3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Jet hot coating to improve performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-04 | 02:24 PM
  #26  
Mazdabation's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 5
From: Ancaster Ontario, Canada
This is a place aprox 2hrs from me here in Canada. According to their site, there is no clearence issues at all for anything. Depending on the part of course, they will use different grades/types of ceramic. Give it a read and it tells you the thickness of the coating and how they use it on pistons etc
http://www.fireballcoatings.com/index.htm
Old 02-04-04 | 05:22 PM
  #27  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
My bad, I was thinking of the Jet-Hot coating, which would be far too thick to avoid clearance problems.
Old 02-04-04 | 05:55 PM
  #28  
BATMAN's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley Bay Area
my guy used the near chrome for the UIM.

I didn't do the TB since I don't know how to take it apart.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:23 PM
  #29  
Mazdabation's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 5
From: Ancaster Ontario, Canada
Originally posted by Kento
My bad, I was thinking of the Jet-Hot coating, which would be far too thick to avoid clearance problems.
If im correct, isn't Jet-Hot just the name of the company? They do the same as what the company by me does, its just there name has been used so much its like it has become "the type" of coating. I havent looked into Jet-Hots site, but should it not be the same thickness as Fireball coatings? It is all ceramic and I would think applied the same. So why would Jet hot have clearence issues and Fireball doesnt?? Anyone?
Old 02-04-04 | 07:34 PM
  #30  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
No, the two coatings are different. The header coating is actually a metallic/ceramic mix that is sprayed on using a conventional type of paint spray gun, and then oven-cured at over 500 degrees F. The true ceramic coating for internal engine parts is actually applied using a process known as "plasma spraying", which is literally like "welding" the coating onto the surface. A high-intensity electrical arc discharged in an inert gas superheats the ceramic coating powder and literally "shoots" it into the surface to be coated, which forms a sub-metallic bond.

Both coatings insulate against heat, but the plasma sprayed coating is far, far thinner, and forms an actual metallic bond with the material, whereas the header coating is still a "paint" type coating.
Old 02-04-04 | 07:45 PM
  #31  
Mazdabation's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 5
From: Ancaster Ontario, Canada
Ahhhhhh so would the Fireball coatings be plasma, and the Jet-hot be the paint type?
Old 02-04-04 | 07:52 PM
  #32  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
It appears that Fireball sells both types of coatings. You cannot use the spray-on/oven-cured metallic ceramic coating on internal engine parts.
Old 02-04-04 | 07:53 PM
  #33  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
http://www.airborncoatings.com/

They did my LIM, Y-pipe, Intakes

Jet-Hot 2000 to the DP

Airborn did a great job on all the work as did Jet-Hot. Airborn took about a week with Jet-hot 2 days.
Old 02-04-04 | 08:01 PM
  #34  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
.

Last edited by evot23; 02-04-04 at 08:30 PM.
Old 02-04-04 | 08:51 PM
  #35  
krazywli19's Avatar
krazyeli19

 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: texas
To find out whether you should wrap or coat a part look at the differential temperature between your engine bay and the air inside the parts you want to coat. If the engine bay air is cooler than the air inside your the parts you want to coat, then its not beneficial at all to do so as all that will do is keep the heat inside your parts instead of letting the cooler engine bay air cool it (differential) and allow amounts of heat to disperse out. If you want a coating that is made just to disperse heat then swaintech makes a coating for you that is black in color. Here it is on a oil pan, the owner recorded a 10 degree drop in oil temps just from the coating.
http://www.soundkwest.com/mr2/22oilpansm.jpg

What I have experienced and feel, keep the coatings for the exhaust side of things.

