my semi-peripheral project
#52
![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Wink](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
well, the truth is i lost my job and have yet to find a new one, so the engine build is stalled pretty much where my last post left off. i have since moved most of it up to NY with me so that whenever i start working again, it will take first priority (after my bills, of course). i suppose i could have done a little bit here and there, but after making so many positive strides a few months ago only to come to such an abrupt stop, i've been a bit disgusted. i'm at a point where i need parts and, sadly, all the positive thoughts, ability and encouragement in the world can't substitute for money.
thanks for checking in though. how have things been with you?
#55
i have done a few PP ad used sleeves with devcon to seal the gaps...use a little water on your finger to smooth it out and spread it...then when it cures you can sand it clean..
looks good so far dude good luck with your job hunting...........
are you going to weld tubes on manifold? or use devcon to make new passage? any pics on manifold mods?
biggest problem with epoxy is expasion rate vs aluminum..it is much closer to steel wich as you know aluminum expands 2 as much as steel..........i never really had any problems with devcon aluminm epoxy though ...that seems to be close to aluminum expansion rates..however i have seen devcon move away after about a year of serious racing....lol
henry
looks good so far dude good luck with your job hunting...........
are you going to weld tubes on manifold? or use devcon to make new passage? any pics on manifold mods?
biggest problem with epoxy is expasion rate vs aluminum..it is much closer to steel wich as you know aluminum expands 2 as much as steel..........i never really had any problems with devcon aluminm epoxy though ...that seems to be close to aluminum expansion rates..however i have seen devcon move away after about a year of serious racing....lol
henry
#56
Before the hole gets bored through the housing. fill the entire area with aluminum devcon. then have the PP or semi-pp bore strait through the housing and devcon. do not add a sleeve at all. so the devcon would actually be the sleeve.
is that what you have done?
#58
well, not to speak out of turn here, but it sounds like he did it like i (and every other semi-pp that i'm aware of) have done it. however, what i'd like to point out is that he also mentioned the Devcon started to "move" after a year. i don't know if this is "normal" or even common, but it does show it's possible. you never know if running without a sleeve can lead to a mishap, at least, that's my thought.
#59
thats true. but he said "serious racing". so im not sure of how many runs he means down the track. but for the most part. i dont plan on leaving a motor unopened for more than 30-40 runs. so it wouldnt be much of a problem to knock out the epoxy (if it came loose or migrated some) and refill then rebore. the housings would already have the holes and you could probly just use a drill press at home. or if you have steady hands a hand held drill to get through the epoxy.
im not speaking from experience though. just ideas.
im not speaking from experience though. just ideas.
#60
I only had this shrinkage occur once..it may have been a off batch of devcon though...I have seen racing beats clear stuff they use shrink some too....so its not unusual...We run about 15-20 races a year and in very hot climate too...caribbean .....engine temps usually run at 180 so it shouldnt real be a variable ....
as for the actuall no sleeve just epoxy....I dont think it will be a huge deal if your going to pull and monitor regularly, but i wont personnally risk a peice breaking and sucking into apex seals....why dont you make aluminium peices that fit the wter jacket area perfectly go all the way to the port area and weld it in place, then clean it with porting tool? I juts thought of that and it sounds like it might work..lol....eliminates the devcon doesnt it?
my 2 cents...
henry
as for the actuall no sleeve just epoxy....I dont think it will be a huge deal if your going to pull and monitor regularly, but i wont personnally risk a peice breaking and sucking into apex seals....why dont you make aluminium peices that fit the wter jacket area perfectly go all the way to the port area and weld it in place, then clean it with porting tool? I juts thought of that and it sounds like it might work..lol....eliminates the devcon doesnt it?
my 2 cents...
henry
#62
Scott Howard
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
Have there been other threads on the semi-Periph? It would be interesting to see results of the semi-P combined with different configurations of side porting. I've got a Bridgeport (non-J), was looking at adding a semi PP to my motor this winter.
#63
Scott Howard
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
never mind, I found them. It would be nice to get full PP hp, but with a slightly broader power band, say 7.5k - 10,000rpm, with peak hp around 320-340whp.
