3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Garfinkles rich man non-seq twins before/after pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-07, 12:54 AM
  #26  
Rx7 Wagon

iTrader: (16)
 
Narfle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Posts: 6,989
Received 875 Likes on 548 Posts
I see most guys here running about 11.5 but AHarada is right. I think your setups has a lot more left in it if you want it
Old 08-06-07, 06:29 AM
  #27  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
SportCoupe2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Savannah
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Barban
I see most guys here running about 11.5 but AHarada is right. I think your setups has a lot more left in it if you want it
Not unless I want to drop more money in it. My injector duty cycle is 86%. That's pretty much maxed for stock injectors for me. Going into the 90's is just too risky.
Old 08-06-07, 06:32 AM
  #28  
Call me gramps!

 
WaLieN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 2,334
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SportCoupe2
I read it as 433 hp at the wheels. A DynaPack is a chassis dyno, not an engine dyno.
It seems you have read incorrectly. It clearly states "Fly Wheel" on there.
Old 08-06-07, 07:35 AM
  #29  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,548
Received 543 Likes on 329 Posts
Originally Posted by SportCoupe2
Yes, I agree if you are talking piston engines. Rotarys need the extra fuel to live.
If you ever want more reliable power, pick up an Aquamist water injection kit, and you'll be able to run 15 psi with 11.5 AFRs all day long, and arguably a 'safer' setup than you have now from an anti-detonation standpoint. Of course, the longevity of the stock twins will probably be compromised a bit at those levels.
Old 08-06-07, 09:51 AM
  #30  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
SportCoupe2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Savannah
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WaLieN
It seems you have read incorrectly. It clearly states "Fly Wheel" on there.


Off topic but it clearly says chassis dyno. All DynaPacks are chassis dynos. I did see the flywheel correction you mentioned and it is purely a calculated number based on his 368 wheel hp and a guess on drivetrain losses. Still, great numbers but far from 433whp.
Old 08-06-07, 10:29 PM
  #31  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
pincusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basic question, and sorry if I don't understand what was done.
With all the cross over welded up in the manifold, and the prespool gate removed, how do you control the boost from the second turbo? The waste gate only controlling the primary. How is the inlet pressure controlled in the secondary turbo?
Old 08-06-07, 11:11 PM
  #32  
Rotor Head Extreme

iTrader: (8)
 
t-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by pincusa
Basic question, and sorry if I don't understand what was done.
With all the cross over welded up in the manifold, and the prespool gate removed, how do you control the boost from the second turbo? The waste gate only controlling the primary. How is the inlet pressure controlled in the secondary turbo?


The wastegate is only bleed from the primary turbo. The crossover to the pre-spool opening is eliminated to reduce the turbulence in that area. Since there is now no exhaust flow transition between both turbo's, this conversion basically utilizes the air flow of each individual exhaust runners and flows it to it's own turbo. From what I can see from the pics, there is still some room for improvement on that manifold to decrease lag. Anyone who understands Bernoulli's principle will know exactly what I'm talking about.
Old 08-07-07, 10:53 PM
  #33  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
GARCO MOTORWORKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: next to the polishing wheel!!!
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tthe prespool area is blocked to the turbo port ,the crosstube between the two turbos that goes to the wastegate is in the main manifold before the turbos . BOTH turbos are vented by the wastgate . I am not so dumb as to not control both turbos .
Old 08-08-07, 12:58 PM
  #34  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,864
Received 805 Likes on 475 Posts
good HP numbers. But I must say 12 psi by 3800 is the norm too bad I was hoping that you would get a little better than the rest of us.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Glazedham42
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
05-02-22 02:41 PM
Glazedham42
1st Gen Archive
2
09-01-15 08:20 PM



Quick Reply: Garfinkles rich man non-seq twins before/after pics



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.