Last edited by krazywli19; 02-04-04 at 08:55 PM.
Old 02-05-04 | 02:20 AM
  #36  
damian's Avatar
DragonFly
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,244
Likes: 9
From: Minnesota
I did the jet-hot thing a long time ago...
here is my downpipe jethot coated:



Old 02-05-04 | 02:20 PM
  #37  
rotarynemesis's Avatar
Thread Starter
FD Maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville FL
Originally posted by krazywli19
To find out whether you should wrap or coat a part look at the differential temperature between your engine bay and the air inside the parts you want to coat. If the engine bay air is cooler than the air inside your the parts you want to coat, then its not beneficial at all to do so as all that will do is keep the heat inside your parts instead of letting the cooler engine bay air cool it (differential) and allow amounts of heat to disperse out.
Ok to me this makes no sense. He is saying that if the air inside the part is hotter than the engine bay temp then dont coat it so the hot air will dissapate in to the engine bay to cool the part down.

I thought the whole point was to keep engine bay temps down and to keep the hot air inside the parts to get it out of the engine bay.

Also what some other have said about the intake side seems to make sense because they are saying that the part will heat up and then the hot air will not be able to get out. But if the hot air cant get out then how does it get in to the part in the first place?
Old 02-05-04 | 02:49 PM
  #38  
alberto_mg's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
From: nyc+li, ny
Originally posted by rotarynemesis
Ok to me this makes no sense. He is saying that if the air inside the part is hotter than the engine bay temp then dont coat it so the hot air will dissapate in to the engine bay to cool the part down.

I thought the whole point was to keep engine bay temps down and to keep the hot air inside the parts to get it out of the engine bay.

Also what some other have said about the intake side seems to make sense because they are saying that the part will heat up and then the hot air will not be able to get out. But if the hot air cant get out then how does it get in to the part in the first place?
You are correct. Keep engine bay temps down and keep hot air inside the exhaust. Helps with scavenging if I remember correctly and helps turbos boost quicker. Don't remember why turbo boost quicker though...

Correct again with your comments about hot air getting in/out. Air moves and it only gets in from the air filter. Such is the concept of vacuum and air flow and such.
Old 02-05-04 | 04:23 PM
  #39  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 22
From: Hershey PA
Re: Jet hot coating to improve performance

Originally posted by rotarynemesis
If you jet hot coat different parts under the hood would that improve performance?

Im talking about coating the downpipe, turbo exhaust housing, turbo manifold, uim, lim, tb, elbow, intercooler pipes.

Would any of that help? Because what I'm thinking is by coating the exhaust parts it would keep the heat from getting out of the exhaust into the engine bay and by coating the intercooler pipes and uim and the rest it would keep the heat from getting in and keep temp cooler.

Would this work??
Coating the DP is a common thing, and may work. I didn't - I felt the airflow around it and the spacing to the motor was sufficient. Maybe coating the turbo manifold will help, but somehow I think that's a waste.

For everything else you listed, it will not help, IMO. Or at least not enough to make it worthwhile. The best way to lower intake temps is a better flowing intake and larger intercooler.

Dave
Old 02-05-04 | 08:29 PM
  #40  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
I think krazywli19's comments were in regards to the intake piping. I think his recommendation makes sense for the intake side:

air filter to turbo(s)? Wrap/coat. The air in the pipes is cooler than the surroundings.
turbo to IC? Don't wrap or coat. The air in the pipes is hotter than their surroundings under boost, which is when you care about the intake temps the most.
IC to TB? Wrap/coat.
UIM/LIM? Wrap/coat.

I'm not saying the benefit is worth the cost for each of these, but rather just trying to clarify which parts it might be beneficial to coat.

The exhaust side is sort of the opposite approach (keep the stuff in the pipes hot), but the stuff in the pipes is always hotter than the engine bay, so wrap/coat it all.

Exhaust manifold? Wrap/coat.
Turbine housing(s)? Wrap/coat.
Downpipe? Wrap/coat.

Think about the FLOW of heat, not just how hot something is likely to get or not get. For instance, you want to keep the air that flows through the intake manifolds cool. That air should be cooler than the environment around the manifold itself, so coating it makes sense. You reduce the flow of heat from the hot engine bay into your intake air. If the manifold is hot, the (thermal barrier) coating will slow it from cooling down. But guess what? It would have been the intake air flowing through it that cooled it, so you don't want that. The goal is really just to slow down the rate at which the heat from around the manifold will be transferred to the intake air that is flowing through it.

