Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

4 Port Fuel Rail Experience on Xcessive LIM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-08 | 12:39 AM
  #26  
S3DF's Avatar
Full Member

 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally Posted by ryan1
I e-mailed FJO and they confirmed it will work as I thought:

If I understand correctly, one EMS channel will drive 2 injector driver
channels? The paired channels will be a 1000 and a 1680? If this is correct,
what will happen is that each injector will open and close at the same time
[ignoring very slight differences in opening/closing response of the 2
injectors]. The difference will be that the 1000 will flow less than the
1680. What you have effectively created is a 2680cc super injector for each
rotor and the duty cycle of the injector will be what ever the EMS's duty
cycle is. Idle adjustment may be a bit of a problem with that fuel flow.
I understand the function of the FJO, Its just a resistor box. What's bothering me is this 850/1680=0.50 and 850/1000=0.85 you can only input one or the other, so if the 1000cc is running 85% duty cycle does it mean the 1680cc is running 50% duty cycle or one set of secondaries are running right and the other is not?
Old 05-01-08 | 12:45 AM
  #27  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,354
Likes: 257
From: Bend, OR
I'm not aguing this wouldn't work, but I wonder if it's a good idea to send 1550ccs of fuel into the primary intake runners/ports and 1680ccs of fuel into the secondaries. I don't have enough data to back it up, but from a glance it seems that the secondary intake runners and ports should be seeing more airflow than the primaries. If this is the case, it would make more sense to send more fuel into the secondaries.



Here's what we know:
Stock injector sizes are 550/850. That's a 39/61 ratio, and if Mazda sized their fuel system properly we can assume the primary/secondary airflow through the stock runners and ports was something around 40/60 also.

Your proposed sizes are 1550/1680. That's about a 48/52 ratio, which might work well if your primary runners and ports are about the same size as your secondary runners and ports. It not, you might try something smaller than 1000ccs for the additional primary injectors.

1100/1680 will keep your fuel ratio around 40/60, you could accomplish that with two sets of 550cc injectors in the primary runners.

-s-


edit: not sure I understand how your fuel injectors will be installed. If you're planning to install both the 1000cc's and the 1680cc's in the secondary intake runners (two injectors per runner?) then you'd have 550/2680, which is a 17/83 ratio. Seems like you would have a whole lot more fuel going into the secondary runner, unless the PFC lets you run a different duty cycle for the primaries and secondaries (not sure as I have a different EMS).

Last edited by scotty305; 05-01-08 at 12:58 AM.
Old 05-19-08 | 07:33 PM
  #28  
Jodeny's Avatar
Indifferent
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Long Island,NY
Originally Posted by pp13bnos
I know that Ralph at GZ runs 4 1680s, and 850 primarys off of the pfc. From what he said, the injector drivers would be the first thing to go in the power fc. How he does it, I don't know. CJ
Her uns the four 1680's in series without resistors or an injector driver. He uses 850's in the primaries. No issues for the past few years.
John
Old 05-19-08 | 09:01 PM
  #29  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally Posted by S3DF
I wouldn't send the rail to Keith. I send mine to Rich because Keith was going to charge more.
Yea because everyone knows the cheapest guy in town is the best...
Old 06-03-09 | 11:19 PM
  #30  
1ROTOR2NV's Avatar
5th is most fun

 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Alberta Canada
So is there a difinitive ultimate injector setup, with regards to having enough fuel available while being able to have a reasonable idle. Is 4 injectors in Cjs secondary rail ample for 650 whp while still maintaining a reasonable idle , using the power FC. If not , please explain.
Old 06-04-09 | 02:30 AM
  #31  
Sarusanj's Avatar
QM



iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
I'm going to run 4 1000's in the secondary if I can ever get my hands on a CJM rail kit. :/
Old 06-04-09 | 02:35 AM
  #32  
AnthonyNYC's Avatar
Stay tuned...
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1997
Posts: 2,917
Likes: 1
From: West Islip, Long Island NY
Originally Posted by Sarusanj
I'm going to run 4 1000's in the secondary if I can ever get my hands on a CJM rail kit. :/
I just picked up the KG Parts secondary rail for 4 injectors from Keith this week, installing this weekend on a ground zero lower intake manifold.

