Fuel starvation in 3rd gen--solutions?
#1
Thread Starter
Re-engineering everything
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
Fuel starvation in 3rd gen--solutions?
So, the left-hand-turn starvation issue is well known. Here are some of the fixes or workaround I've heard:
1) Never run less than 5/8 of a tank -- which sucks for long track days
2) Run a swirl pot or accumulator -- you need another fuel pump, the tank, and a place to mount it
3) Modify the OEM tank (remove volume or install baffles)
4) Run a fuel cell
Are there other solutions I've missed? For those of us who run on the street and the track, 2 and 4 are out. 3 is expensive, and 1 is annoying as hell.
Does anyone have any other ideas?
-ch
1) Never run less than 5/8 of a tank -- which sucks for long track days
2) Run a swirl pot or accumulator -- you need another fuel pump, the tank, and a place to mount it
3) Modify the OEM tank (remove volume or install baffles)
4) Run a fuel cell
Are there other solutions I've missed? For those of us who run on the street and the track, 2 and 4 are out. 3 is expensive, and 1 is annoying as hell.
Does anyone have any other ideas?
-ch
#2
#3 is the cheapest and most elegant solution. A small "tank" that encloses the fuel pickup is built around the stock baffle. The return line would then dump into this tank so the pickup could never starve.
#5
Speed Mach Go Go Go
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
I think this is your # 2 http://www.more-japan.com/product.ph...cat=544&page=1
I thought our tanks allready had baffles to prevent this? Was it not untill the 99+ that they added baffles?
I thought our tanks allready had baffles to prevent this? Was it not untill the 99+ that they added baffles?
#6
Originally Posted by NeoTuri
How would I go about doing #3?
https://www.rx7club.com/race-car-tech-103/fd-gas-tank-baffle-slosh-problem-233215/#post2250917
Trending Topics
#10
Thread Starter
Re-engineering everything
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
For reference, here's the ATL catalog. I'm wondering if something from page 20 could be adapted? (I don't think the fuel tank opening is 5x5x6, but the tanks are 'semi flexible' so...
http://www.atlinc.com/US/download.ph...eCatalog06.pdf
-ch
http://www.atlinc.com/US/download.ph...eCatalog06.pdf
-ch
#11
I seen another racer at the track who put this in his tank. Fuel cell foam.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
He said it fixed the problem he was having.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
He said it fixed the problem he was having.
#13
Thread Starter
Re-engineering everything
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
So the above post: the driver's side of the car is up in that picture. You're looking straight down into the fuel tank. The pump and inlet filter go into this bucket with the fuel level sensor hanging just outside it (down in the picture).
You can also see that there is a little track that runs back and forth in the left and right directions of the car. There is an inlet to the bucket at the end of the track (in the lower right hand corner of the picture).
There are large baffles in the tank, but they look mostly useless in stopping sloshing. Since the bucket (and the pump) are on the left side of the car, left hand turns push all the gas to the right and out of the bucket. Under accel and right hand turns the fuel tends to cover/fill the bucket. (Braking is not an issue because the car isn't under power and the return line is refilling the bucket.)
The bucket is maybe 4" tall. If it were taller, it would probably work more effectively. However, if you do this you can't use the fuel level gauge properly.
But seeing this I don't understand the modifications that the guys were talking about on the other thread...
-ch
You can also see that there is a little track that runs back and forth in the left and right directions of the car. There is an inlet to the bucket at the end of the track (in the lower right hand corner of the picture).
There are large baffles in the tank, but they look mostly useless in stopping sloshing. Since the bucket (and the pump) are on the left side of the car, left hand turns push all the gas to the right and out of the bucket. Under accel and right hand turns the fuel tends to cover/fill the bucket. (Braking is not an issue because the car isn't under power and the return line is refilling the bucket.)
The bucket is maybe 4" tall. If it were taller, it would probably work more effectively. However, if you do this you can't use the fuel level gauge properly.
But seeing this I don't understand the modifications that the guys were talking about on the other thread...
