Starting off the new year with an engine pull!
#153
Tight tolerances on a new engine. That exhaust leak isn't helping. For a conservative tune at 13psi I think you're making good power with that turbo. What type of dyno were you on?
#154
Rich, I got 2 OEM turbo manifold gaskets.
I was running on a conservative tune for 15psi. Steve said that he retarded the timing just a little, but he said it'd only be a 5-10rwhp difference at most. We will see, he comes back in March and I'm getting another tune, this time with my water injection going and possibly 17psi. If I start reaching the 400+rwhp mark at 15psi, then I'm going to keep it at that.
I was running on a conservative tune for 15psi. Steve said that he retarded the timing just a little, but he said it'd only be a 5-10rwhp difference at most. We will see, he comes back in March and I'm getting another tune, this time with my water injection going and possibly 17psi. If I start reaching the 400+rwhp mark at 15psi, then I'm going to keep it at that.
#155
So I finally got the chance to replace my turbo exhaust manifold gaskets.
Here are the gaskets that were on there...I have no idea if these were just pre-made or what the heck type of gaskets these are...
Here is what I replaced them with, OEM Mazda gaskets. Hopefully it solves any type of leaks...
Here are the gaskets that were on there...I have no idea if these were just pre-made or what the heck type of gaskets these are...
Here is what I replaced them with, OEM Mazda gaskets. Hopefully it solves any type of leaks...
#157
Yea, I am hoping this fixes my "power loss" problem.
I went to get a tune with my setup and I was only pushing 345rwhp at 15-16psi. Most setups would be pushing close to 450rwhp. Don't know if it could make up 100rwhp but we will see if there is any benefit to switching out the gaskets.
I went to get a tune with my setup and I was only pushing 345rwhp at 15-16psi. Most setups would be pushing close to 450rwhp. Don't know if it could make up 100rwhp but we will see if there is any benefit to switching out the gaskets.
#158
Yea, I am hoping this fixes my "power loss" problem.
I went to get a tune with my setup and I was only pushing 345rwhp at 15-16psi. Most setups would be pushing close to 450rwhp. Don't know if it could make up 100rwhp but we will see if there is any benefit to switching out the gaskets.
I went to get a tune with my setup and I was only pushing 345rwhp at 15-16psi. Most setups would be pushing close to 450rwhp. Don't know if it could make up 100rwhp but we will see if there is any benefit to switching out the gaskets.
#159
Car was dyno'd on a typical dynojet by Steve Kan. It was on a brand new engine still so maybe the seals just hadn't set in? I had around 900+ miles on the new motor and then when he came in, he tuned it and it was the first time the car going into boost and WOT. He tuned the car conservative because my water injection wasn't working, but he said it would only be around another 5-10rwhp so there had to be something else. Boost was holding 15-16psi, spark was fine, brand new spark plugs and ignition was fine, so maybe I'm lucky and it was a simple fix of these gaskets.
Steve is coming back in March and he is going to tune the car with my water injection. I've put a couple more hundred miles on the car since the last tune. Going to have a tune for around 16-17psi. I think that will be good enough for now.
Steve is coming back in March and he is going to tune the car with my water injection. I've put a couple more hundred miles on the car since the last tune. Going to have a tune for around 16-17psi. I think that will be good enough for now.
#164
Manifold flanges...
Those one gaskets look a little odd? I like the OEM MAZDA ones which I see you have now. I'm wondering how those others even got there, but those may be normal on some I dont know. I've never seen em though.
Since Goodfellas, not to mention Howard are giving advice, I guess this is where I get off. Your in good hands.
Since Goodfellas, not to mention Howard are giving advice, I guess this is where I get off. Your in good hands.
#166
Howard, care to let me know how/what you see to know that my manifold is warped?
