Finally cut a 12 second pass
#26
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by JoeD
OUCH...did I say anything bad?
The truth must really hurt.
OUCH...did I say anything bad?
The truth must really hurt.
And I was hoping this would be a positive post.....
Rich
#27
Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
What exactly are you trying to say?
What exactly are you trying to say?
Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Maybe I'm just a ******' shitty driver.
Maybe I'm just a ******' shitty driver.
Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
What do you trap in Mommy's Mercedes?
What do you trap in Mommy's Mercedes?
Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Hopefully LaBreck will happen upon this post and bitchslap you like he always does .
Hopefully LaBreck will happen upon this post and bitchslap you like he always does .
#28
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Well, that was a surprisingly mature reply to my rant. I've trapped as high as 114 at this track.....as far as what you think I should be trapping, where are you gathering your info from?
Rich
Rich
#29
Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Well, that was a surprisingly mature reply to my rant.
Well, that was a surprisingly mature reply to my rant.
Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
I've trapped as high as 114 at this track.....as far as what you think I should be trapping, where are you gathering your info from?
I've trapped as high as 114 at this track.....as far as what you think I should be trapping, where are you gathering your info from?
As to where I am getting my info? Being a member of this forum for more than two years and seeing what FDs of similar power run, and generally seeing cars of similar (~2800) weight and power.
#31
I don't know what all the complainting is about. A 112mph trap speed does not reflect 360+rwhp. I don't know what rwhp he had at that time but it was not 360+. If he had 360+rwhp the mph would be at least 117. It's a matter of physics.
Trust me I know and if LaBreck gets on here he will agree.
Ken
Trust me I know and if LaBreck gets on here he will agree.
Ken
Last edited by LUV94RX7; 11-10-02 at 08:16 AM.
#32
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by LUV94RX7
I don't know what all the complainting is about. A 112mph trap speed does not reflect 360+rwhp. I don't know what rwhp he had at that time but it was not 360+. If he had 360+rwhp the mph would be at least 117. It's a matter of physics.
Trust me I know and if LaBreck gets on here he will agree.
Ken
I don't know what all the complainting is about. A 112mph trap speed does not reflect 360+rwhp. I don't know what rwhp he had at that time but it was not 360+. If he had 360+rwhp the mph would be at least 117. It's a matter of physics.
Trust me I know and if LaBreck gets on here he will agree.
Ken
I don't think you guys understand the crappy conditions this track offers--maybe wankel power can toss in his opinion.
Regardless, I'm happy as a pig in ****....the street car that cuts a sub-13 pass at Temple/Academy is few and far between .
#33
Re: Finally cut a 12 second pass
[i]
Me Iroc
R/T 0.54 0.69
60FT 2.13 2.30
330FT 5.55 5.87
1/8ET 8.40 8.75
1/8MPH 89.57 86.25
1/4ET 12.76 13.18
1/4MPH 112.16 111.00
WINNER 0.56
Needless to say, I'm pretty damn happy. I've trapped 114 at the track before, and I know I can get deeper into the 12s. I'm still running my original turbos with 92k miles (at 13psi on this particular pass) and a high flow cat. Thought I'd share with you guys . [/B]
Me Iroc
R/T 0.54 0.69
60FT 2.13 2.30
330FT 5.55 5.87
1/8ET 8.40 8.75
1/8MPH 89.57 86.25
1/4ET 12.76 13.18
1/4MPH 112.16 111.00
WINNER 0.56
Needless to say, I'm pretty damn happy. I've trapped 114 at the track before, and I know I can get deeper into the 12s. I'm still running my original turbos with 92k miles (at 13psi on this particular pass) and a high flow cat. Thought I'd share with you guys . [/B]
Too many tune at the ragged edge and end up blowing up in different environments. Dave, I think, tries to tune conservatively so you don't blow up when the environment changes.
I'd rather be reliable and sacrafice a little performance and not blow up.
I hope he does the same for me in the next two weeks.
Ken, 58 years young
'94 white, pep, red leather,
mods: Hayes/KDR street port & polished,
3mm Hurley racing seals,
upgraded coolant seals,
Power FC ecu, Commander, Datalogit,
XS T04e single turbo kit,
GReddy SMIC (400+cu.in.),
Aquamist 2s water injection kit,
Pettit ss resonated MP,
Pettit ss cat-back,
RP Racing fuel pump,
1600cc injectors,
Profec B(16&22psi),
3-Bar Map Sensor,
Centerforce clutch,
Racelogic Traction Control,
Under pulley kit (no air pump),
Pettit short shifter kit,
LaBreck's bushings,
Evans Coolant
http:///luv94rx7.html
#34
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Thanks for the constructive post, Ken. This thread was degrading for a little while there. Also, I know you'll be very happy with Dave's tuning---you're 100% correct about the safety.
As an aside....how do you like the LaBreck bushings?
Rich
As an aside....how do you like the LaBreck bushings?
Rich
#35
As an aside....how do you like the LaBreck bushings?
How do I know. I have not seen my car for 20 months.
Dave says the bushings make the car run like it is on rails. Should help cure wheel hop too.
Whatever JIMLAB says you can take it to the bank. He's working on unbreakable differential parts for his monster FD V8 now. That will be a winner, if he does it, for all the high-performance drag racers.
Ken
How do I know. I have not seen my car for 20 months.
Dave says the bushings make the car run like it is on rails. Should help cure wheel hop too.
Whatever JIMLAB says you can take it to the bank. He's working on unbreakable differential parts for his monster FD V8 now. That will be a winner, if he does it, for all the high-performance drag racers.
