Race Car Tech Discuss anything related to road racing and auto X.

water/meth injection nozzle location

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-10 | 01:28 AM
  #1  
initial D is REAL!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena
water/meth injection nozzle location

I always thought the water/meth injection was always placed either in front of each port or a single nozzle in front of the throttle body.
My buddy said he is going water/meth injection on his car, and his tuner was going to place the nozzle near the turbo. He wasn't quiet sure, his car knowledge is limited. He said at the turbo near the air filter, or the hotpipe before the intercooler. Anyone heard of this? I was thinking most of the water would condense on the intercooler fins. Of course the air charge would be extra cool, but I learned about water injection when people were spraying directly to the engine.
Old 06-17-10 | 08:26 AM
  #2  
nofords's Avatar
Mr. September FB 2011

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Many install it before the inercooler to increase the exhange of heat through the intercooler.

Idealy, you want it after the blades of the TB to allow the intake charge to better atomize the water/meth before it enters the combustion chambers.

Placing it before the turbo is a great way to atomize the mixture however it is an even better way to destroy the blades as the water will pit the turbo. DO NOT under any circumstances, do this.
Old 06-17-10 | 09:33 AM
  #3  
Islander's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 814
Likes: 7
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by nofords
Many install it before the inercooler to increase the exhange of heat through the intercooler.

Idealy, you want it after the blades of the TB to allow the intake charge to better atomize the water/meth before it enters the combustion chambers.

Placing it before the turbo is a great way to atomize the mixture however it is an even better way to destroy the blades as the water will pit the turbo. DO NOT under any circumstances, do this.


Many people have had great success running pre-turbo water injection. Do your research and you will find out more than you need to know. I dont agree with "nofords, DO NOT do it theory". But to each his own. Go to the auxiliary injection forum and read, read, read!
Old 06-17-10 | 12:04 PM
  #4  
initial D is REAL!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena
so I'm wondering about the atomization of preturbo injection then.
Old 06-17-10 | 04:09 PM
  #5  
nofords's Avatar
Mr. September FB 2011

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Perhaps others have.

Knowing lots of S/C and Turbo cars that have pre-compressor injection with detrimental results.

In s/c cars for example, it removes the teflon off the blades because of the bursting water droplets when they hit the screw tips. In a turbo, the same is true except there is no "protective coating."

Do what you want, I personally spray post turbo on another car I own with years of success. (also using the cheaper blue windshield washer fluid mix on this car!) Others have known to get 6mos out of a turbo before the induction housing shows signs similar to prop cavitation pitting.

As already stated...read read read!

Good Luck!
Old 06-21-10 | 12:13 AM
  #6  
The Shaolin's Avatar
Canned. I got CORNED!

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Appleton, WI
Any issues spraying before the IAT? My haltech IAT has an exposed element and looks fragile.
Old 06-26-10 | 11:35 PM
  #7  
nofords's Avatar
Mr. September FB 2011

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Originally Posted by The Shaolin
Any issues spraying before the IAT? My haltech IAT has an exposed element and looks fragile.
I would imagine that it is not a good idea to mist an open element IAT
Old 07-02-10 | 02:59 PM
  #8  
phantom works's Avatar
17,600 hp everyday!

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
nozzle location

I tapped my nozzle right before the Throttle body into my GReddy elbow. I have experienced no problems with this location and I track my car as well.
Old 07-02-10 | 03:11 PM
  #9  
Force13B's Avatar
No more G6
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 1
From: Nipomo, California
If you check out dudemaaan's thread over at RCC it goes into a lot of detail about preturbo mechanical water injection. I don't think i'd want to spray 100% meth preturbo something about compressing a very flammable fuel doesn't sound right.
Old 07-02-10 | 03:17 PM
  #10  
Force13B's Avatar
No more G6
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 1
From: Nipomo, California
Originally Posted by nofords
Placing it before the turbo is a great way to atomize the mixture however it is an even better way to destroy the blades as the water will pit the turbo. DO NOT under any circumstances, do this.
sure
http://www.wannaspeed.com/index.php?...roducts_id=181
Old 07-05-10 | 12:01 PM
  #11  
Gene's Avatar
10 lb. boost, 5lb. bag
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: New York, NY
I've seen this argument before, and I come down on the side of "don't put it in front of the turbo because of pitting the blades." I remembered that I have a copy of Maximum Boost by Corky Bell, which I haven't read in forever, so I cracked it open to see what he has to say:

"The water injector is not a very interesting device. It has little place in a properly conceived turbo system. Two circumstances are viable for a water injector: a 1970 home-built Vega turbo with a draw-through carb, or a Roots supercharger sitting between a huge engine and two huger (really big) carburetors. To stake the margin of safety of a turbocharged engine on an inherently unreliable device is an idea whose time has long since passed. RIP."

"Rule: A water injector on a turbo car is a poor-excuse band-aid for not doing the job correctly the first time."

"Don't be too hasty to create a margin of safety on detonation based on an unreliable device. Water injection is best used when boost levels over 6 PSI are desired but no intercooler is present. Do not allow a situation to exist where the water injector is used as an excuse for improper air/fuel ratios. All things considered, you would be far ahead never to have heard of a water injector."

So there's that to consider. His stance makes great sense from a race car engineering standpoint. On a race car you want to eliminate anything that has the potential to break and cause you a DNF that you can get away with. If your setup is configured such that losing the water system would blow you up, you probably shouldn't be using it.
Old 07-05-10 | 08:34 PM
  #12  
turbotoaster's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: England
Originally Posted by Gene
I've seen this argument before, and I come down on the side of "don't put it in front of the turbo because of pitting the blades." I remembered that I have a copy of Maximum Boost by Corky Bell, which I haven't read in forever, so I cracked it open to see what he has to say:

"The water injector is not a very interesting device. It has little place in a properly conceived turbo system. Two circumstances are viable for a water injector: a 1970 home-built Vega turbo with a draw-through carb, or a Roots supercharger sitting between a huge engine and two huger (really big) carburetors. To stake the margin of safety of a turbocharged engine on an inherently unreliable device is an idea whose time has long since passed. RIP."

"Rule: A water injector on a turbo car is a poor-excuse band-aid for not doing the job correctly the first time."

"Don't be too hasty to create a margin of safety on detonation based on an unreliable device. Water injection is best used when boost levels over 6 PSI are desired but no intercooler is present. Do not allow a situation to exist where the water injector is used as an excuse for improper air/fuel ratios. All things considered, you would be far ahead never to have heard of a water injector."

So there's that to consider. His stance makes great sense from a race car engineering standpoint. On a race car you want to eliminate anything that has the potential to break and cause you a DNF that you can get away with. If your setup is configured such that losing the water system would blow you up, you probably shouldn't be using it.
what!!!

so your saying that noone should run more than 1bar of boost on the street because a book told you not to.

because i dont know of that many people running 1.2bar+ on pump fuel with no water injection, i know i wouldnt want to.

corky talks about piston engines in which case he is mostly right, but for rotary engines you need that bandaid if you want to run decent boost on pump fuel
Old 07-06-10 | 02:16 PM
  #13  
Gene's Avatar
10 lb. boost, 5lb. bag
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: New York, NY
Well, not just any book.

This is the racing section, so I'm talking from a racing standpoint. Adding another system that will blow your motor if something goes wrong is bad mojo.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 08:16 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
09-11-15 01:13 PM
Blk 93
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
09-09-15 11:56 AM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-03-15 08:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.