3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Rwhp to flywheel difference ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-08 | 09:39 PM
  #1  
silverflash2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: FL
Rwhp to flywheel difference ?

What is the diff. between the two

On the dyno it says 616 hp and 458 torque

I'm gonna order a act clutch and i know they are rated by torque to the flywheel.

What would be my flywheel torque ?
Old 04-09-08 | 10:05 PM
  #2  
skir2222's Avatar
I win
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 2
From: NJ
530 tops is my guess at a 15% drivetrain loss rate.
Old 04-09-08 | 10:16 PM
  #3  
SENZA PARI's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!

 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 1
From: Menasha, WI
you are making 600hp with a supra pump?
Old 04-09-08 | 10:39 PM
  #4  
bryant's Avatar
bryant
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: montgomery
25% difference.

all depends on weight in the drive line.
so carbon fiber drive shaft would make it less, light weight flywheel would make it less, so on and so on.
Old 04-09-08 | 11:07 PM
  #5  
silverflash2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: FL
Originally Posted by jdmfantasy
you are making 600hp with a supra pump?
It's the dyno off kgparts for the R85, I probably won't have that much hp, but just using it as a base to figure out what I need for a clutch. I do plan on running 26 lbs of boost, and have twin supra pumps and methanol injection. Just finished my rebuilt motor and installing the rest of the supporting mods.

Thanks for the help, I'll go with a clutch that can hold 530 tq.
Old 04-09-08 | 11:13 PM
  #6  
pinkrx7's Avatar
fadedvr=pink

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento,CA
Originally Posted by bryant
25% difference.

all depends on weight in the drive line.
so carbon fiber drive shaft would make it less, light weight flywheel would make it less, so on and so on.
carbon driveline advantages are negligible.
Old 04-09-08 | 11:19 PM
  #7  
bryant's Avatar
bryant
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: montgomery
Originally Posted by pinkrx7
carbon driveline advantages are negligible.
ok, but i still think he gets the point..
Old 04-09-08 | 11:34 PM
  #8  
legendrx7's Avatar
Rotarded since 1992
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 348
Likes: 3
From: Little Rock, AR, USA
I think it's generally 15% manual and 20% for auto's
Old 04-09-08 | 11:42 PM
  #9  
pinkrx7's Avatar
fadedvr=pink

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento,CA
Originally Posted by legendrx7
I think it's generally 15% manual and 20% for auto's
thats correct
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 08:06 PM
Ian_D
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
10-14-15 01:31 PM
sinclair7seven
General Rotary Tech Support
11
09-11-15 11:15 AM
risingsunroof82
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
09-09-15 09:06 PM
Enzo1944
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
09-06-15 09:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM.