Old School and Other Rotary Old School and Other Rotary Powered Vehicles including performance modifications and technical support

10A RX-3 engine and 12A RX-7 engine ?s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-05 | 03:17 PM
  #1  
BlurComet's Avatar
Thread Starter
OMGWTFBBQ!!! Racing

 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
10A RX-3 engine and 12A RX-7 engine ?s

I was just curious as to the likeness of both of these engines. Yes, they are obviously both Rotaries, but do their exhaust manifolds bolt up to each? Same compression? What about displacement (apparently the 12A has the same liter size as the 10A)?? Rotor heads, go nuts!
Old 09-06-05 | 03:27 PM
  #2  
Crit's Avatar
No distributor? No thanks
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 6
From: Outskirts of Road Atlanta
No, the rough numbers go as follows:

10A = 1.0 liter displacement (500cc per rotor)
12A = 1.2 liter (1148, as I recall)
13B = 1.3 (1308 cc)

They all have the same "stroke" or e-shaft offset (equivalent of a crank), but the "bore" is increased. 10A has 60mm-wide rotors. 12A has 70mm rotors, 13B has 80mm rotors. Because the engines get longer from one series to the next, the exhaust header spacing grows, too. Each one is 10mm longer than the last on the header, 20mm longer overall. Early 10As had side-plate exhaust which would be TOTALLY different, but I think all the RX-3 engines were peripheral exhast.

Basically, the hole pattern height is the same for each series, and 10mm wider between each engine size.
Old 09-06-05 | 06:35 PM
  #3  
BlurComet's Avatar
Thread Starter
OMGWTFBBQ!!! Racing

 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Nice, thanks for the info. I thought that the 10, 12, and 13 designations were from their respective displacements too, but this http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...hp&carnum=1158 says otherwise. Did they post the wrong info?
Old 09-06-05 | 10:19 PM
  #4  
Crit's Avatar
No distributor? No thanks
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 6
From: Outskirts of Road Atlanta
Okay, I finally found what I think you're talking about. There's a typo on the RX-3 that lists the 10A as 1.148 liters. The RX-3 was available as either a 10A or 12A. It's the 12A that's 1148cc. If you look at the RX-2, it lists the 12A as 1148 (70 cubic inches) and any RX-7 shows that the 13B is 1308 at 80 cubic inches.


The displacement on all 10As is the same, whether side-exhaust of peripheral exhaust. 12As are longer and are all the same displacement, whether US-spec, Turboed (jap-spec) or 6-port (also jap-spec), and all 13Bs are the longer still and all the same size, whether carbed, 4-port EFI, 6-port EFI, Turbo, or Twin-turbo. There's tons of varieties, but the displacement never varies for a given engine series.

Last edited by Crit; 09-06-05 at 10:28 PM.
Old 09-07-05 | 12:11 AM
  #5  
BlurComet's Avatar
Thread Starter
OMGWTFBBQ!!! Racing

 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Ok, thanks for clearing that up
Old 09-07-05 | 01:39 AM
  #6  
re10's Avatar
10a *****
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: NZ
RX3 10a's share a number of parts with the 12a... oil seals, oil pump, side seals, water seals, you can run the same stationary gear, and the end plates (if you happen to have some 12a twin dizzy plates which are the same). You can also use a later single dizzy front cover and electronic distributor.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
0
08-18-15 10:01 PM
rx7brandon
General Rotary Tech Support
3
08-16-15 10:55 AM



Quick Reply: 10A RX-3 engine and 12A RX-7 engine ?s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.