3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Factory or Custom Alignment?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-04, 10:12 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
pincusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Factory or Custom Alignment?

After finishing replacing the rear pillow bearings, dropping my front subframe, and replacing both tie rods, my car is heading to the alignment rack sometime this week. Still being new to the FDs I was wondering if everyone runs stock alignment specs or if there's a common setting the people like. I plan to keep it on the street and don't have any plans to track the car. Do people like a little more camber in the front for the corners?

Thanks
Old 10-11-04, 10:15 AM
  #2  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Arrow

Try the Pettit Long Track specs:
http://www.jimagu.com/tinou/pettit_alignment.jpg
Old 10-11-04, 10:42 AM
  #3  
Do it right, do it once

iTrader: (30)
 
turbojeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Eugene, OR, usa
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
If it is street driven stick with close to stock specs if not completely stock.

I've run anywhere from -1.1 to -2.2 camber since I auto-x a lot. It makes the car dartier on the street and isn't worth the improved grip for street only use.
Old 10-11-04, 10:44 AM
  #4  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (6)
 
Section8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Running more negative camber than stock settings will wear your tires faster too.
Old 10-11-04, 10:47 AM
  #5  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
pincusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys. It will give me a good starting point to pay with.
Old 10-11-04, 10:50 AM
  #6  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
Fatman0203's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MIA
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Try the Pettit Long Track specs:
http://www.jimagu.com/tinou/pettit_alignment.jpg

Those are'nt stock are they?
Old 10-11-04, 12:11 PM
  #7  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Fatman0203
Those are'nt stock are they?
Nope.
Old 10-11-04, 12:26 PM
  #8  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
Fatman0203's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MIA
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Nope.
How aggresive are the petit stats? Im sorry I cant read alignment specs. Are they to aggresive for a daily driver or a weekend driver?
Old 10-11-04, 12:30 PM
  #9  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Fatman0203
How aggresive are the petit stats? Im sorry I cant read alignment specs. Are they to aggresive for a daily driver or a weekend driver?
IMO, the long track settings aren't too aggressive for the street. They seem to be a very good compromise for street/track.
Old 10-11-04, 06:28 PM
  #10  
No More 7

iTrader: (1)
 
saburo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all those hours playing gran turismo 3 finally pay off!
Old 01-30-05, 08:09 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
BlackRX7Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
IMO, the long track settings aren't too aggressive for the street. They seem to be a very good compromise for street/track.
I saw a huge difference in the front and rear camber between the 16" vs. 17" wheel... what if you drive 17" wheels on the street, but use the stock 16" wheels when you Autox or HPDE?

Would you go for some camber that is somewhere "between" the two or just opt for the 17" or 16"?

Do those numbers hold true even if you have lowered your car 1" or so?
Old 01-31-05, 05:33 PM
  #12  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
John Magnuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I use the pettit long track settings. They are nice for the track. The only complaint that I have on the street is that the car is super dartly. You really have to pay attention on the freeway and the car wants to follow any little rut.
Old 01-31-05, 06:32 PM
  #13  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by BlackRX7Turbo
I saw a huge difference in the front and rear camber between the 16" vs. 17" wheel... what if you drive 17" wheels on the street, but use the stock 16" wheels when you Autox or HPDE?

Would you go for some camber that is somewhere "between" the two or just opt for the 17" or 16"?

Do those numbers hold true even if you have lowered your car 1" or so?
I do that right now. I'm set for the 16" setting for the track (using stock rims + Victoracers) but run 17" on the street (and my car is lowered):



You'll probably get a little odd wear on your street tires, but I'm sure others could provide more information on it. For me right now, it's more important to have a correct track alignment than the street (as currently that's about all my car is used for).
Old 01-31-05, 06:36 PM
  #14  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
For me right now, it's more important to have a correct track alignment than the street (as currently that's about all my car is used for).
What's the use in having great looking street wheels if you don't get to wear them much?
Old 01-31-05, 07:34 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
BlackRX7Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
I do that right now. I'm set for the 16" setting for the track (using stock rims + Victoracers) but run 17" on the street (and my car is lowered):



You'll probably get a little odd wear on your street tires, but I'm sure others could provide more information on it. For me right now, it's more important to have a correct track alignment than the street (as currently that's about all my car is used for).
Wow -- and THAT is really lowered!!