-ch
#14
While I was doing my swap I decided to try and fix this problem as well so I decided to sump the tank, so instead of running one pump I am running 2. I left the stock pump in its place but I also have an inline bosch pump gravity fed by the sump, is this a solution? NO! Definately works better then the one pump in the tank but I wouldn't say it's perfect, I notice minor dips in the fuel pressure(5psi) while going around hard corners the last track event I was at. I only noticed this after the tank was just below half, I have been searching for the cure for this for along time so I am curious to see what you come up with.
BTW I have tried twin pumps in the tank when my car was rotary, tried feeding one pump with another(one intank, to one inline) and nothing worked better then my current setup. I monitor the pressure with a greddy fuel pressure gauge on the pillar mount.
BTW I have tried twin pumps in the tank when my car was rotary, tried feeding one pump with another(one intank, to one inline) and nothing worked better then my current setup. I monitor the pressure with a greddy fuel pressure gauge on the pillar mount.
#16
Originally Posted by darkslide750
I seen another racer at the track who put this in his tank. Fuel cell foam.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
He said it fixed the problem he was having.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
He said it fixed the problem he was having.
#17
Thread Starter
Re-engineering everything
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
Foam is much more about safety than eliminating starvation. Check out the ATL catalog--they install surge tanks in the middle of the foam. I don't think the foam alone is a solution.
-ch
-ch
#18
Originally Posted by hyperion
Paul, can you clarify? You have an external reservoir that has a gravity-fed outlet that goes to another pump? (Like the Rotary Extreme kit?) Where did you put the reservoir?
-ch
-ch
#19
Thread Starter
Re-engineering everything
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
So the inline pump is external?
Can you lay out the path of the fuel flow, such as:
stock pump pickup in tank
stock pump outlet to reservoir
reservoir overflow return to tank
secondary pump pickup in reservoir
secondary pump outlet to FPR
FPR return to reservoir
Or whatever the right routing is...
-ch
Can you lay out the path of the fuel flow, such as:
stock pump pickup in tank
stock pump outlet to reservoir
reservoir overflow return to tank
secondary pump pickup in reservoir
secondary pump outlet to FPR
FPR return to reservoir
Or whatever the right routing is...
-ch
#20
Yes, the inline pump is external. Both pumps are connected to a distribution block, then to an aeromotive fuel filter and from there to a single -8 feed line to the fuel rail. At the end of the second rail I have a FPR, and a return line off the regulator bleeding off the excess fuel with a -6 return.
I am currently thinking of changing my setup, I want to simplify things......possibly a returnless system like the Vette uses.
I am currently thinking of changing my setup, I want to simplify things......possibly a returnless system like the Vette uses.
#21
Thread Starter
Re-engineering everything
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
Ah, thanks for the clarification.
As far as the Vette goes, it's a return-less system in that the FPR is mounted in the tank. (You're doing an LS1, right?) Most people are putting the FPRs just outside the tank or in the engine bay.
I'm wondering if there is room for this under the car:
http://www.lancershop.com/customer/p...?productid=538
You could use the stock pump to fill this, and then put a pump inside that would go out to the FPR. I've no idea how to get specs on this, though. SARD's website is mostly under construction...
-ch
As far as the Vette goes, it's a return-less system in that the FPR is mounted in the tank. (You're doing an LS1, right?) Most people are putting the FPRs just outside the tank or in the engine bay.
I'm wondering if there is room for this under the car:
http://www.lancershop.com/customer/p...?productid=538
You could use the stock pump to fill this, and then put a pump inside that would go out to the FPR. I've no idea how to get specs on this, though. SARD's website is mostly under construction...
-ch
#23
Originally Posted by hyperion
But seeing this I don't understand the modifications that the guys were talking about on the other thread...
#24
Thread Starter
Re-engineering everything
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
Ah, but how did they deal with the fuel level sensor? If you put walls up around the bucket, you'd have to get rid of the sensor...
...or am I missing something?
Also, they never posted the Mazda part number for the top part of the baffle. I'd rather buy than fab.
-ch
...or am I missing something?
Also, they never posted the Mazda part number for the top part of the baffle. I'd rather buy than fab.
-ch
#25
Originally Posted by hyperion
Ah, but how did they deal with the fuel level sensor?