3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

high revs, myth or fact?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-04 | 03:24 PM
  #26  
KaiFD3S's Avatar
SINFUL7
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
I agree with Jim even if your car can rev to 8000 rpm's it doesnt mean you have power up there, I normally shift at about 7300 to 7500...
Old 09-11-04 | 03:38 PM
  #27  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 32
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by neit_jnf
I agree the program overly simplifies things in it's original form but you can build a custom power curve and have the program calculate the rest
As I said, I have CarTest 2000 also. That's not what the chart you posted is showing.

also all the drivetrain, tire and aerodynamic losses can be changed.
The top speed calculations break down after a certain point. It seems to work fairly well for stock and mildly modified cars, however.

Notice how the imaginary car can't go past ~162mph because it's power matches the losses? I'd think it is a very close aproximation for a stock FD.
You are right, I didn't pay attention to the loss curve where top speed was concerned. I was looking at the terminal speed shown for each gear, which is obviously not real world. You cannot hit the calculated gear-limited speed. Ever wondered why on paper 4th gear should be good for about 149 mph, yet you shift from 4th to 5th at about 140?

I like playing with all the different parameters and see how the estimated ET and trap speed change.
I did too. However, from real world results with engines producing less power in heavier cars, I know for a fact that my engine is capable of better performance in the quarter mile than what CarTest was estimating. That was another reason I stopped using it.
Old 09-11-04 | 03:49 PM
  #28  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 12
From: Eugene, OR, usa
I run my car up to redline often but cruising around town I keep it around 2000-3000 rpm. No need to be cruising along in 2nd gear at 35mph. Revving it constantly increases engine wear and engine temp.
Old 09-13-04 | 11:14 AM
  #29  
RX 4 Speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
1993 VR FD Touring

 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: USA
I agree with most of you... revving it up constantly increases engine wear and engine temp... shortening the life of your engine. But then again, what fun is it shifting at 3k rpm anyways??? In short, rev it up every so often to give it some excercise...
Old 09-13-04 | 11:25 AM
  #30  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,306
Likes: 18
From: Fort Kickass
Originally Posted by RX 4 Speed
guys... just have a question for you all. I've heard both responses to whether or not it is actually good for our car's engine to be revved up when driving. Will the life of our engine actually LAST LONGER if it is revved up often? and if so, how often and how high? I mean, in spirited driving, I probably try to shift at 5k, but how often should I be doing this? 1x a week? 2x week? and how high for rpm's? I heard that the apex seals will actually get brittle and a big reason for them failing is because we "baby" our cars too much... which is true? thanks for the help.
Apex seals do not get more brittle. However, the springs underneath can set if the car isn't driven or started at all for extended periods of time. This is different than babying it.

IMO, running it hard when the engine is cold (I too watch for 180F water temp) is destructive. Driving hard regularly on a warmed engine will shorten the life of many components, but how much I don't know. Since heat from the turbos is the significant difference between the 13B-REW and it's shortened lifespan vs. the NA 13Bs that last for triple the mileage, I'd say running it hard (under boost) will shorten the engine life for certain.

Babying it completely isn't really bad as long as the car doesn't sit for long periods. It's not like our cars have valves to gunk up.

Dave

Last edited by dgeesaman; 09-13-04 at 11:34 AM.
Old 09-13-04 | 11:28 AM
  #31  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 824
From: San Diego, CA
If I remember correctly:

According to the Mazda training video on the rotary engine, our power plant is designed so that high revs actually remove carbon deposits from the housing walls. I guess the real question is how high is high revs?
Old 09-13-04 | 02:04 PM
  #32  
RX 4 Speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
1993 VR FD Touring

 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: USA
true... how high is HIGH? At what point does it go from removing carbs safely to adding serious wear? Of course, this is all when the car is warmed up...
Old 09-13-04 | 03:05 PM
  #33  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
during normal driving, highest ill rev is 3500, i kinda have to cause the car has no low end torque since im non seq, i have to rev it that high to get moving even a little or to keep up with the pace..

but i try to hit 7500 at least twice once a week..most of the time i hit it twice all in the same trip..then i think im putting to much on her and i let her rest for more than 24 hours hahahahahahaha

hot damn, i treat this car like a bitch!! LOL
Old 09-13-04 | 03:47 PM
  #34  
NinjaMajik's Avatar
Rotor Retard
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
I like the drive it like you stole it mentality. 4-5K shifts daily are my only method of transportation, I'm glad this car can handle it.

I love learning more and more about my rx-7!
Old 09-13-04 | 04:44 PM
  #35  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Jim has pointed out that shifting at a little over 7500 is going to give you the best performance. I agree. It appears that Mazda agrees too. That may be why they installed a buzzer to tell you to shift. If you are at WOT, by the time you shift after hearing the buzzer, you will have shifted at the optimal rpm.

