Haltech A guy I know who road-races his car said...
#1
Thread Starter
****** of disaster
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, CA
A guy I know who road-races his car said...
Also if you are serious about road racing a rotory don't use the Haltech. opt for a Motec. Yes the cost more but I will vouch for the difference in the way the car runs. I have absolutly no hesitation, stumbles, or lean spots. My car was dyno'd in November it made 405 with a Microtech. That ECU took a crap at the track after my alternator died. I went Motec M2R and I gained 50 hp with changing the TPS, coils, and ECU only. Same dyno same tuner and same boost settings. The car runs awesome. It runs as smooth as a new car. We overlayed the two dyno runs and they were night and day. The Haltechs and Microtechs don't seem to be able to keep up with the needs of a turbo road race rotory motor. They are fine when you are either at idle or full throttle (Drag Racing), but it is my opinion that with a modulating throttle with varying load conditions there are rich and lean conditions that can't be ironed out within the tune. We tuned every 250 RPM from idle to 8500 rpm. Motec is simply the best option for our cars it cost twice of what a Haltech does but what does a rebuild cost these days? Good luck with your build
#3
He probably never worked with an E11v2 or even an E8 before and is going by old E6K standards, which were good for its day but nothing compared to the resolution of the E8/E11v2.
I have talked to people who have gone from a 689hp 3 rotor with Microtech and have told me that the difference is night and day making the same power (perhaps more). The simple fact is that a microtech is a very simple system, its got far less resolution than even an old E6K/S and thats why that difference is felt when upgraded to what ever system with more resolution.
The fact is that a Haltech E8/E11 can do just about everything the Motec M400 and M600 can and just so happen to cost half as much.
I can guarantee you that guy has not taken the time to sit down and do the same thing he has done on his 3 rotor with an E11v2 so he can see the difference (or capabilities).
With a Haltech you can properly control your idle, midrange, high end, split, corrections, have auxiliary accessories, etc. etc. etc., and it will do it all very very well.
You said so yourself, you are not suffering from any of the so called "problems" he talks about, and i am willing to bet that your car can be tuned to what ever potential he can think of that is within tolerances of your motor. He's probably very passionate about Motecs, i know they are a great system and they do the job well, but Haltech is also a great system and the E8/E11, and now the Platinum, are top notch.
I have talked to people who have gone from a 689hp 3 rotor with Microtech and have told me that the difference is night and day making the same power (perhaps more). The simple fact is that a microtech is a very simple system, its got far less resolution than even an old E6K/S and thats why that difference is felt when upgraded to what ever system with more resolution.
The fact is that a Haltech E8/E11 can do just about everything the Motec M400 and M600 can and just so happen to cost half as much.
I can guarantee you that guy has not taken the time to sit down and do the same thing he has done on his 3 rotor with an E11v2 so he can see the difference (or capabilities).
With a Haltech you can properly control your idle, midrange, high end, split, corrections, have auxiliary accessories, etc. etc. etc., and it will do it all very very well.
You said so yourself, you are not suffering from any of the so called "problems" he talks about, and i am willing to bet that your car can be tuned to what ever potential he can think of that is within tolerances of your motor. He's probably very passionate about Motecs, i know they are a great system and they do the job well, but Haltech is also a great system and the E8/E11, and now the Platinum, are top notch.
#4
I don't see how one EMS can dramatically increase peak HP over another. Driveability, sure, I can see that, especially if one EMS has better resolution than the other.
Also, his is not a fair comparison. He's already introduced other variables than just the EMS into the equation. He's changed coils and TPS, so both power and driveability could increase from just that alone. We haven't even considered environmental factors, such as ambient temperature and humidity, between the dyno runs with the different EMS.
Also, his is not a fair comparison. He's already introduced other variables than just the EMS into the equation. He's changed coils and TPS, so both power and driveability could increase from just that alone. We haven't even considered environmental factors, such as ambient temperature and humidity, between the dyno runs with the different EMS.
#5
Yes, this sort of discussion is like a "chicken and the egg" thing.
Its all very very relative, too many things come into play.
But, the important thing is that for example, an EMS with 16x16 resulution and a 16bit processor will not give the same results as an EMS with 32x32 resolution with a 32bit processor.
And finally the MOST important factor of all, the guy behind the keyboard, its very likely that if the person behind the laptop knows the EMS back to front, upside down and backwards, he will be able to do a good job on the tuning, regardless of the system, but a better system will give better results.
Its all very very relative, too many things come into play.
But, the important thing is that for example, an EMS with 16x16 resulution and a 16bit processor will not give the same results as an EMS with 32x32 resolution with a 32bit processor.
And finally the MOST important factor of all, the guy behind the keyboard, its very likely that if the person behind the laptop knows the EMS back to front, upside down and backwards, he will be able to do a good job on the tuning, regardless of the system, but a better system will give better results.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thecody59
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
14
01-23-16 11:52 AM