#64
![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
anyway, even though your next post said you found some stuff to read, this post reminded me of something that i had wanted to do since starting this thread. i wanted to include links to some of the related threads on the board. so here goes:
Semi peripheral porting by nkeehn
Semi PP + BP + Turbo by RotaryBoyz
Semi P-Port by DriftingRex
Semi P-Port questions by Pic
What can I gain going Semi P-Port? by BUSTN
New type of port: the Bridgial by wupwup
Semi P-Port by nick812
Semi PP + Rotor Beveling by Marcel Burkett
Peripheral port and Semi PP Concepts and Questions by Snrub
Help me get my Semi PP Turbo to start by z8cw
Semi PP Cosmo Block tuning help by wickedrx2
Semi PP or Bridge port by SavannaRx7
My Rx-7 is done with cup holders! And a 3-rotor Semi-PP setup, stock subframe by GtoRx7
hope these can be of some use to others. when i have time i'll try to find some from other sources i may (or may not) have read and gathered information.
#65
Scott Howard
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
so have you made a decision on whether or not you'll give it a try? ![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
anyway, even though your next post said you found some stuff to read, this post reminded me of something that i had wanted to do since starting this thread. i wanted to include links to some of the related threads on the board. so here goes:
Semi peripheral porting by nkeehn
Semi PP + BP + Turbo by RotaryBoyz
Semi P-Port by DriftingRex
Semi P-Port questions by Pic
What can I gain going Semi P-Port? by BUSTN
New type of port: the Bridgial by wupwup
Semi P-Port by nick812
Semi PP + Rotor Beveling by Marcel Burkett
Peripheral port and Semi PP Concepts and Questions by Snrub
Help me get my Semi PP Turbo to start by z8cw
Semi PP Cosmo Block tuning help by wickedrx2
Semi PP or Bridge port by SavannaRx7
My Rx-7 is done with cup holders! And a 3-rotor Semi-PP setup, stock subframe by GtoRx7
hope these can be of some use to others. when i have time i'll try to find some from other sources i may (or may not) have read and gathered information.
![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
anyway, even though your next post said you found some stuff to read, this post reminded me of something that i had wanted to do since starting this thread. i wanted to include links to some of the related threads on the board. so here goes:
Semi peripheral porting by nkeehn
Semi PP + BP + Turbo by RotaryBoyz
Semi P-Port by DriftingRex
Semi P-Port questions by Pic
What can I gain going Semi P-Port? by BUSTN
New type of port: the Bridgial by wupwup
Semi P-Port by nick812
Semi PP + Rotor Beveling by Marcel Burkett
Peripheral port and Semi PP Concepts and Questions by Snrub
Help me get my Semi PP Turbo to start by z8cw
Semi PP Cosmo Block tuning help by wickedrx2
Semi PP or Bridge port by SavannaRx7
My Rx-7 is done with cup holders! And a 3-rotor Semi-PP setup, stock subframe by GtoRx7
hope these can be of some use to others. when i have time i'll try to find some from other sources i may (or may not) have read and gathered information.
No final decisions yet. I'm trying to come up with a couple options, then go from there. I'm restricted to around 232whp (dynojet) in the race class that I'm currently running. I've been thinking about running the next class up, but there is a fairly big difference in power to weight ratio allowed between classes. With my current weight, I would have to run around 335-337whp to maximize the class with my car. I think I can do this with a proper full PP, or J-bridge and semi PP combo. I just had a sweet sheet metal intake manifold made for my bridge, but haven't put it on yet. If I run the semi PP, we can run 2 additional runners from the ports to the plenum. I would have to pull the motor apart in the off season (this winter) and change the porting from a normal bridge to a J bridge.
My current motor with a stock 3rd gen intake manifold has made up to 242whp at 24* timing and 91 octane with AFR's in the high 13's. I have it slightly detuned at 22* timing and AFR's in the low to mid 13's to meet my class.
#66
Scott Howard
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
I'm open to suggestions. I'm not sure how much power people have made with the semi PP. I know how much power we can get from a J bridge, so a semi PP added to it should do the trick. Would it have a slightly broader power range than a straight PP?