I was wondering about coating the top of the manifold with a thermal barrier. Coating the bottom seems like a clear choice since there is a lot of heat under there. Coating the LIM is an easy choice, too, since it is close to the hot exhaust and turbo stuff. But there are coatings designed to help a part shed heat. Would that be of benefit for the top of the manifold? It seems to be the normal approach for V8 manifolds? However, I am still pretty sure that the intercooled air flowing into the manifold is cooler than the air that surrounds the UIM, even on top. That makes me think a thermal barrier coating on the whole manifold (inside and out) would be a good idea.

I am doing a rebuild now and I am planning to try some coatings on various parts while everything is apart, so this thread is particularly timely for me.

I do have a question: Is there any concern over the coating coming off in chips from the insides of the intake runners?

-Max
Old 02-05-04 | 08:39 PM
  #41  
DCrosby's Avatar
No it's not Turbo'd
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles, Ca
I would say yes especially if the chips are large and metallic.... that's why I would only coat the exterior, since I'd hate to have something like that ratteling around in the rotor houseing or heaven forbid the turbo ...
Old 02-05-04 | 08:46 PM
  #42  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Yeah, but how great are the chances that it actually *would* come off? I agree that it would be very bad if it did.

-Max
Old 02-05-04 | 08:49 PM
  #43  
krazywli19's Avatar
krazyeli19

 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: texas
Yes, sorry if I didnt make it clear. I'm only talking about the intake side. Wrap everything you can on the exhaust side.
Old 02-05-04 | 08:57 PM
  #44  
alberto_mg's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
From: nyc+li, ny
<QUOTE>I do have a question: Is there any concern over the coating coming off in chips from the insides of the intake runners?</QUOTE>

Good question. It would probably depend upon the coating. I think that is a question for the manufacturer. If it bonds on a semi-molecular level, it would probably NOT flake.
Old 02-05-04 | 09:03 PM
  #45  
rallimike's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 292
Likes: 1
From: Reading, PA
Max, your logic is impeccable. Some ceramic coating sites recommend an insulating coat on the underside and a heat dissipating coat on the upper side. I went with insulating inside and out, because I used a phenolic spacer between the UIM and LIM to prevent conduction, and figured the insulation on the inside would prevent heat transfer to the air moving through it. I think it worked.
Old 02-10-04 | 09:45 AM
  #46  
alberto_mg's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
From: nyc+li, ny
I just spoke with jet hot yesterday.

They said it was only necessary to do the externals on the intake manifolds. Price is somewhere between $150-180. They do internal and external on exhaust side components.

I'm gonna have to search on Mike's phenolic spacer jammy as I have no clue wtf that is
Old 02-10-04 | 10:55 AM
  #47  
rallimike's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 292
Likes: 1
From: Reading, PA
spacer

Phenolic spacers have had some minor discussion on these boards. It is an insulator between the LIM and UIM. A web search will turn up a fair amount of sites that sell them, but not for RX7s. I think Autospeed did a piece on them a while back.
Old 02-10-04 | 12:24 PM
  #48  
BATMAN's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley Bay Area
That would address heat issues related to conduction, but not the hot air in the engine bay that heats the UIM and LIM and other components.

Coating it would help with both conduction and convection issues.......
Old 02-10-04 | 12:50 PM
  #49  
Junior Member

 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
Ive always been told not to use the exhaust wraps because they cause heat fatigue and stress on the componet which eventually will lead to the peice cracking or breaking apart.
Old 02-10-04 | 01:03 PM
  #50  
BATMAN's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley Bay Area
that might be true, but ceramic coating on the inside will reduce the amount of heat that is transferred to the actual metal surface by as much as 35%......


Quick Reply: Jet hot coating to improve performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.