VA = OBD-II & Tougher Emissions?? (Marylanders, this affects you too!!)
#26
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Peter, you're right...a lot of this stuff IS published. Something about them requiring to disclose to the public the methods they use to enforce the law or something like that?? If you keep your eyes open, it's usually pretty clear on the roadway too. They put up the huge "Speed limit enforced by aircraft" signs right before speedtraps on the highways. They have "Photo Radar In Use" signs one or two lights before traffic lights w/ cameras. They have "Speed Limit Enforced By Radar" signs before targeted enforcement areas and speedtraps. But then again, there are a few other dirty things they do like in my area (Rt 7, past Tysons, heading out toward the Reston/Sterling area) where cops will sit in a turn lane at night WITH ALL THEIR LIGHTS OFF. I mean, not even dim lights. I SWEAR I'm so freakin tempted to jump in the junk car we have at home, and just PLOW into the copcar from behind. And you KNOW I wouldn't be at fault since he's got no lights on at all while being ON the roadway. Too bad the judge would never believe it...
I'm only reporting what the guy informed me. He's a straight-up guy from what I've seen, and being that he's not only an emissions station, but also a certified emissions repair facility, I think he knows what he's talking about.
Directly, maybe not. Indirectly, they absolutely will, by meeting more stringent air quality standards, and requalifying for federal funding.
LOL well said. That's why I'm having trouble fighting the redlight cameras...cuz they show a certain car doing 63 in a 45 LOL.
Originally Posted by cosmicbang
Back to the subject, which contains plenty of unsettling ideas. There seems to be an intention to enforce northern va emissions inspections on vehicles registered in parts of Virginia outside of emission inspection areas, if they regularly commute or drive in emissions inspections areas. For example if your car is registered in, say-Clarke county (non-emissions), but you drive past a remote sensor in Fairfax Co. (emissions) spewing clouds of emissions every day, it would be forced to comply with northern Va emissions testing. So far, there is no law to allow that. There are also suggestions to extend the remote sensing to other parts of the state which have ozone problems. Again, no laws yet to create any teeth. I did not find any plans to extend the program to vehicles over 25 years old.
Presumably after driving past a remote sensor, you would get a notice in the mail and you would have to go to an inspection station to get an emissions test (doubtless at your own expense). The results would clear you until the next time. Expect the state to put a positive spin on this by saying cars observed to be non-polluters would not need the regular annual (or whatever it is) emissions test. Also, believe it or not the state will not make any money on this.
According to the vendor, the remote sensing works best when vehicle is under a load, as on a slight uphill, and the van would presumably be manned by one person. I wonder if there would be police there as well? Another caution the remote sensing will record SPEED and acceleration! Can't you imagine that in court? "Your honour, it my car does not pollute". "Young man you were speeding, so you are obviously a bad-***. Just be glad it is only an emissions ticket, 'Guilty'".
#28
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
I'm only reporting what the guy informed me. He's a straight-up guy from what I've seen, and being that he's not only an emissions station, but also a certified emissions repair facility, I think he knows what he's talking about.
I'm sure they are recording and reporting all vehicles regardless of age and jurisdiction of registration. I have not read of any suggestion to require older cars to meet current standards. Doesn't a 1984 vehicle registered in northern VA already have to meet 1984 emissions standards? (I wouldn't know ) The law currently says cars over 25 years old and older are exempt. There is nothing they can legally do to a 25+ year old car except send a notice saying it has excessive emissions. Likewise, the current law does not extend emissions inspection requirements or penalties beyond cars registered in northern Va. But beware the next legislative session
Directly, maybe not. Indirectly, they absolutely will, by meeting more stringent air quality standards, and requalifying for federal funding.
#29
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by cosmicbang
Your guy may know better what is happening now, but he may be confusing out-of-state cars vs. out-of-emissions-area in-state cars.
Doesn't a 1984 vehicle registered in northern VA already have to meet 1984 emissions standards? (I wouldn't know )
#32
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
Ramy,
What's to stop you from driving down to Richmond etc. and getting your car inspected where there is no smog required...Then just drive back up to D.C. with the new sticker?
What's to stop you from driving down to Richmond etc. and getting your car inspected where there is no smog required...Then just drive back up to D.C. with the new sticker?
#34
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
Ramy,
What's to stop you from driving down to Richmond etc. and getting your car inspected where there is no smog required...Then just drive back up to D.C. with the new sticker?
What's to stop you from driving down to Richmond etc. and getting your car inspected where there is no smog required...Then just drive back up to D.C. with the new sticker?
If the car is registered in a different county outside the emissions area, it does not need an emissions inspection ('nuff said).
Mine are all taken care of also, no problems.
Last edited by cosmicbang; 08-12-05 at 07:59 PM.
#35
Right near Malloy
iTrader: (28)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 513
From: Behind a workbench, repairing FC Electronics.
I'm gonna drive up to one of those remote sensing stations and start dumping oil down the intake of my truck! Let em photograph a huge cloud, or just catch everyone in the general vicinity.
#36
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
afterburn27, I just remembered. In addition to the changes you mentioned, there's one you missed. VA will now allow airbag-equipped vehicles to pass state inspection even if the airbag is not operational or even missing completely - as long as the airbag light is off lol.
#37
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
afterburn27, I just remembered. In addition to the changes you mentioned, there's one you missed. VA will now allow airbag-equipped vehicles to pass state inspection even if the airbag is not operational or even missing completely - as long as the airbag light is off lol.
#38
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
No. It has to meet CURRENT emissions standards. I'm pretty sure of that. My '84 FB is not 25 years old yet, so the standards on it passing are pretty high for it's age.
Sniffer tests are based on the emissions standards of the model year it was manufactured. If that wasn't the case, cars would only have a five to ten year lifespan.
On a sidenote, I just had to register my daily in Richmond so it wouldn't have to pass the sniffer.
I've been passing one of those mobile sniffer vans every day on the way to work, there is one on a 95N onramp in the mixing bowl.
Last edited by Kai; 08-14-05 at 09:49 PM.
#41
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by Kai
Oh hell no. An FB would not pass '05 emissions numbers straight off the factory floor, much less after twenty years of abuse.
Sniffer tests are based on the emissions standards of the model year it was manufactured. If that wasn't the case, cars would only have a five to ten year lifespan.
Sniffer tests are based on the emissions standards of the model year it was manufactured. If that wasn't the case, cars would only have a five to ten year lifespan.
Oh and thanks for the head's up. I'm keeping an eye out for 'em in this area too...
#42
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
My bad. I didn't know that. That makes sense.
DEQ sent around a few fliers to all the emissions testing locations (including my work) that gave me the heads-up on these new laws a couple monthes ago, what a pile. I'm thinking that the 25 year exemption is going to disappear soon considering.
Testing on OBD-II equipped cars is much faster now, the inspectors like that. I've witnessed a few of the first runs at our place... unfortunately the failure rate was high for the first couple days because the cars weren't warmed up enough. We can't charge the customer in that case, so no big deal, it's just an inconvenience.
I'm hoping these roadside checks are going to be easy to fight, like stoplight cameras. I don't need a ticket in the mail telling me my 7 is killing the rain forest and I have to pay for another E-test. Once I get the new engine and Haltech in there, i doubt it will ever be legal again. I can see it now:
Emissions tester: Son, your EGR system is gone.
Me: Yeah, well, the non-turbo EGR valve doesn't fit under the turbo intake manifold, so it obviously couldn't stay.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
06-03-24 04:25 PM