3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

just been to dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-03, 04:26 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just been to dyno

Just had my fd on a dyno(dyno dynamics) and wondered if my results are good or not -279.1 rwhp @11 psi stock twins,dp,mp,blitz catback,fmic,intake slightly modified exaust ports.The dyno had my boost reading from the manifold but my boost controller takes its readings from the boost sensor-manifold 0.78 bar but my boost controller said 0.94bar does anyone know which would be accurate or should they be the same.Thanks guys,Royston uk.
Old 06-12-03, 05:17 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm a noob, so i can't really comment, but here is what i got (for comparison purposes)

93 base - With stock twins and no porting, and 62k miles... - just downpipe, cat back exhaust, FMIC, power FC... and upgraded fuel pump... my car put out 300 rwhp at 12 psi (or maybe 13psi). Couldnt up the boost because i have stock injectors running near its peak.
Old 06-12-03, 05:18 PM
  #3  
Full Member

 
TurboFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good but I think I would probably get some more power by turning up the boost a little.
Old 06-12-03, 06:24 PM
  #4  
Full Member

 
sporff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what ECU?
Old 06-12-03, 06:30 PM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
You guys, he ran that on a dyno dynamics. They read quite a bit lower than a dynojet.

Those are pretty good numbers Royston, but you may have a little room for improvement. What ecu ARE you using?
Old 06-12-03, 06:37 PM
  #6  
FxF
Dorifto Tengoku No More

 
FxF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: On the mountain of Thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: just been to dyno

Originally posted by royston
Just had my fd on a dyno(dyno dynamics) and wondered if my results are good or not -279.1 rwhp @11 psi stock twins,dp,mp,blitz catback,fmic,intake slightly modified exaust ports.The dyno had my boost reading from the manifold but my boost controller takes its readings from the boost sensor-manifold 0.78 bar but my boost controller said 0.94bar does anyone know which would be accurate or should they be the same.Thanks guys,Royston uk.
Do you have the stock ECU? What spec is your car? What type of dyno? Are you a member of FDUK?
Old 06-12-03, 06:43 PM
  #7  
Wankler

 
DaiOni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kobe, Japan
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The figures aren't that bad - as noted above, your running on a different dyno system. If you're using figures on here as a comparison, then you would be dissapointed
Old 06-12-03, 06:44 PM
  #8  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Godzilla-T78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If your running a stock ecu, get ready for a rebuild bro. Get a standalone and see those figures go way up. and maybe you havnt damaged your engine to bad yet.
Old 06-12-03, 06:52 PM
  #9  
Junior Member

 
nakasaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey mate,

You are beating me at the moment.. I got 242 RWHP when I went to G-Force. Want to push that to 300 RWHP once I get the IC, rad, induction, injectors and fuel pump on there next month :p

You need to post your mods up here so we can see them - even I'm not sure what your mod list is!

My mod list is with my dyno graphs on my website:
http://www.fd3s.org/

You gonna be down in town on Sat night? If my clutch is fixed on Saturday I'll head down there

> Chaz <
Old 06-12-03, 07:18 PM
  #10  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just been to dyno

Ive got a power fc ,sorry forgot to mention that.My mods are power fc,intake fmic,1200 sec,bosch 044 pump and fpr,dp,mp,blitz catback and minor exhaust porting,i couldnt get boost past 11 psi for some reason.My boost controller said i was at .95 bar but on the dyno print out i was only on .77 bar and 11-1 afr and 284 ftlb@ 5400 rpm.I tried increasing the duty cycle higher but it had no effect.And yes i am in FDUK.Thanks Roy.
Old 06-12-03, 07:27 PM
  #11  
FxF
Dorifto Tengoku No More

 
FxF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: On the mountain of Thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: just been to dyno

Originally posted by royston
Ive got a power fc ,sorry forgot to mention that.My mods are power fc,intake fmic,1200 sec,bosch 044 pump and fpr,dp,mp,blitz catback and minor exhaust porting,i couldnt get boost past 11 psi for some reason.My boost controller said i was at .95 bar but on the dyno print out i was only on .77 bar and 11-1 afr and 284 ftlb@ 5400 rpm.I tried increasing the duty cycle higher but it had no effect.And yes i am in FDUK.Thanks Roy.
Wheren't you at the last dyno session they had?
Sorry to say that but your turbos seem do the damage. Check them.
Old 06-12-03, 07:35 PM
  #12  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just been on dyno

No this is the first time ive taken my car to the dyno,you must be getting me mixed up with somebody else from fduk.
Old 06-12-03, 08:05 PM
  #13  
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Dyno Dynamics reads about 7-10% lower HP than a dynojet from what I have heard.
Old 06-12-03, 08:35 PM
  #14  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
suprfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: home
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
he is making 284 ft lbs and 279 HP. is something wrong or is it a tough setup?
kris
Old 06-12-03, 08:41 PM
  #15  
Full Member

 
sporff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i sure hope so. that sounds kinda low for those mods
Old 06-12-03, 08:41 PM
  #16  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by suprfast
he is making 284 ft lbs and 279 HP. is something wrong or is it a tough setup?
kris
I agree. Royston, perhaps you have a SMALL boost leak. I can't see how you could only get 11 psi with a midpipe, regardless if the wastegate is wide open or not. I would remove all the couplers/IC tubing and check carefully for cracks or leaks.
Old 06-13-03, 07:40 AM
  #17  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
i think avg is:

300 @ 12 psi
315 @ 13psi
325 @ 14psi
340 @ 15psi.

for a stock port stock turbos all the bolton FD
Old 06-13-03, 08:14 AM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(sorry not to steal thread) hmm, so what you guys are telling me.. is i might be 15 rwhp low if mine was on 13psi... (second post on this thread shows what i have).
Old 06-13-03, 08:17 AM
  #19  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally posted by nycrx7
(sorry not to steal thread) hmm, so what you guys are telling me.. is i might be 15 rwhp low if mine was on 13psi... (second post on this thread shows what i have).
do you have a mp? You didnt list it. so 300rwhp is great without it.
Old 06-13-03, 09:13 AM
  #20  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just been to dyno

When my car was on the dyno my boost controller was reading .95 bar(connected to boost sensor)but on the dyno graph my boost was a steady .77bar(taken from nipple on manifold) why is there such a difference and which would be the correct boost pressure reading.Had a look and i cant find any leaks.
Old 06-13-03, 09:19 AM
  #21  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just been to dyno

MY flywheel hp was 330.5 @ 7100rpm and torque is 284 ftlb @5400rpm.I would post graph but i dont know how to.Roy uk.
Old 06-13-03, 09:54 AM
  #22  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
suprfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: home
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
im sorry, i should have clarified myself a tad more. i just found it weird to have more TQ than HP. whats the secret
kris
Old 06-13-03, 10:26 AM
  #23  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just been to dyno

There is no secret,Im only running base mod timing maps with 12 degree split in boost areas and pulled out a little timing at transition and after peak torque.Would any of the pfc forum maps be any better or is it not that simple.Thanks Roy.
Old 06-13-03, 12:30 PM
  #24  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
suprfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: home
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
not that simple. asking in the ECU section would get you tons of help, but the maps are just for ballparks. i have one in my car and it smells more like exxon in my car than at the gas station.
kris
Old 06-13-03, 01:30 PM
  #25  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by matty
do you have a mp? You didnt list it. so 300rwhp is great without it.
Thanks Matty - you are right, i do not have a mid pipe - still have the stock CAT.


Quick Reply: just been to dyno



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.