Anthony
Old 06-04-09 | 10:24 AM
  #33  
Davin's Avatar
Back door, no babies...
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 3
From: LA, DC & Philly
so if i go with 6 yaw power 1000cc injectors, would i be safe? would i just wire the secondaries in parallel and divide by half to get everything right? i am such a noob and not really sure what to buy
Old 03-20-12 | 10:27 PM
  #34  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
Anyone else try their primaries in the Xcessive manifold. I'm leaning in this direction for my new setup with four ID2000's.
Old 03-20-12 | 11:18 PM
  #35  
ryan1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 558
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo, IA
I switched to e85 and changed injectors to fic (same as id) 950cc pri and 4 2150 sec., works with no issues.
Old 03-21-12 | 06:20 AM
  #36  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
Originally Posted by ryan1
I switched to e85 and changed injectors to fic (same as id) 950cc pri and 4 2150 sec., works with no issues.
That's a lot of fuel! What base pressure are you running? I've got limited E85 pumps in my area, so my setup will have to be flex fueled and I'd worry about drowning the engine with regular old premium at that point. Also which ECU are you using for this setup?
Old 03-21-12 | 11:03 AM
  #37  
ryan1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 558
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo, IA
Originally Posted by the_glass_man
That's a lot of fuel! What base pressure are you running? I've got limited E85 pumps in my area, so my setup will have to be flex fueled and I'd worry about drowning the engine with regular old premium at that point. Also which ECU are you using for this setup?
It is a lot of fuel, but I was tired of changing injectors when I changed turbos and upped the boost. I'm running 50 psi base pressure, I wouldn't worry about drowning it the new injectors have much more precise control then old style ones. Running an AEM.
Old 03-26-12 | 10:40 PM
  #38  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,354
Likes: 257
From: Bend, OR
Originally Posted by the_glass_man
Anyone else try their primaries in the Xcessive manifold. I'm leaning in this direction for my new setup with four ID2000's.


I've been running ID1000's in the Xcessive LIM for a couple of years now. The OEM primaries are blocked off using Racing Beat 13B plugs, which fit well once they were trimmed an inch or two. The idle and throttle response aren't noticeably different than when the stock injectors were installed. This is on a stock 13B-REW, by the way.

Last edited by scotty305; 03-26-12 at 10:43 PM.
Old 03-26-12 | 10:47 PM
  #39  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
Originally Posted by scotty305
I've been running ID1000's in the Xcessive LIM for a couple of years now. The OEM primaries are blocked off using Racing Beat 13B plugs, which fit well once they were trimmed an inch or two. The idle and throttle response aren't noticeably different than when the stock injectors were installed. This is on a stock 13B-REW, by the way.
Thanks, that's just the information I was looking for. I'm going to simplify my setup and remove the primary rail and lines and run 4 ID2000's in the Xcessive manifold instead.
Old 03-28-12 | 12:07 AM
  #40  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,354
Likes: 257
From: Bend, OR
Some Honda engines have a very simple fuel rail, the fuel pressure regulator bolts to a flange at the end of the fuel rail. I picked up an aftermarket Honda FPR, fabricated a simple flange and had it welded to the end of the Xcessive fuel rail... luckily the flange can be flat, since the o-ring groove is built into the pressure regulator. There are only two fuel lines in the engine bay: the feed goes into the front of the fuel rail, and the return comes straight out of the regulator on the other side of the rail.
Attached Thumbnails 4 Port Fuel Rail Experience on Xcessive LIM-xs-029b.jpg  
Old 06-04-12 | 01:07 PM
  #41  
LongRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: Yukon, OK USA
Originally Posted by the_glass_man
Thanks, that's just the information I was looking for. I'm going to simplify my setup and remove the primary rail and lines and run 4 ID2000's in the Xcessive manifold instead.
Have you done this and if so, how did it turn out? Pics?

I'm waiting on my Xcessive LIM and was thinking of going this route to simply setup. 4 FIC 2150 injectors in Xcessive LIM and eliminating the Primary rail....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
11-15-17 08:44 AM



Quick Reply: 4 Port Fuel Rail Experience on Xcessive LIM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.