My 3rd gen dyno
#27
Weird Cat Man
Originally posted by twinturboteddy
Just so there is less confusion this is on a 3 rotor motor
Just so there is less confusion this is on a 3 rotor motor
Mental note: Post my friend's 780 rwhp dyno tomorrow...
Oh yeah that's on a Supra motor, but I won't say anything
#28
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The land of Lincoln
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Wargasm
Well maybe if the original poster had mentioned this very minor detail, I wouldn't have said his numbers were suspect.
Mental note: Post my friend's 780 rwhp dyno tomorrow...
Oh yeah that's on a Supra motor, but I won't say anything
Well maybe if the original poster had mentioned this very minor detail, I wouldn't have said his numbers were suspect.
Mental note: Post my friend's 780 rwhp dyno tomorrow...
Oh yeah that's on a Supra motor, but I won't say anything
#29
Weird Cat Man
Let's have some more details of the setup...
What tranny and diff are you using?
What tires are you running in the rear?
How is the engine mounted? (Pettit subframe? Custom job? What?)
How much do you figure the total setup cost ya?
Got any pics of the install?
What tranny and diff are you using?
What tires are you running in the rear?
How is the engine mounted? (Pettit subframe? Custom job? What?)
How much do you figure the total setup cost ya?
Got any pics of the install?
#31
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As the size of the engine goes up the pressure that it takes to make a certain cfm goes down. Since he increased his displacement 50% I'd imagine the pressure dropped 50%. The reason is the 50% larger engine takes 50% more cfm to make the same boost. On a 13B you'd prob have to run twice as much pressure to get the same cfm...which would prob be about right (28psi for 600+rwhp on a 13b)
BTW - Nice numbers man. What size injectors are you running and what engine management?
STEPHEN
BTW - Nice numbers man. What size injectors are you running and what engine management?
STEPHEN
#32
Weird Cat Man
Originally posted by Gargamel
nobody cares to see your friends dynosheet.
nobody cares to see your friends dynosheet.
#33
Weird Cat Man
Good numbers... I have a couple other 20B dynos here and you're doing really nicely:
http://www.catenet.net/graph.php?car...1&SUBMIT=GRAPH
http://www.catenet.net/graph.php?car...1&SUBMIT=GRAPH
#38
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Wargasm
Good numbers... I have a couple other 20B dynos here and you're doing really nicely:
http://www.catenet.net/graph.php?car...1&SUBMIT=GRAPH
Good numbers... I have a couple other 20B dynos here and you're doing really nicely:
http://www.catenet.net/graph.php?car...1&SUBMIT=GRAPH
Something must be wrong with that T72 graph in your link, they should be making that power with a 13B....even at those boost levels. Maybe something was wrong with the car
STEPHEN
#39
Weird Cat Man
Well I don't tune/test the cars, I just find dynos and put them in there.
As for me not seeing the Resourcemobile in the sig, I've had a hell of a day and I'm not thinking clearly... and I was in no mood to see what I thought was an "April Fools" type dyno in here....
Sorry for casting doubt without asking for a mods list first, that was my bad!
B
As for me not seeing the Resourcemobile in the sig, I've had a hell of a day and I'm not thinking clearly... and I was in no mood to see what I thought was an "April Fools" type dyno in here....
Sorry for casting doubt without asking for a mods list first, that was my bad!
B
#40
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
I apologize for calling BS without knowing it was a 3-rotor as well, although you might want to post a mods list next time...
I still stand by the fact that SAE numbers are more accurate and comparable than "actual". It is very easy to tweak the settings on a dyno to produce whatever numbers you want.
I still stand by the fact that SAE numbers are more accurate and comparable than "actual". It is very easy to tweak the settings on a dyno to produce whatever numbers you want.
#41
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SO take it out to a track already and see what mph you get on pump gas. We wont care if your ET sucks *****, I want to see a mph
Also, what is the weight of the car? Any idea?
PLEASE get a mph
STEPHEN
Also, what is the weight of the car? Any idea?
PLEASE get a mph
STEPHEN
#43
SAE numbers are NO more accurate than actual horsepower numbers. If you want the truth ACTUAL horsepower numbers are as accurate as you can get since they are the exact horsepower readings for his location. SAE is a means of standardizing horsepower readings thus elevation ect doesn't play as big a role. However SAE is less accurate because it isn't climate specific.
#44
PV = nRT
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand (was California)
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what you're saying is that if you tied a rope to the tow hook of this car and the other end to the necks of 600 horses, you could win a tug of war?
I DONT BELIEVE IT!!
I DONT BELIEVE IT!!
#45
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by ReodDai
SAE numbers are NO more accurate than actual horsepower numbers. If you want the truth ACTUAL horsepower numbers are as accurate as you can get since they are the exact horsepower readings for his location. SAE is a means of standardizing horsepower readings thus elevation ect doesn't play as big a role. However SAE is less accurate because it isn't climate specific.
SAE numbers are NO more accurate than actual horsepower numbers. If you want the truth ACTUAL horsepower numbers are as accurate as you can get since they are the exact horsepower readings for his location. SAE is a means of standardizing horsepower readings thus elevation ect doesn't play as big a role. However SAE is less accurate because it isn't climate specific.
However, comparisons with other dyno results are meaningless unless all numbers are SAE. And yes, SAE takes into account climate conditions as well as elevation.
#46
Well since 1000ft times are also location specific it seems more logical to use dyno times that are location specific as well =) However I like to keep both SAE and actual dyno sheets handy just for the fun of it.
#47
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the first part of of the thread with all the Bs was funny to those that knew it was a 3 rotor. I'm alo interested to see what kinda trap speeds you can get with that setup.
~Luke
~Luke
#48
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The land of Lincoln
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guestimating that the car weighs 2800 and Mike weighs 160. This brings the total weight to 2960 + 628 rwhp = 9.70 @ 139mph w/ good driving and track conditions
#49
3rd motors a charm I hope
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central New York
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Gargamel
Guestimating that the car weighs 2800 and Mike weighs 160. This brings the total weight to 2960 + 628 rwhp = 9.70 @ 139mph w/ good driving and track conditions
Guestimating that the car weighs 2800 and Mike weighs 160. This brings the total weight to 2960 + 628 rwhp = 9.70 @ 139mph w/ good driving and track conditions