3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Whats expected out of this basic setup?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-09, 02:09 PM
  #1  
ROTARY PUNX

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jonnyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 938
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CA Whats expected out of this basic setup?

Stock Sequential Twins
Stock Ports
Pettit Unlimited ECU
Apexi Twin Intake
SMIC
HKS downpipe
High flow cat
catback
Walboro fuel pump (stock injectors)

and what about the same setup with a small/mild street port.

I figured I'd stay at stock boost level or max maybe 12-13psi.
Thanks guys
Old 02-20-09, 02:59 PM
  #2  
Finally Knows

iTrader: (21)
 
WaachBack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
300 rwhp

325rwhp
Old 02-20-09, 04:46 PM
  #3  
ROTARY PUNX

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jonnyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 938
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
really? looking on the forums people were hitting 300rwhp with the stock intercooler and stock fuel...not even a fuel pump
Old 02-20-09, 05:03 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (3)
 
rx-7na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You wont know until you take it to a dyno. Not every car is the same but I'd say right around 300 to 330 whp if running correctly.
Old 02-20-09, 07:37 PM
  #5  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
moconnor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,663
Received 84 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by jonnyrx7
really? looking on the forums people were hitting 300rwhp with the stock intercooler and stock fuel...not even a fuel pump

A fuel pump is not going to change the amount of horsepower you see.

A dyno run costs about $100. You could be anywhere from 260-340whp.
Old 02-20-09, 07:42 PM
  #6  
Brappable not Unflappable
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
RLaoFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,385
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
My guess with that setup is on the lower end of what moconnor suggested. 260-290
Old 02-20-09, 08:05 PM
  #7  
ROTARY PUNX

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jonnyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 938
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What other significant options are there...electronic boost controller, non-seq twins with a ported wastegate...and a catless midpipe? I'm going for some good hp on the stock twins before jumping into the single turbo game.
Old 02-20-09, 08:09 PM
  #8  
Brappable not Unflappable
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
RLaoFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,385
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Honestly the best thing you can do for the car is get a PowerFC.

If you want you can also looking into aux. injection.

Both those things will maximize your HP if you don't want to leave the twin setup.
Old 02-20-09, 08:21 PM
  #9  
ROTARY PUNX

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jonnyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 938
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really didn't want to go for the PFC. If I were to get a stand alone it was going to be the AEM (cause I'd get the tune for free). So if its not the Pettit ECU current then its going to be E-Manage Ultimate with a Plug n Play harness.

I figured with the mod list & an electronic boost controller I'd be in the 300-340whp range. Id maybe switch the SMIC for a FMIC.
Old 02-20-09, 08:26 PM
  #10  
Brappable not Unflappable
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
RLaoFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,385
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I want to be optimistic and and say that the range you think its going to get is about right, but its unlikely. Getting a standalone right now will save you time and effort because you're going to realize that the capabilities of a tunable computer will help you in the long run.

and please, please don't use the e-manage.
Old 02-21-09, 05:22 AM
  #11  
ONLY FD OWNER IN MY STATE

iTrader: (1)
 
mr.veilsidewankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NORWAY
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
uuhm, why do you allways write rwhp? no way in hell are you going to make 325 on that setup
flywheel hp yes, not rwhp
and how do you people masure hp?
the lokal rx club went to have our rexes tuned in UK last spring, the best twin setup gpt 330 at mthe wheels, over 1bar bost(16+psi) all boltons, porting, ignition fuel, ic, ewerything
it was the highest number ever dynoed on stock twins(even nonseq converted)
so how the hell do you all the suddenly get shitloads more?
Old 02-21-09, 05:57 AM
  #12  
Brappable not Unflappable
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
RLaoFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,385
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by mr.veilsidewankel
uuhm, why do you allways write rwhp? no way in hell are you going to make 325 on that setup
flywheel hp yes, not rwhp
and how do you people masure hp?
the lokal rx club went to have our rexes tuned in UK last spring, the best twin setup gpt 330 at mthe wheels, over 1bar bost(16+psi) all boltons, porting, ignition fuel, ic, ewerything
it was the highest number ever dynoed on stock twins(even nonseq converted)
so how the hell do you all the suddenly get shitloads more?
Good sir,

no need to be drastic. first off the dynos in the UK are calibrated to measure lower hp numbers than here in the US.

second, i do agree with you that he is not going to make his expected power.
Old 02-21-09, 06:04 AM
  #13  
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,933
Received 315 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by mr.veilsidewankel
uuhm, why do you allways write rwhp? no way in hell are you going to make 325 on that setup
flywheel hp yes, not rwhp
and how do you people masure hp?
the lokal rx club went to have our rexes tuned in UK last spring, the best twin setup gpt 330 at mthe wheels, over 1bar bost(16+psi) all boltons, porting, ignition fuel, ic, ewerything
it was the highest number ever dynoed on stock twins(even nonseq converted)
so how the hell do you all the suddenly get shitloads more?

The majority of American power figures are recorded on Dynojet or Dynopack brand dynometers. UK and European readings tend to come from Dyno-Dynamics brand dynometers.

I was distraught and confused by this comparison in power about a year ago, so I dug into the differences. Basically the Dyno-Dynamics dyno will return numbers between %15 and %18 lower than your average Dynojet or Dynopack. THAT is the reason it always seems like cars in the states make SOOO much more power with less boost and fewer mods.