Thanks for the input!
Old 01-31-05, 08:17 PM
  #16  
AUM
I am the Architect

 
AUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wpg, MB, Canada
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the stock street setting for the alignment? My car must be set for the track or something my car is really darty. On a nice smooth road no problems straight as an arrow. On a road with any tire ruts in it if you let go of the steering wheel even slightly it is gone.
Old 01-31-05, 09:38 PM
  #17  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by DamonB
What's the use in having great looking street wheels if you don't get to wear them much?
Not much. But they look great in the garage!

My plan is to have a "driveable" car this year so it will spend more time on the road than the jackstands. At least that's the plan.

Heck, what else could break this coming year?
Old 01-31-05, 10:39 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
FDjunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bartlesville, OK.
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's a table that you might find helpful. It shows a comparison of the factory alignment settings for the different model years of the FD along with Pettit's recommendations, and finally the settings I used for my own daily driver.

I did not to use the high negative camber settings due to tire wear considerations. But since I wanted less understeer I settled on a little more camber for the front and a little less on the rear; compared to OEM values.

My car is a '95 PEP that has been lowered about 1" in the front and 1-1/2" in the rear for a level stance, is still using stock wheels and roll bars, and has Bridgestone’s 225/50-16 RE730 tires all around @ 32PSI. I have added a shock-tower brace, adjustable shocks, Pettit’s toe-links, and I rotate the tires every 5K mikes. I've logged the last 24K miles (out of a total 94K) in this configuration.

With the indicated settings turn in became vary quick, cornering is more neutral than factory with greater adhesion, there is some minor darting behavior on heavily grooved roads, and I experience much better tire wear patterns.
Attached Files
Old 02-01-05, 07:28 AM
  #19  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik

Heck, what else could break this coming year?
You know, I tell myself that all the time and there really is always something else ready to break
Old 02-01-05, 11:38 AM
  #20  
Hi....

 
jeremyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: bay area
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Try the Pettit Long Track specs:
http://www.jimagu.com/tinou/pettit_alignment.jpg
The last time I checked my alignment specs for caster on my front wheels I had like -4.0 to -5.0. Is there a camber kit or anything to make caster positive enough to match those specs?
Old 02-01-05, 12:37 PM
  #21  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
John Magnuson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What pettit is trying to say by those caster specs is just make caster as positive as possible. On my stock ride height FD I could get around 4.5
Old 02-01-05, 01:49 PM
  #22  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
On my lowered FD, I can easily get over 7.5 deg caster and the shop had to dial it back to approximately 6 deg caster.

Also, the Pettit Long Track settings are great for all around use (in the 16" size anyway). I have been running the 16" Long Track and modified 18" specs (more camber than Pettit suggests) for 1.5 years with zero abnormal wear on the tires. In fact, the tires wear very even at the track as well.
Old 02-01-05, 09:06 PM
  #23  
Registered "User"

 
LemonR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: va
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Mahjik]I do that right now. I'm set for the 16" setting for the track (using stock rims + Victoracers) but run 17" on the street (and my car is lowered):



I have those same rims, my compliments to the chef.
Old 02-01-05, 11:32 PM
  #24  
White is tight

 
fdeeznutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tried the 18" street setting that Pettit had on their site. My car was very loose feeling on the street. When I got on the gas it felt like I was driving on my M/T streets set at 8psi. I quickly took it back to my shop and had them set it to stock specs. Do not use the 18" street specs.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
cooldude
West RX-7 Forum
5
10-03-15 09:17 PM
windom
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
4
09-11-15 04:48 AM



Quick Reply: Factory or Custom Alignment?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 PM.