460 rwhp at 17psi ( 1.15 bar ) TURBO ????
#1
460 rwhp at 17psi ( 1.15 bar ) TURBO ????
Guys, i prepare a new engine with :
3mm hurley racing apex seals
street porting
Greddy fmic
koyo rad
hks twin power
magnecor 16 bit wires
3 inch full exh
sard 280 lt/h in tank
sard fuel reg
850 prim
1300 sec
PFC + datallog
avcr boost contoller
etc....
As i know with (850+1300cc) = 4300cc total flow and 85% duty cycle can produce 460hp at the wheels. I would like to know which is the ideal turbo ( efficiency )to put down this power with 17 psi ( 1,15 bar of boost ) ?
Thanks.
3mm hurley racing apex seals
street porting
Greddy fmic
koyo rad
hks twin power
magnecor 16 bit wires
3 inch full exh
sard 280 lt/h in tank
sard fuel reg
850 prim
1300 sec
PFC + datallog
avcr boost contoller
etc....
As i know with (850+1300cc) = 4300cc total flow and 85% duty cycle can produce 460hp at the wheels. I would like to know which is the ideal turbo ( efficiency )to put down this power with 17 psi ( 1,15 bar of boost ) ?
Thanks.
#4
sevenin if you have the money go for the new Apexi AX75F92 or a T51R-KAI, they will give you those numbers although i don't know how laggy they will be. Otherwise a well tuned T78 with a bit more boost.
#6
Originally posted by $150FC
maybe a T78 with a 88mm GT40R compressor wheel? some guys have used this, they are happy with it apparently.
maybe a T78 with a 88mm GT40R compressor wheel? some guys have used this, they are happy with it apparently.
Trending Topics
#10
t78 is what you want, 400 plus is right around its efficiancy. smaller turbos you are going to have to spin the **** out of and will probably wear out faster, not to mention create more heat. Bigger turbos will be more laggy.
#11
Originally posted by sevenin7
Jason , tell me your opinion about the turbo kit (460rwhp with 1.15 bar )!
Jason , tell me your opinion about the turbo kit (460rwhp with 1.15 bar )!
Jason
#13
soon, soon ...the GT40 is farily new and the GT40R (Ball bearing) are not even in full production yet... im sure in do time people will have GT40/GT40R dynos
Originally posted by Jason
Someone needs to cough up a GT40 dyno graph and backup the "its as good as the T-78" claims.
Someone needs to cough up a GT40 dyno graph and backup the "its as good as the T-78" claims.
#14
Originally posted by sevenin7
Jason , do you suggest me the T-78 , or something else ?
Jason , do you suggest me the T-78 , or something else ?
If you are looking for a complete setup the XS T04S kit is the most complete. Makes good HP and comes with intercooler piping and blow off valve. Best bang for the buck.
Jason
#17
At that boost level and your HP goal you really need to go large on the turbo. Even then your not garrenteed 460 at 17 psi. Thats a LOAD of power also. Expect to have some fierce mods for the driveline.
#18
TO4R, GT40R, T78, T-51R Kai or SPL, T88, PT67. You have several choices that are capable of what you are looking for. Alot of it will come down to your tuning and how much lag you are willing to have. Although shooting for numbers like that, lag shouldn't be that much of a consideration for you.
Jason, rx7tt95 posted dyno graphs of his standard bearing GT4082 in this forum. He put down 410 at 15psi and that was with a/f's in the 10's from what I remember. Just remember that's the smaller of the GT40 compressor wheels too. Just wanted to point that out since you asked about dyno graphs. Laterz.
Zach
Jason, rx7tt95 posted dyno graphs of his standard bearing GT4082 in this forum. He put down 410 at 15psi and that was with a/f's in the 10's from what I remember. Just remember that's the smaller of the GT40 compressor wheels too. Just wanted to point that out since you asked about dyno graphs. Laterz.
Zach
#22
You seem to be mis-leading him along the lines of tuning. Your comment "He put down 410 at 15psi and that was with a/f's in the 10's from what I remember" leads him to believe he can make alot more power with higher a/r ratios(11.0's), yet raising A/F ratio only give a minimal increase in HP gains, where most of the extra power is made is in timing i.e. proper timing, zeroing split, minimal split ect. Enough said just want to set that straight.
#24
Do you happen to have a dyno sheet of that? Just curious at the powerband.
Originally posted by ismaelruiz
I made 453 rwhp with a Turbonetics 62-1 with .96 on center exhaust housing and P trim at 16-17 psi. It is a very reliable turbo. The car is a daily driven FC.
I made 453 rwhp with a Turbonetics 62-1 with .96 on center exhaust housing and P trim at 16-17 psi. It is a very reliable turbo. The car is a daily driven FC.