#167
Racing Rotary Since 1983
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,136
Likes: 564
From: Florence, Alabama
picture 2 shows a great deal of carbon coming from both exhaust ports. there should be no carbon on the gasket. either your manifold is warped or the top two nuts were not torqued to spec.
there is a significant amount of heat into the stainless steel flange during the welding process and stainless steel warps more than most materials. generally, the flange needs to be reground flat after the build process.
i found my manifold was leaking on it's maiden dyno run and had it ground. no leaks now.
as above, it could be your manifold is flat and the nuts weren't properly tightend. if this was the case the manifold can (then) warp from being loose as it is then exposed to high temp exhaust gas where leaking.
so do take a good at it. it should be dead flat.. within a thousandth of an inch.
howard
there is a significant amount of heat into the stainless steel flange during the welding process and stainless steel warps more than most materials. generally, the flange needs to be reground flat after the build process.
i found my manifold was leaking on it's maiden dyno run and had it ground. no leaks now.
as above, it could be your manifold is flat and the nuts weren't properly tightend. if this was the case the manifold can (then) warp from being loose as it is then exposed to high temp exhaust gas where leaking.
so do take a good at it. it should be dead flat.. within a thousandth of an inch.
howard
#168
Is there a way to take a look at this by not having to take the manifold all the way off? For when I changed my gaskets I just removed my wastegate, disconnected my downpipe from the exhaust and removed some the oil feed/return line to be able to push it off the bolts to slide the new gaskets on. Would any gap be noticeable to the naked eye?
#169
Racing Rotary Since 1983
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,136
Likes: 564
From: Florence, Alabama
leaking exhaust manifolds deposit carbon on the engine. check the engine at the falnge area for carbon.
BTW, to be clear, i shouldn't have said your manifold is necessarily warped as it could be the nuts were not sufficiently torqued.
it is, however, one or the other or both
hc
BTW, to be clear, i shouldn't have said your manifold is necessarily warped as it could be the nuts were not sufficiently torqued.
it is, however, one or the other or both
hc
#171
Thought I'd go ahead and give an update on the car.
This past weekend, Steve Kan flew in again and tuned my car. I hadn't changed much with the car since the last tune. Maybe put on 300 miles on the motor, installed brand new OEM manifold gaskets and got my water injection working.
The final numbers ended up being 406rwhp/325rwtq @ 18psi. An increase of 62rwhp/56rwtq and 2psi.
I am pretty happy with the numbers, but in comparing my setup with Rich (we basically have the same exact setups) he is almost 90rwhp more than my setup.
I'm trying to figure out where the bottlenecks of my setup are in stealing power away.
Future things I need to improve:
1. Rewire my fuel pump. Steve said that I am at about 87% duty cycle
2. Order thicker coupers/better clamps/flare IC piping. During the pulls the coupler was blowing off because the IC piping had no flare to clamp to
3. Think about possibly running 50/50 water and meth setup for next tune.
Haven't been able to feel what the extra 60rwhp feels like as it was raining during the day of my tune and I was already breaking loose in 3rd gear just casually driving over to the tune.
I'm excited for some sun!
This is showing two results.
Blue is when Steve came in January to tune the car @ 16PSI
Red is the most recent tune @ 18psi with water injection
This past weekend, Steve Kan flew in again and tuned my car. I hadn't changed much with the car since the last tune. Maybe put on 300 miles on the motor, installed brand new OEM manifold gaskets and got my water injection working.
The final numbers ended up being 406rwhp/325rwtq @ 18psi. An increase of 62rwhp/56rwtq and 2psi.
I am pretty happy with the numbers, but in comparing my setup with Rich (we basically have the same exact setups) he is almost 90rwhp more than my setup.
I'm trying to figure out where the bottlenecks of my setup are in stealing power away.
Future things I need to improve:
1. Rewire my fuel pump. Steve said that I am at about 87% duty cycle
2. Order thicker coupers/better clamps/flare IC piping. During the pulls the coupler was blowing off because the IC piping had no flare to clamp to
3. Think about possibly running 50/50 water and meth setup for next tune.
Haven't been able to feel what the extra 60rwhp feels like as it was raining during the day of my tune and I was already breaking loose in 3rd gear just casually driving over to the tune.
I'm excited for some sun!
This is showing two results.
Blue is when Steve came in January to tune the car @ 16PSI
Red is the most recent tune @ 18psi with water injection
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 05:40 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
08-11-15 04:47 PM