3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Difference between light and re-enforced FD wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-06 | 05:21 PM
  #1  
cozmo kraemer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Darkside FD
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Difference between light and re-enforced FD wheels

I am attempting to sell a set of two FD wheels with M/T drag tires on them. One potential buyer is asking me if they are the light weight or the re-enforced version of the FD wheels.

They came off of a late build 94. Are there any markings or visual differences that I could use to decipher which version I have?
Old 05-09-06 | 05:28 PM
  #2  
Cgotto6's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 2
From: Bothell, Washington
The re inforced wheels spokes are about 2.25" wide right where they meet the rim.

The non reinforced ones are about 2" wide where it meets the rim.
Old 05-09-06 | 05:38 PM
  #3  
OkBlue_FD's Avatar
Full Member

 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Ada, Ok
how much are you wanting for them?
Old 05-09-06 | 05:49 PM
  #4  
ArcWelder's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by cozmo kraemer
I am attempting to sell a set of two FD wheels with M/T drag tires on them. One potential buyer is asking me if they are the light weight or the re-enforced version of the FD wheels.

They came off of a late build 94. Are there any markings or visual differences that I could use to decipher which version I have?
Not the best picture but the one on the right is the reinforced wheel.
Attached Thumbnails Difference between light and re-enforced FD wheels-fdwheels.jpg  
Old 05-09-06 | 07:15 PM
  #5  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 2,472
From: Pensacola, FL
I believe only the '93s had the light weight wheels - they changed that in '94 when they saw the cracking problems.

Dale
Old 05-09-06 | 07:28 PM
  #6  
cozmo kraemer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Darkside FD
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: AZ
I am wanting $250 plus shipping...but best offer so far is $250 shipped
Old 05-09-06 | 07:29 PM
  #7  
cozmo kraemer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Darkside FD
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Thank you very much for the info guys!

That is all I needed to know!!
Old 08-23-07 | 09:01 AM
  #8  
Si Speed's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Bob's Trailer Park
Originally Posted by DaleClark
I believe only the '93s had the light weight wheels - they changed that in '94 when they saw the cracking problems.

Dale

I know this is an old thread but at least I'm searching and not starting a new thread.
Does anyone have any verification that the quoted statement is 100% true? And how common is this cracking problem?
Old 08-23-07 | 10:17 AM
  #9  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,897
Likes: 297
From: Bath, OH
My FD was built in 1992 (I bought it new in March 1993) and it came with the "reinforced" wheels. After I damaged one late in 1993, the "new" replacement wheel was a "lightweight" one. I'm more inclined to think that Mazda had two interchangable sources for wheels.
Old 08-23-07 | 11:14 AM
  #10  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by DaveW
My FD was built in 1992 (I bought it new in March 1993) and it came with the "reinforced" wheels. After I damaged one late in 1993, the "new" replacement wheel was a "lightweight" one. I'm more inclined to think that Mazda had two interchangable sources for wheels.
I agree with you. I think I've seen just as many cracked "reinforced" wheels as I have the "non-reinforced" wheels over the years. IMO, it just seems like two different sources for the wheels rather than one made specifically to be stronger.
Old 08-23-07 | 11:28 AM
  #11  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,897
Likes: 297
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by DaveW
My FD was built in 1992 (I bought it new in March 1993) and it came with the "reinforced" wheels. After I damaged one late in 1993, the "new" replacement wheel was a "lightweight" one. I'm more inclined to think that Mazda had two interchangable sources for wheels.
DUH...

Geez. I was off by a year - I meant it was built in 1991, and I bought it in March 1992.
Old 08-23-07 | 11:57 AM
  #12  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 22
From: Hershey PA
Originally Posted by DaveW
My FD was built in 1992 (I bought it new in March 1993) and it came with the "reinforced" wheels. After I damaged one late in 1993, the "new" replacement wheel was a "lightweight" one. I'm more inclined to think that Mazda had two interchangable sources for wheels.
I agree with all of this, but Mazda clearly didn't consider them to be perfectly equal. That's because I've not yet seen or heard of a car coming from Mazda with mixed set.

Personally I don't think it's a very big deal - just inspect them carefully before buying and always inspect them.

Dave
Old 08-23-07 | 12:20 PM
  #13  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,897
Likes: 297
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
... but Mazda clearly didn't consider them to be perfectly equal. That's because I've not yet seen or heard of a car coming from Mazda with mixed set.

Dave
Considering that the backside appearance is quite different, that, in itself, would have caused some complaints, I'm sure, if they did mix them on any one car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
09-02-18 09:53 AM
fastsaab
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
08-19-15 11:42 AM



Quick Reply: Difference between light and re-enforced FD wheels



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.