3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Fuel Pressure Regulators question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-09 | 02:23 PM
  #1  
FD3S2005's Avatar
Thread Starter
SideWayZ The Only Way
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 10
From: Davie, Florida
Fuel Pressure Regulators question

just curious for people who have had them in, and for how long.. i bought an aeromotive one, i called pettit today because i will be getting the cool charge 3 and 1300s put in but once i told him about it the FPR, he says that the stock one is perfectly fine and the aftermarket ones tent to either leak or fail in about a year or so... just wondering what you guys think and how long you have had it in with no problems.

should i ask him to install it anyways since i already have it?
Old 02-16-09 | 02:35 PM
  #2  
papsmagu's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,258
Likes: 8
From: South Florida
i have had one in my car for over 4 years now with no problems or leaks. also had one on my previous FD with no problems. i would say install it.
Old 02-16-09 | 02:49 PM
  #3  
FD3S2005's Avatar
Thread Starter
SideWayZ The Only Way
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 10
From: Davie, Florida
he said he was busy at the time so it was a brief conversation and told me to email him, im asking for a quote.
Old 02-16-09 | 06:59 PM
  #4  
oo7arkman's Avatar
In the Garage

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
From: Central FL
I have had my aeromotive fpr for a little over a year now with no problems.
Old 02-16-09 | 08:18 PM
  #5  
puma's Avatar
canadian monster
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 0
From: Trois-Rivières, Qc, Can
they won't brake within a year obvioulsy but they do tend to be more leaky than the stock one, keeping the pressure for a shorter time inside the fuel rail when the car is shut off.

The stock would do perfect in your case, reason people change the fpr is because they have aftermarket fuel rail, on which the stock fpr cannot be installed. With your 1300cc, you have a stock fuel rail so stock fpr will work.

I would install a new one though as 15+years of hard heat tend to be hard on the rubber inside of it. Installing an aftermarket one will need some machining of the fuel rail, find fuel hoses and fittings, a place to install it, etc. it is a bigger job than just swapping a part.

just save the money on the installation and buy a new OEM one along with a new pulsation damper if that was not done yet. And sell the aftermarket afterwards.
Old 02-16-09 | 08:37 PM
  #6  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
I just went on this circular route and ended up purchasing OEM FPR and PD today using OEM mod injectors at 600cc and 1220 cc
Old 02-16-09 | 11:12 PM
  #7  
dabigesii's Avatar
Back to basics
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 854
Likes: 9
From: Crescent City
So to my understanding with my setup 850 prim and 1200 sec injectors, I should be able to use my stock fpr and not any problems with my fuel system...no matter what power i'm pushing out?
Old 02-16-09 | 11:54 PM
  #8  
2007 ZX-10's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: NC
why would you install a stocker when the Aeromotive is adjustable? I love mine...three years and counting, no leaks, nothin
Old 02-17-09 | 02:31 AM
  #9  
FD3S2005's Avatar
Thread Starter
SideWayZ The Only Way
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 10
From: Davie, Florida
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10
why would you install a stocker when the Aeromotive is adjustable? I love mine...three years and counting, no leaks, nothin
""Installing an aftermarket one will need some machining of the fuel rail, find fuel hoses and fittings, a place to install it, etc. it is a bigger job than just swapping a part.""
,
Old 02-17-09 | 10:28 PM
  #10  
puma's Avatar
canadian monster
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 0
From: Trois-Rivières, Qc, Can
Originally Posted by dabigesii
So to my understanding with my setup 850 prim and 1200 sec injectors, I should be able to use my stock fpr and not any problems with my fuel system...no matter what power i'm pushing out?
yes, they only thing that might show you it is time to upgrade is if you put a fuel pump big enough that the fpr isn't big enough to let go the excess fuel. The pressure would keep rising in the fuel rail.

you would need at least two fuel pumps on the same line to achieve that though.
Old 03-04-09 | 11:41 PM
  #11  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
gone in circles. Now building fuel delivery system with Canton 1 micron filter, Marren Pulsation Damper , SX Regulator, Goodridge 910 super flex kevlar/teflon hoses, reverse flow through moded stock rails. Already using rewired Cosmo pump and installing RC moded OEM injectors now 650/1220.
Old 03-06-09 | 06:21 PM
  #12  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
Just did a fuel system flow calculation of velocity changes as fuel goes from in line to fuel rail to interconnect hose to 2nd fuel rail to regulator. Mazda was not dumb in selecting flow direction Primary before secondary and rail ID's of 11 and 13 mm. As way Mazda set it up velocity in primary and secondary rails is within 4% of each other, whereas reserve flow has a 172% difference.

OEM setup ,in relative velocity units:
Inlet hose before damper 7.5
Primary Rail 1.58
Hose 5.1
Secondary Rail 1.52
Return hose after FPR 1.50

Reverse flow:
Inlet hose 7.5
Secondary Rail 2.21 (40% increase = pressure drop due to losses) ((would need to bore to 14 mm to get vel down to 1.5) not enough material)
Hose 18.0 (350% increase = Big pressure drop due to losses)
Primary Rail 0.81 (47% flow drop .. good but big imbalance between P/S injectors)
Return hose after FPR 1.50

Conclusion best balance is in OEM direction; this works because primary to secondary ID's decrease but so does flow due to primary bleed off. with 650/1220 injector ratio imbalance goes from 3.8% to 5.5% in other direction. To bring back to balance I need to bore primary rail out to 13.5mm (17/32 drill bit). Bringing final up'd capacity flow velocities to 1.57 in primary (down from 1.68) and 1.54 in secondary. Interconnect hose is at 5.21 up from 5.14, not much change however I am making an -6 connect using Goodrige 710 lines w/ 7 mm bore bring velocity down to 3.8 from stock 5.14
Old 03-08-09 | 05:54 AM
  #13  
pyro_racer_0016's Avatar
touge******
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, Missouri
i have the aeromotive one that comes in the rx7store ultimate fuel system and have had it for 4 years its all hooked up with -6 an fittings and stainless steel braided lines the only thing that leaked was a fuel injector o-ring cause it got pinched when i pushed it in the rail. that fuel pressure regulator is known for not causing leaks because it has a built in fuel pulse damper which is what leaks and causes all the fires in our cars in the first place. and running a stock fpr without the fpd is known to cause injector leaks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 05:40 PM
Rotospectre
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
03-28-18 04:33 PM
86glxNA
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
08-22-15 09:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 PM.