures you see, are the one you might see in a catalog of a new BMW M5. Same dyno- maker, same software and correction. To all the haters and non believers Fu*** you and learn to build engines and tune cars.
For the fuel.... 4x 850cc injectors at 3.5BAR base pressure were used. However, the injectors were running 100% which is not what I would recommend to anyone. The injectors were just back from cleaning and therm were flow tested at 920cc/min at 3BAR.
I would love to have you over here to get to the same dyno to compare as I seldom have seen figures on this forum related to the real RWHP. Many high HP figures I have seen here were SAE corrected so please be more polite to other sharing there numbers.
Thanks and REgards.
#13
Senior Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
Thread Starter
just one thing to think about... If someone is claiming to hit 500 with A-Spec kit, they are ppl. to believe. So become a believer or not, this is up to you, anyway.
Best REgards,
#15
Senior Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
Thread Starter
2nd: not sure how you calculate, you need to multiply by 1.36 and you will get straight to 506.6
3rd: thanks for that, It has been corrected
#16
tard of teh century
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
DIN 70020 is just a correction method, the bhp or whp question is just him asking if the number is rated at your flywheel or your drive wheels. Since you said that the numbers are the same as manufacturers that would imply flywheel. Also, what brand dyno were you using and was it a chassis or engine dyno?
PS is metric horsepower which is a slight bit higher than imperical hp, hence the 506 vs 500
PS is metric horsepower which is a slight bit higher than imperical hp, hence the 506 vs 500
#19
Senior Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
Thread Starter
For the Dyno, it is a MAHA dyno. MAHA Maschinenbau Haldenwang GmbH & Co KG - LPS 3000
Best REgards,
#21
Senior Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the fuel.... 4x 850cc injectors at 3.5BAR base pressure were used. However, the injectors were running 100% which is not what I would recommend to anyone. The injectors were just back from cleaning and then were flow tested at 920cc/min at 3BAR.
I would love to have you over here to get to the same dyno to compare as I seldom have seen figures on this forum related to the real RWHP. Many high HP figures I have seen here were SAE corrected so please be more polite to other sharing there numbers.
Thanks and REgards.
I would love to have you over here to get to the same dyno to compare as I seldom have seen figures on this forum related to the real RWHP. Many high HP figures I have seen here were SAE corrected so please be more polite to other sharing there numbers.
Thanks and REgards.
You should clarify that 506 HP figure is sum of wheel power and measured losses, with applied correction factor and represents flywheel power. What was actual measured power before correction?
Reason why I ask is that I did a bit of research on MAHA dynos, and 2wd vehicles of similar power level had drivetrain loss worth of 75 HP, your approaches 130 HP at 8k rpms.
Still, its very high power figure for given boost level. Is the engine ported? Give us more details and post whole dyno print out with ambient conditions, otherwise its just piece of toilet paper
![Ghost Wink](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#23
Is that the American way? To have a huge turbo and plenty of fuel will take to NOWHERE without having other components to suit it. Getting power of an engine is a balance of many factors not just turbo and fuel...
To all the haters and non believers Fu*** you and learn to build engines and tune cars
And again, turbo choice, (SEE "HUGE TURBO/FUEL NEEDS @ TOP") is either A) dependent on their driving "style" or B) chosen for the purpose the car is being built whether it be modified twins for a more linear power band say for touge or a large turbo that throws down huge power in the top end that is more suitable for much more "linear" type driving. And of course, there is always option C) Where the turbo was chosen due to unknown/mislead/unsure etc reasons.. but that is a different thread.
without having other components to suit it.
You just received my first "feedback" rant on this forum, thanks
![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Last edited by TougeSpirit; 09-26-12 at 10:34 PM.
#25
Guys, why are you arguing? We all know the car isn't making 500 rwhp on a 35R at that boost level.
The car is making 351 rwhp according to the dyno sheet. Rad = wheel, which means rwhp. Car is slow for a 35R, end of thread.
You sir are extremely uninformed. Fuel directly relates to power. The more air your motor breaths in (via mods/setup), the more fuel its going to need which directly translates to power. More air = more fuel needed = more power (assuming tuning is equally optimal). It is impossible to make 500 rwhp on 4x850cc injectors as your only source of fuel.
I'd also venture to guess that the power spike at the end has to due with the motor leaning out up top from lack of fuel. Rebuild thread coming up shortly.
thewird
The car is making 351 rwhp according to the dyno sheet. Rad = wheel, which means rwhp. Car is slow for a 35R, end of thread.
I'd also venture to guess that the power spike at the end has to due with the motor leaning out up top from lack of fuel. Rebuild thread coming up shortly.
thewird