It could also be that Mazda didn't want people to over rev the engine
Old 09-13-04 | 05:21 PM
  #36  
Gargamel's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
From: The land of Lincoln
you'll def be slower if you rev higher than the engine can flow. Running mine at the track, I can lose 3 mph going through the traps by shifting too late.
Old 09-13-04 | 06:30 PM
  #37  
TwinTriangles's Avatar
What's an RX-7 ?
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: MN
[QUOTE=jimlab]some people are just fascinated with high rpm and they're not aware that their engine isn't making any more power in that range.

Not if you've got a big race port...
Old 09-13-04 | 07:17 PM
  #38  
jimlab's Avatar
Super Snuggles
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 32
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by TwinTriangles
Not if you've got a big race port...
Which is probably why I ended the post with...
Bottom line, if you're not making any more power, there's no reason to make the engine turn faster. High rpm puts more strain on the internals and accelerates wear. Find out what your power curve looks like and then calculate the proper shift points by finding the point at which maximum (peak) torque at the axles in the next higher gear exceeds torque at the axles in the current gear. It's as simple as that.
Old 09-13-04 | 07:52 PM
  #39  
TwinTriangles's Avatar
What's an RX-7 ?
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: MN
Probably...
Old 09-14-04 | 01:48 AM
  #40  
mpfcc's Avatar
NRX7HVN
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
I usually shift at about 4-5k rpm daily driving, but I do spirited driving every time I drive the car so it's common for me to reach 8k rpm at some point during a commute...plus I heard rotaries love to be revved!
Old 09-30-04 | 04:37 PM
  #41  
Gargamel's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
From: The land of Lincoln
Originally Posted by Gargamel
you'll def be slower if you rev higher than the engine can flow. Running mine at the track, I can lose 3 mph going through the traps by shifting too late.
****, I was able to lose 11 mph from shifting too late last tuesday. No point in shifting past your max hp/torque.
Old 09-30-04 | 06:07 PM
  #42  
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Sled Driver
You have been watching too many Castrol oil commercials............

Let me see a show of hands of people who have "worn out" their engines??? Anyone????

OK, how about water/oil seals? Boy, I see a bunch of hands.......

Now apex seal due to ping'in, lean conditions??? All the rest of you.

Rev away my man, life is too short, like the quote above states, go for it.

If your concerned about wearing your engine out, you'll never use the car to it potential. (buy a civic)

Now if IM just repeating what everyone else said, sorry. I didn't waste my time reading every reply, just scaned the 1st page.
Now, I have had the impression in my head to take it easy untill I can afford to replace my engine but after all this I hear about not worring how often you give it some gas thats all I can think about is how much gas Im going to be shooting out my apexi exhaust! How do you guys that say you take it to higher rpms often afford the gas?? I mean Im so cheap I dont think I used my a/c once this summer and I live in St. Petersburg, FLORIDA!
Old 09-30-04 | 06:38 PM
  #43  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Ok I got a related question that I've been wanting to ask for a while... is there anything bad/wrong w/ revving your engine high but slowly/without boosting? Ex., I find it's much easier to get a very smooth shift at 5000rpm and up, yet when the speed limit's 35, and 5-0 is around, I'm not exactly gonna come off the line boosting lol. That, and if I haven't had a chance to give her a good run, at least I'm revving her high enough to clean out some carbon deposits. So i have - on occassion - slowly raised the revvs to 5, 6, or even 7K rpm w/o really getting on the gas. The boost guage remains at 0mmHg, but I dunno if this is bad, since a) she remains at higher revvs for a longer period of time, and b) I know the 2nd turbo is fully spooled but not boosting, since it comes online by 4500 - 5000 rpm...I'm wondering if going past that w/o producing boost has any ill effects?
Old 09-30-04 | 07:02 PM
  #44  
Tom93R1's Avatar
gross polluter
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 25
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by Gargamel
you'll def be slower if you rev higher than the engine can flow. Running mine at the track, I can lose 3 mph going through the traps by shifting too late.
I know this isnt the original point of the post, but when I drag I always end up taking 3rd out to around 105 (I think about 8100 rpm) because the top of 3rd comes so close to the end of the 1/4 that the time to shift to 4th will slow me down more than riding out that last few feet in 3rd. I guess I should just try taking 4th at the end and see if it changes anything.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
13
01-09-18 11:19 AM
RedBaronII
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-20-15 11:29 AM
localized
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
09-16-15 12:18 AM



Quick Reply: high revs, myth or fact?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.