Chip it or stand alone engine management?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Detroit
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chip it or stand alone engine management?
I'm plannin on makin a street sleeper out of an Omni GLH or a Ford Festiva and a Mazda 4cyl turbo motor. I don't like the idea of runnin high boost conditions on either vehicle without some kind of serious engine management. You can get chips for the Mazda ECU but I don't think the Omni has that large an aftermarket. Should I go with an Electromotive TECII or a bleed off screw from the hardware store between the wastegate and the vaccum signal? Decisions, decisions, decisions.
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Detroit
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Lx Five Ohh
hmmm...Do u mean that ur gonna use a Omni GLH or a Ford Festiva with a Mazda 4 cyl turbo?! Or ?
hmmm...Do u mean that ur gonna use a Omni GLH or a Ford Festiva with a Mazda 4 cyl turbo?! Or ?
#4
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
Well, to run high boost, you would need both a chip AND a fuel controller. For this kind of money you may as well just get an EMS which will also give you boost control, ignition control, data logging, and an AFR readout. My own opinion is that the stock EMS is a slow and outdated, and the stock AFM is an unnecessary performance-robbing restriction, so it would be in your best interest to eliminate both for a true performance vehicle. Also, I doubt that a simple chip would run your particular application correctly, anyway.
I don't know of anybody who had an easy time tuning a TECII. If you like the Electromotive EMS systems, then you may want to wait a month or two when the TECIII is offered on the public market. It is supposed to be much easier to tune than the TECII.
http://www.electromotive-inc.com/tec3.htm
I don't know of anybody who had an easy time tuning a TECII. If you like the Electromotive EMS systems, then you may want to wait a month or two when the TECIII is offered on the public market. It is supposed to be much easier to tune than the TECII.
http://www.electromotive-inc.com/tec3.htm
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Detroit
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
Well, to run high boost, you would need both a chip AND a fuel controller. For this kind of money you may as well just get an EMS which will also give you boost control, ignition control, data logging, and an AFR readout. My own opinion is that the stock EMS is a slow and outdated, and the stock AFM is an unnecessary performance-robbing restriction, so it would be in your best interest to eliminate both for a true performance vehicle. Also, I doubt that a simple chip would run your particular application correctly, anyway.
I don't know of anybody who had an easy time tuning a TECII. If you like the Electromotive EMS systems, then you may want to wait a month or two when the TECIII is offered on the public market. It is supposed to be much easier to tune than the TECII.
http://www.electromotive-inc.com/tec3.htm
Well, to run high boost, you would need both a chip AND a fuel controller. For this kind of money you may as well just get an EMS which will also give you boost control, ignition control, data logging, and an AFR readout. My own opinion is that the stock EMS is a slow and outdated, and the stock AFM is an unnecessary performance-robbing restriction, so it would be in your best interest to eliminate both for a true performance vehicle. Also, I doubt that a simple chip would run your particular application correctly, anyway.
I don't know of anybody who had an easy time tuning a TECII. If you like the Electromotive EMS systems, then you may want to wait a month or two when the TECIII is offered on the public market. It is supposed to be much easier to tune than the TECII.
http://www.electromotive-inc.com/tec3.htm
#6
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
Originally posted by Mr. Wankel
Well, I've read other threads in the ECU forum and the TECII and III appear to run in the 2000 to 2500 dollar territory. That's way over my budget considering the car I'll be buying will cost around an even grand. If there was a programmable system for a grand or less I'd consider it but anything over is just insane if you ask me. That bleed off screw is beginning to sound pretty nice.
Well, I've read other threads in the ECU forum and the TECII and III appear to run in the 2000 to 2500 dollar territory. That's way over my budget considering the car I'll be buying will cost around an even grand. If there was a programmable system for a grand or less I'd consider it but anything over is just insane if you ask me. That bleed off screw is beginning to sound pretty nice.
The TEC EMS units are a better value if you also need a good ignition system. You can get a Haltech E6K for a little over $1,200, and the Wolf3D 4.0 with 3d boost control will be available soon at similar pricing. I think that this is about as cheap as it gets for a quality EMS.
Here's a link for a chip. I guess it's rather ironic that I think that THIS price is insane for what little you get, but I guess it's all in your perspective.
http://www.reichracing.com/project323/page2.htm
BTW, I love bleed-off screws. Were it not for bleed-off screws, there wouldn't be such a large, inexpensive supply of parts cars with blown turbo engines.
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Yorkton, SK, Canada
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I expect you read the SCC article about Cam's festiva with the mazda 4cyl turbo. It's a nice car - www.cwstuning.com
I would personally go with the omni glh. Way easier and cheaper to make much faster, bigger aftermarket, more used parts, faster, more of a sleeper in my opinion.
I would personally go with the omni glh. Way easier and cheaper to make much faster, bigger aftermarket, more used parts, faster, more of a sleeper in my opinion.
Trending Topics
#8
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Detroit
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
LOL, welcome to reality!
The TEC EMS units are a better value if you also need a good ignition system. You can get a Haltech E6K for a little over $1,200, and the Wolf3D 4.0 with 3d boost control will be available soon at similar pricing. I think that this is about as cheap as it gets for a quality EMS.
Here's a link for a chip. I guess it's rather ironic that I think that THIS price is insane for what little you get, but I guess it's all in your perspective.
http://www.reichracing.com/project323/page2.htm
BTW, I love bleed-off screws. Were it not for bleed-off screws, there wouldn't be such a large, inexpensive supply of parts cars with blown turbo engines.
LOL, welcome to reality!
The TEC EMS units are a better value if you also need a good ignition system. You can get a Haltech E6K for a little over $1,200, and the Wolf3D 4.0 with 3d boost control will be available soon at similar pricing. I think that this is about as cheap as it gets for a quality EMS.
Here's a link for a chip. I guess it's rather ironic that I think that THIS price is insane for what little you get, but I guess it's all in your perspective.
http://www.reichracing.com/project323/page2.htm
BTW, I love bleed-off screws. Were it not for bleed-off screws, there wouldn't be such a large, inexpensive supply of parts cars with blown turbo engines.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
82streetracer
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
08-23-15 09:28 AM