#67
all the big HP numbers seem to been unknown either because people arnt telling, or they dont know. I know the all motor guys around here like to tune at the track and the cars never touch a dyno. wich is the best way. but i have heard close to 400 whp all motor has been done. no proof though...
also, i been looking into this new epoxy for semi-pp hen filling the coolant passages. but it has a heat rating of 2400* F!!! JB weld and Devcon only have a range of 500-600* F. so im thinking it can be used in the exhaust area with (exhaust temps only reaching 1600-1700* normally). By removing the sleeves and using the epoxy to form a much better flowing exhaust. what do you guys think?
http://automotive-oilsandfluids.blog...high-temp.html
and also this one at the bottom of the page:
http://www.cotronics.com/vo/cotr/rm_putties.htm
also, i been looking into this new epoxy for semi-pp hen filling the coolant passages. but it has a heat rating of 2400* F!!! JB weld and Devcon only have a range of 500-600* F. so im thinking it can be used in the exhaust area with (exhaust temps only reaching 1600-1700* normally). By removing the sleeves and using the epoxy to form a much better flowing exhaust. what do you guys think?
http://automotive-oilsandfluids.blog...high-temp.html
and also this one at the bottom of the page:
http://www.cotronics.com/vo/cotr/rm_putties.htm
#68
GSLSE-YA, until more knowledgable/experienced players chime in, i'll start answering your question like this:
1. as far as numbers are concerned, 310 is the highest that i am aware of. i've tried to get my hands on other confirmed numbers, but so far nothing. that was Judge Ito that shared his results (if i recall it was without the bottle). i would consider his results to be above what the average person could expect, given his experience and body of knowledge alone. i also suspect that there may be people that know how to get just that much more, but until i see/hear it, that's just my gut speaking - not worth **** to me or you, i'm sure.
2. as far as powerband is concerned, though i don't recall seeing his graph, i suspect his would be a tad on the narrow side because he's drag racing. however, i would bet that you could tweak it for a wider powerband by getting fancy with port timing, port size and intake manifold designs.
i take it you won't be running turbo due to rules, so this graph will mean squat for your application, but it's soooo frickin' cool.![Big Grin](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
13B-RX3's results
1. as far as numbers are concerned, 310 is the highest that i am aware of. i've tried to get my hands on other confirmed numbers, but so far nothing. that was Judge Ito that shared his results (if i recall it was without the bottle). i would consider his results to be above what the average person could expect, given his experience and body of knowledge alone. i also suspect that there may be people that know how to get just that much more, but until i see/hear it, that's just my gut speaking - not worth **** to me or you, i'm sure.
2. as far as powerband is concerned, though i don't recall seeing his graph, i suspect his would be a tad on the narrow side because he's drag racing. however, i would bet that you could tweak it for a wider powerband by getting fancy with port timing, port size and intake manifold designs.
i take it you won't be running turbo due to rules, so this graph will mean squat for your application, but it's soooo frickin' cool.
![Big Grin](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
13B-RX3's results
#69
It's all in the timing.
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
also, i been looking into this new epoxy for semi-pp hen filling the coolant passages. but it has a heat rating of 2400* F!!! JB weld and Devcon only have a range of 500-600* F. so im thinking it can be used in the exhaust area with (exhaust temps only reaching 1600-1700* normally). By removing the sleeves and using the epoxy to form a much better flowing exhaust. what do you guys think?
http://automotive-oilsandfluids.blog...high-temp.html
and also this one at the bottom of the page:
http://www.cotronics.com/vo/cotr/rm_putties.htm
http://automotive-oilsandfluids.blog...high-temp.html
and also this one at the bottom of the page:
http://www.cotronics.com/vo/cotr/rm_putties.htm
![Dunno](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#71
Scott Howard
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
GSLSE-YA, until more knowledgable/experienced players chime in, i'll start answering your question like this:
1. as far as numbers are concerned, 310 is the highest that i am aware of. i've tried to get my hands on other confirmed numbers, but so far nothing. that was Judge Ito that shared his results (if i recall it was without the bottle). i would consider his results to be above what the average person could expect, given his experience and body of knowledge alone. i also suspect that there may be people that know how to get just that much more, but until i see/hear it, that's just my gut speaking - not worth **** to me or you, i'm sure.
