New Member RX-7 Technical Post your first technical questions here, in an easy flame free environment, before jumping into the main technical sections.

S5 intake on S4.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-12 | 12:52 AM
  #1  
7rexfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member

 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: TN
S5 intake on S4.

If you put an S5 intake on a S4 engine is there much difference in power?,and if so how much is gained?

Last edited by misterstyx69; 09-25-12 at 05:33 PM.
Old 09-29-12 | 02:42 AM
  #2  
7rexfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member

 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: TN
Is it worth it or stay with s4 intake! I would love to go side draft webers!
Old 09-29-12 | 04:48 AM
  #3  
misterstyx69's Avatar
Retired Moderator, RIP
iTrader: (142)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 133
From: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
it's 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.
If you are having a hard time with EFI and want to go Carb,But you do not have the knowledge of either.Stick with EFI!..
Taking a EFI engine and turning it into a carbed engine is a little trick,but not exactly a nightmare.
The Thing about Carbs it that they need tuning constantly,as the EFI pretty well takes care of itself.
Long story short,If you like to tinker then ya,s5 or carb.If you want to drive the car,then stay S4.
The power increase really isn't worth all the time and aggravation of doing the mod.
Old 09-29-12 | 03:22 PM
  #4  
wthdidusay82's Avatar
Rotary Power
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 4
From: Dinwiddie, Va
The cost/time per HP gained in a na is relatively high, compared to its tough turbo brother .

The best bang for your buck are headers and a catback exhaust. Everything is will yield small results, sure a bunch of mods may give you another 10-15 HP but it'd be cheaper to just do a turbo swap.

rotary > pistons
Old 09-29-12 | 08:04 PM
  #5  
7rexfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member

 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: TN
Thanks for the info I love ta tinker i am a Master ASE and Mercedes tech! So tinkering is my life!! So I think I go with webers! Plus love to watch the air suck in to those webers on real cold mornings when your under the hood! I also like the better atomization of fuel at top end!
Old 09-30-12 | 12:54 AM
  #6  
wthdidusay82's Avatar
Rotary Power
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 4
From: Dinwiddie, Va
If you're good at your stuff and confident go for the s5 intake manifolds.

It will give you more mid-top end power.

There's a writeup on the stickies somewhere.

rotary > pistons
Old 09-30-12 | 11:43 AM
  #7  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,793
Likes: 119
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by 7rexfan
Thanks for the info I love ta tinker i am a Master ASE and Mercedes tech! So tinkering is my life!! So I think I go with webers! Plus love to watch the air suck in to those webers on real cold mornings when your under the hood! I also like the better atomization of fuel at top end!
If you love to tinker, then don't downgrade the car to carburetors.

Upgrade to a Megasquirt to control your stock EFI. Then when you get bored of the stock intake manifold, you can swap to an ITB style. Sure you'll loose all your low end, but it will look like a carburetor...
Old 09-30-12 | 11:06 PM
  #8  
7rexfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member

 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: TN
Thanks Mr Cake but as we all know 7s are not known for there low end torque and power so top end is the whole idea and at the end of the day nothing you can do to an EFI system will give the top end power as carbs! That is way race vehicles have carbs better atomization!
Old 10-01-12 | 12:04 AM
  #9  
BoostedChad's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Toretto's hot rod heaven
Originally Posted by 7rexfan
Thanks Mr Cake but as we all know 7s are not known for there low end torque and power so top end is the whole idea and at the end of the day nothing you can do to an EFI system will give the top end power as carbs! That is way race vehicles have carbs better atomization!
they are switching over slowly to EFI, you have far better control with a injector then you do with a carb. a carb is just a controlled fuel leak.
Old 10-01-12 | 12:55 AM
  #10  
7rexfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member

 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: TN
Forgive me for being old school but there is no way yet and will there be for years that can beat that of a carb at top end! And yes you are right it is a controlled fuel leak! But is still better at producing more horse power at top end speeds then any EFI system!
Old 10-01-12 | 12:59 AM
  #11  
7rexfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member

 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: TN
You see there is just not the atomization with an injector! At top end speeds!
Old 10-01-12 | 11:19 AM
  #12  
jakea's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: west wi
Originally Posted by 7rexfan
Forgive me for being old school but there is no way yet and will there be for years that can beat that of a carb at top end! And yes you are right it is a controlled fuel leak! But is still better at producing more horse power at top end speeds then any EFI system!
I think you need to do some more research regarding efi

carbs are antiquated and wasteful
Old 10-01-12 | 09:39 PM
  #13  
7rexfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member

 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: TN
K well guess all your top fuel racers! And any pro racer for that matter should do the same! Like F1,NASCAR .... Right!
Old 10-01-12 | 10:09 PM
  #14  
ChilliumBromide's Avatar
Charlie
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
why ask a question you don't want to hear the answer to? You asked if a carb is worth it...the answer you got was no...and now you're arguing against that by saying the same thing over and over: top end atomization. Now personally I can't tell you a thing about the atomization differences between a carburetor and fuel injected system, but based on the answers you've gotten, I think it would be worthwhile to look into the benefits of a megasquirt EFI controller versus the more complex process of modifying your engine to fit a carb.
Old 10-01-12 | 10:49 PM
  #15  
wthdidusay82's Avatar
Rotary Power
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 4
From: Dinwiddie, Va
Originally Posted by ChilliumBromide
why ask a question you don't want to hear the answer to? You asked if a carb is worth it...the answer you got was no...and now you're arguing against that by saying the same thing over and over: top end atomization. Now personally I can't tell you a thing about the atomization differences between a carburetor and fuel injected system, but based on the answers you've gotten, I think it would be worthwhile to look into the benefits of a megasquirt EFI controller versus the more complex process of modifying your engine to fit a carb.
Totally true. Carbs aren't that great, if they were they'd still be put in cars.

Edit: they might give a good amount of power but there are way more negatives than positives compared to efi, get independant throttle bodies and a peripheral ported engine using efi and a standalone if you want some real top end. It will scream like a monster



rotary > pistons
Old 10-04-12 | 11:46 PM
  #16  
7rexfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member

 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: TN
Hey thanks for the info Y'all!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.