NSX vs C5 Corvette (almost died)
#26
Originally Posted by Rotary Noob
Even considering that you had the top model, with 290 horse, before the 80 shot, thats still only 370, and from what you say, stock gearing. And the weight is about 3100 pounds.
What youre saying really doesnt add up dude, 370 hp, with 3100 lbs, vs 400 hp, and 3200 lbs. Not to mention that the LS2 puts out more torque than the V6 you have in the NSX.
Driver in the Vette must have sucked.
I would have to see this one to believe it.
What youre saying really doesnt add up dude, 370 hp, with 3100 lbs, vs 400 hp, and 3200 lbs. Not to mention that the LS2 puts out more torque than the V6 you have in the NSX.
Driver in the Vette must have sucked.
I would have to see this one to believe it.
#27
Rotor Nut.
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
yup convertables weight a good amount more. so its believable. and whats with all this gearing talk, they are not mustangs. special gears dont make your car that much faster. they will slightly help your acceleration while hurting your top end.
#28
Convertibles weigh less than 50lbs more thank coupes. They weigh less than one hundred pounds more than a Z06. (That's holding all other accessories constant)
I'm not kidding, look it up. They don't make convertible frames like they used to.
I'm not kidding, look it up. They don't make convertible frames like they used to.
#29
why is it so hard to believe that a nsx can beat a zo6 whats the big deal i mean i seen a 85 ford escort beat a viper ive seen a honda civic hatch back beat a vett ive even seen a prowler beat a veat so why is it hard that a nsx beat a vett there not all that really the nsx is a very fast car even for it to be a v6 its fast because its a light car its not impossible to beat a corvette its really not
#32
He didnt' race a z06, it was a C6 convertible we already figured that out. I would call bs if he said it was a C6 Z06 and was running less than ~200 shot of nitrous.
I didn't say I don't believe him. I'm just trying to flush out why he won. That's why I asked how much nitrous he had. I'm willing to bet the "driver mod" had a lot to do with it, which is actually a compliment to him when you think about it.
Yeah, the convertibles dont weigh as much because chevy made the subframe so rigid for handling, that they weren't required to add much to make the convertible safe. Plus all the convertible top components have become much lighter over the years.
I didn't say I don't believe him. I'm just trying to flush out why he won. That's why I asked how much nitrous he had. I'm willing to bet the "driver mod" had a lot to do with it, which is actually a compliment to him when you think about it.
Yeah, the convertibles dont weigh as much because chevy made the subframe so rigid for handling, that they weren't required to add much to make the convertible safe. Plus all the convertible top components have become much lighter over the years.
#34
NO PISTONS i agree regardless if its a c or a z06 i remember when i had my merkur xr4ti and i use to smoke mustangs with my stock 2.3 l turbo and people didnt believe me until they saw me doing it man i loved that car
#36
Originally Posted by NO PISTONS
ok people crazier things have happened and check what it says that all kills are welcome on the forum even if the vette driver sucked, it was his fault anyways.
so stop wining
and nice kill man
so stop wining
and nice kill man
Seriously, just look at the numbers. Most C6s run around a mid to high 12 bone stock (C6 Z06s run 11s). Most NSXs, depending on the year (which he never specified) run anywhere between a low 13 to a low 14. An 80 shot of nitrous could very well make up that difference, but it more than warrants some questioning.
Once again, not calling him a liar, but god forbid he should be asked to substantiate his claim on a car forum.
#37
Originally Posted by Rotary Noob
Even considering that you had the top model, with 290 horse, before the 80 shot, thats still only 370, and from what you say, stock gearing. And the weight is about 3100 pounds.
What youre saying really doesnt add up dude, 370 hp, with 3100 lbs, vs 400 hp, and 3200 lbs. Not to mention that the LS2 puts out more torque than the V6 you have in the NSX.
Driver in the Vette must have sucked.
I would have to see this one to believe it.
What youre saying really doesnt add up dude, 370 hp, with 3100 lbs, vs 400 hp, and 3200 lbs. Not to mention that the LS2 puts out more torque than the V6 you have in the NSX.