2. as far as powerband is concerned, though i don't recall seeing his graph, i suspect his would be a tad on the narrow side because he's drag racing. however, i would bet that you could tweak it for a wider powerband by getting fancy with port timing, port size and intake manifold designs.
i take it you won't be running turbo due to rules, so this graph will mean squat for your application, but it's soooo frickin' cool.![Big Grin](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
13B-RX3's results
1. as far as numbers are concerned, 310 is the highest that i am aware of. i've tried to get my hands on other confirmed numbers, but so far nothing. that was Judge Ito that shared his results (if i recall it was without the bottle). i would consider his results to be above what the average person could expect, given his experience and body of knowledge alone. i also suspect that there may be people that know how to get just that much more, but until i see/hear it, that's just my gut speaking - not worth **** to me or you, i'm sure.
2. as far as powerband is concerned, though i don't recall seeing his graph, i suspect his would be a tad on the narrow side because he's drag racing. however, i would bet that you could tweak it for a wider powerband by getting fancy with port timing, port size and intake manifold designs.
i take it you won't be running turbo due to rules, so this graph will mean squat for your application, but it's soooo frickin' cool.
![Big Grin](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
13B-RX3's results
2" is too small, more like 2.5" - 2 3/4"
Obviously the bigger the port and higher the horsepower, the higher the rpm. I allready have the RB super light 89-91 rotors and an rx8 e shaft, balanced, ceramic apex seals, and all the good bearings, journals, etc. I also am currently running a mazda comp dry sump system. I might spring for the australian 2 piece e shaft when I make the jump. I need all the reliability that I can, I would like the motor to last through an entire season.
#72
Scott Howard
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
I'd also like to do it all with 91* octane with 2 cycle mix, like I'm currently running. Means I won't be running much timing. I think many of the guys that are getting 350-400whp are using race gas or other forms of race fuel, which means they can run a lot of timing.
If I make the switch this winter, maybe I will post dyno sheets.
I've never posted my current dyno sheet, I need to scan it in. I didn't want to post anything before NASA nationals. I ended up with electrical problems that put me out after the first day. It's all been worked out now.
If I make the switch this winter, maybe I will post dyno sheets.
I've never posted my current dyno sheet, I need to scan it in. I didn't want to post anything before NASA nationals. I ended up with electrical problems that put me out after the first day. It's all been worked out now.
#73
Moderator
![](/images/misc/20_year_icon.png)
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,979
Received 2,686 Likes
on
1,901 Posts
Thanks for the links!
No final decisions yet. I'm trying to come up with a couple options, then go from there. I'm restricted to around 232whp (dynojet) in the race class that I'm currently running. I've been thinking about running the next class up, but there is a fairly big difference in power to weight ratio allowed between classes. With my current weight, I would have to run around 335-337whp to maximize the class with my car. I think I can do this with a proper full PP, or J-bridge and semi PP combo. I just had a sweet sheet metal intake manifold made for my bridge, but haven't put it on yet. If I run the semi PP, we can run 2 additional runners from the ports to the plenum. I would have to pull the motor apart in the off season (this winter) and change the porting from a normal bridge to a J bridge.
My current motor with a stock 3rd gen intake manifold has made up to 242whp at 24* timing and 91 octane with AFR's in the high 13's. I have it slightly detuned at 22* timing and AFR's in the low to mid 13's to meet my class.
No final decisions yet. I'm trying to come up with a couple options, then go from there. I'm restricted to around 232whp (dynojet) in the race class that I'm currently running. I've been thinking about running the next class up, but there is a fairly big difference in power to weight ratio allowed between classes. With my current weight, I would have to run around 335-337whp to maximize the class with my car. I think I can do this with a proper full PP, or J-bridge and semi PP combo. I just had a sweet sheet metal intake manifold made for my bridge, but haven't put it on yet. If I run the semi PP, we can run 2 additional runners from the ports to the plenum. I would have to pull the motor apart in the off season (this winter) and change the porting from a normal bridge to a J bridge.
My current motor with a stock 3rd gen intake manifold has made up to 242whp at 24* timing and 91 octane with AFR's in the high 13's. I have it slightly detuned at 22* timing and AFR's in the low to mid 13's to meet my class.
next class up, might be full PP or 3 rotor or something
these are good problems! if we put the honda in PT, we're overweight and underpowered...