FWIW I'm running all the bolt-ons, ancillaries and a MASSIVE VMIC pushing 1.2-1.3bar through a set of BNRs. I made 340hp at the wheels, if (when) I put my car on an American dyno I expect to have much closer to (if not more than) 400 at the wheels with the exact same setup and tune. Rest easy mr.veilsidewankel, your friends 7 isn't a dud

Last edited by fendamonky; 02-21-09 at 06:07 AM.
Old 02-21-09, 07:22 AM
  #14  
ONLY FD OWNER IN MY STATE

iTrader: (1)
 
mr.veilsidewankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NORWAY
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fendamonky
The majority of American power figures are recorded on Dynojet or Dynopack brand dynometers. UK and European readings tend to come from Dyno-Dynamics brand dynometers.

I was distraught and confused by this comparison in power about a year ago, so I dug into the differences. Basically the Dyno-Dynamics dyno will return numbers between %15 and %18 lower than your average Dynojet or Dynopack. THAT is the reason it always seems like cars in the states make SOOO much more power with less boost and fewer mods.

FWIW I'm running all the bolt-ons, ancillaries and a MASSIVE VMIC pushing 1.2-1.3bar through a set of BNRs. I made 340hp at the wheels, if (when) I put my car on an American dyno I expect to have much closer to (if not more than) 400 at the wheels with the exact same setup and tune. Rest easy mr.veilsidewankel, your friends 7 isn't a dud
hehe, thats what i thought, i made 335 at the wheels with my single last year,i was alittle dissapionted but since you us guys "cheat" on your dynos i do feel alittle better, gues i have about 400 at the wheels then
why do the different machines give so odd numbers, isnt there a standard as to what 1horsepower is? what does the motor industry use?
Old 02-21-09, 04:15 PM
  #15  
ROTARY PUNX

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jonnyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 938
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
more and more now I'm just leaning to the T04S single kit
Old 02-21-09, 05:18 PM
  #16  
Finally Knows

iTrader: (21)
 
WaachBack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd go T04R or better yet, T04Z.
Old 02-21-09, 05:34 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
boooost94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not bad
Old 02-21-09, 06:06 PM
  #18  
ROTARY PUNX

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jonnyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 938
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WaachBack
I'd go T04R or better yet, T04Z.
sacrificing spool for top end? How do you like your setup non-sequential. what did you put down?
Old 02-21-09, 08:28 PM
  #19  
ROTARY PUNX

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jonnyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 938
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RLaoFD
I want to be optimistic and and say that the range you think its going to get is about right, but its unlikely. Getting a standalone right now will save you time and effort because you're going to realize that the capabilities of a tunable computer will help you in the long run.

and please, please don't use the e-manage.
Really I was going for E-manage Ultimate. Has plenty of features

Self tuning, 2 step launch control, Gives control of Ignition (leading and trailing) and Injectors (primary and secondary), Airflow Meter elimination, etc just to name a few.

Greddys site:
"2 independent setting can now be stored and accessed via the “Toggle Switch.” 2 separate maps for the “Injection Adjustment Map” and the “Ignition Map.” (For Rotary engines, 2 separate “Primary and Secondary Injector Maps” and “Leading & Trailing Ignition Maps.”) i.e. one program for “street” and one for “race track”. "

boomslang makes a plug n play harness for the FD.
Old 02-21-09, 08:39 PM
  #20  
rotorhead
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,187
Received 435 Likes on 267 Posts
what is the point of an E-manage ultimate on an FD. it has no control over injector staging
Old 02-21-09, 10:39 PM
  #21  
Roxann7
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
GreatShamanGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,421
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
You're going to need more fuel if you want to get any high HP. What HP were you looking for 400?
Old 02-22-09, 12:02 AM
  #22  
Full Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fd3stouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i got 330 rwhp on 15 psi with sequential twins with the following performance upgrades:

fmic, fuel pump, 4 inch turbo back exhaust, unorthodox pulley, turbo pippings, street ported, Power FC.

Tunning is the most essential I tell you that much.
Old 02-22-09, 03:06 PM
  #23  
ROTARY PUNX

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
jonnyrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 938
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah it really looks like. Im going to just go single. Too much of a hassle dealing with the stock twins... also with room for things to go wrong.
Old 02-22-09, 04:50 PM
  #24  
Defined Autoworks

iTrader: (6)
 
FDWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hit 334 at the wheels with, stock non-seq twins, stock ports, v-mount, electramotive techGT, walboro 255, and 14-15psi. I also made the power on a 40k reman engine. With the right tune good power can be made. I also had my tune done on a dynapack dyno.
Old 02-22-09, 05:58 PM
  #25  
Finally Knows

iTrader: (21)
 
WaachBack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jonnyrx7
sacrificing spool for top end? How do you like your setup non-sequential. what did you put down?

Yeah, I like the non-seq alot better then seq. It's mostly due to being a much more reliable and simple system to work with though.

I just put a new motor in my car 1 week ago so Im not boosting yet, but even when I do, I can't tell what my RWHP is cause there are no dynos on my island! Bleh. I guess I could look at track MPH's for an indication...


Quick Reply: Whats expected out of this basic setup?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.