Driver in the Vette must have sucked.
I would have to see this one to believe it.
lol... if it was a torqueless rx-7 down 30hp its expected to always win though huh, guys?
#40
Originally Posted by gregariousgreg
XR4Tis are cool. It's not really surprising you beat a few mustangs in it. Doesn't it have the same turbo 2.3liter that the Turbo SVO fox-bodies had?
#41
YEA that was the only thing but right before it was taking from me i was going to drop a 5.0 rebuilt motor with a big huge turbo and intercooler with the t4 tranny it was going to give me 400 whp man i was going to love it and it was rwd now i really want to cry i miss that car that is the only ford i would drive reason is, because its german made
#42
Not hard to believe that the vette was reeling him in, and I mentioned the driver. The one in the vette must have sucked and spun the hell out of his tires in first. He probably hooked up halfway through, or even as far as second gear.
Im just saying, with that weight difference, the power difference, and the amount of torque that both have, the vette (with a decent driver) WILL win.
30 hp, about 100 ftlbs of torque, and 100 lbs of weight. Thats a slightly BIG difference in a street car. I played with an NSX one time in my 01 Z06, he never stood a chance.
I would still have to see this to believe it. I know how much wheelspin a vette can have if you dump too much torque to the wheels from a dig. 2k and up and youll spin at least halfway, if you feather the gas. 2.5 and up, you might as well just roll down your windows and wave.
Im just saying, with that weight difference, the power difference, and the amount of torque that both have, the vette (with a decent driver) WILL win.
30 hp, about 100 ftlbs of torque, and 100 lbs of weight. Thats a slightly BIG difference in a street car. I played with an NSX one time in my 01 Z06, he never stood a chance.
I would still have to see this to believe it. I know how much wheelspin a vette can have if you dump too much torque to the wheels from a dig. 2k and up and youll spin at least halfway, if you feather the gas. 2.5 and up, you might as well just roll down your windows and wave.
#43
I'm not gettin on your case at all or anything though, but you're still thinking in "ideal" situations. The street/street cars/street environment/driver abilities are far from ideal.
#44
Originally Posted by smokie
YEA that was the only thing but right before it was taking from me i was going to drop a 5.0 rebuilt motor with a big huge turbo and intercooler with the t4 tranny it was going to give me 400 whp man i was going to love it and it was rwd now i really want to cry i miss that car that is the only ford i would drive reason is, because its german made
as well if you could only squeeze 400rwhp out of a turbo 5.0...that's just sad, I've seen guys get 385 N/A hp
#45
Originally Posted by gregariousgreg
Who should really stop whining? This is a kill section on an internet car forum. The kind of place that is notorious for sceptisism.
Seriously, just look at the numbers. Most C6s run around a mid to high 12 bone stock (C6 Z06s run 11s). Most NSXs, depending on the year (which he never specified) run anywhere between a low 13 to a low 14. An 80 shot of nitrous could very well make up that difference, but it more than warrants some questioning.
Once again, not calling him a liar, but god forbid he should be asked to substantiate his claim on a car forum.
Seriously, just look at the numbers. Most C6s run around a mid to high 12 bone stock (C6 Z06s run 11s). Most NSXs, depending on the year (which he never specified) run anywhere between a low 13 to a low 14. An 80 shot of nitrous could very well make up that difference, but it more than warrants some questioning.
Once again, not calling him a liar, but god forbid he should be asked to substantiate his claim on a car forum.
well rotary noob is doing a good job of that.
not to be mean and disrespect rotary noob because i know you have a corvette
but you seem mad that he beat a corvette and try to say everything you know to make it seem like the best.
if i were you i would forget it and congradulate the guy
give him some credit
#46
Originally Posted by 93VRTouring
errr...if you were going to put a 5.0 in an XR4Ti, it's a good thing it was taken from you..
as well if you could only squeeze 400rwhp out of a turbo 5.0...that's just sad, I've seen guys get 385 N/A hp
as well if you could only squeeze 400rwhp out of a turbo 5.0...that's just sad, I've seen guys get 385 N/A hp