Ken
#36
GoodfellaFD3S: hope I didn't offend you
you guys seem to have had it with JoeD....hopefully not me also
here let me rephrase.....can't 60 foot times be really good even with street tires and practice? Like almost 2 flat or below?
great job on the 12s I know when I hit 12s next time I'm gonna have a huge grin on my face and I'll be happy cause I made the rx7 look good in front of everyone watching and maybe they'll learn about rotary power!
you guys seem to have had it with JoeD....hopefully not me also
here let me rephrase.....can't 60 foot times be really good even with street tires and practice? Like almost 2 flat or below?
great job on the 12s I know when I hit 12s next time I'm gonna have a huge grin on my face and I'll be happy cause I made the rx7 look good in front of everyone watching and maybe they'll learn about rotary power!
#38
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by Snook
GoodfellaFD3S: hope I didn't offend you
you guys seem to have had it with JoeD....hopefully not me also
here let me rephrase.....can't 60 foot times be really good even with street tires and practice? Like almost 2 flat or below?
great job on the 12s I know when I hit 12s next time I'm gonna have a huge grin on my face and I'll be happy cause I made the rx7 look good in front of everyone watching and maybe they'll learn about rotary power!
GoodfellaFD3S: hope I didn't offend you
you guys seem to have had it with JoeD....hopefully not me also
here let me rephrase.....can't 60 foot times be really good even with street tires and practice? Like almost 2 flat or below?
great job on the 12s I know when I hit 12s next time I'm gonna have a huge grin on my face and I'll be happy cause I made the rx7 look good in front of everyone watching and maybe they'll learn about rotary power!
initially I was annoyed b/c I didn't understand what you were saying.
I've seen 2 flat 60 foot times. You're not going to see much better on street tires--the traction isn't there, bottom line. And as you make more power, wheel hop gets more pronounced. I'm sure you can get a bit lower by experimenting with tire pressures and suspension settings.
Yes indeed, the V8s know not to **** with me....especially when I tell them I'm faster above 100. You should see the look on their face when I say, "4th gear (from 100 to 140) is my strongest gear....when I finish the 1/4, I'm just getting started. So, you wanna go race on the highway ?" They're like,
#39
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by RICKRX7
Rich
Just before this threat turned into a war, I asked a question about your IC fan. Does your FD have a noticeable performance gain W/ the IC fan on?
Thanks
Rick
Rich
Just before this threat turned into a war, I asked a question about your IC fan. Does your FD have a noticeable performance gain W/ the IC fan on?
Thanks
Rick
The main benefits I have realized from the fans:
cruising around at speeds below 60mph I see the temps drop down around 5 degrees.
At the road course it definitely helps---the more air, the better when you're constantly on it. My intake temps don't skyrocket as high.
At the strip, the main benefit is to spray water into the duct and have the fans suck it through the fins in between runs. Helps keep the IC from heat soaking so much. By doing this I can keep my intake temps manageable---around 40-50, whereas they used to jump to 70 after repeated runs in the texas heat.
Last edited by GoodfellaFD3S; 11-10-02 at 12:19 PM.
#40
Originally posted by JoeD
OUCH...did I say anything bad?
The truth must really hurt.
OUCH...did I say anything bad?
The truth must really hurt.
How is your Dad's car anyway?
#41
Originally posted by ZeroBanger
its funny. Every time I meet someone from the forum and we talk about trolls your name comes up.
its funny. Every time I meet someone from the forum and we talk about trolls your name comes up.
But would you be surprised if I said we have actually met before?
#45
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 172
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
I have a 94 with 23k on the engine and turbos running 15psi and ran a 13.2. I think the car needs to be tuned! I have a p-fc,apexi intake, no cat, fuel pump, dp, a center force clutch, DO NOT EVER BUY ONE JUST SO ANY ONE KNOWS!!. It only lasted 20k. fmic, and radiator.
#46
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 172
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
I have a 94 with 23k on the engine and turbos running 15psi and ran a 13.2. I think the car needs to be tuned! I have a p-fc,apexi intake, no cat, fuel pump, dp, a center force clutch, DO NOT EVER BUY ONE JUST SO ANY ONE KNOWS!!. It only lasted 20k. fmic, and radiator.
www.rxjet@aol.com
www.rxjet@aol.com
#47
Originally posted by 2-Rotor
Rich, your still on your original set of turbos at 92,000 miles damn!! Who said stock twins dont last longer then 60-80k miles. Thats what happens when someone who knows how to take care of an FD owns it. Good job with the 1/4 mile time.
Marc
Rich, your still on your original set of turbos at 92,000 miles damn!! Who said stock twins dont last longer then 60-80k miles. Thats what happens when someone who knows how to take care of an FD owns it. Good job with the 1/4 mile time.
Marc
Charlie
#48
Originally posted by stokedxiv
my thoughts exactly, 92,000 and going strong! nice times too... i'm impressed
Charlie
my thoughts exactly, 92,000 and going strong! nice times too... i'm impressed
Charlie
#49
12.7 at 112 is very respectable on a poopy track. Wheels will slow you down a little and cool air always helps - I'm sure your turbos are wearing down since they are original. I'll get my BNR twins in soon. If they perform the way they are supposed to I'm sure they would add some mph to your traps Nice run even though other people don't think so
#50
Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
There should be an option when you initially start a thread to prevent certain people from posting in your thread. I think I'm going to post this in the 'suggestions' section....
Rich
There should be an option when you initially start a thread to prevent certain people from posting in your thread. I think I'm going to post this in the 'suggestions' section....
Rich
As far as track conditions...i would think they would have a greater impact on ET then trap speed.
I am not dissing on you goodfella just stating my experiences.