3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

cheap stock airbox mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-04 | 06:05 PM
  #101  
azn akira's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Seoul, Korea
i installed the cheap bastard intake mod with a k&n filter and i could not be happier. the fitment was great and there was increased throttle response aswell as more power. i did a pull with a guy who has the same mods that i have (full exhaust, pfc, intake, boost controller) except he had an m2 airbox and upgraded smic. we were dead even from about 60-130 when we shut down. thanks adam c (^_^)b
Old 06-07-04 | 01:29 PM
  #102  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Thats great that your car runs so much better. If you're happy, I'm happy

I have been telling people for quite a while that the modded box is as good, or better, than the M2. Thats cool that you stayed even with him, even though he had an upgraded intercooler.

I wonder if the big square stock replacement K&N filter flows better than the two small filters that come with the M2. Does anyone have any info on that?
Old 06-20-04 | 11:30 PM
  #103  
Sonny's Avatar
R1derful
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: N Cali
Adam's intake gets a thumbs up for me. Easy install, clear instructions, noticeable gain.

Sonny
Old 06-21-04 | 12:29 PM
  #104  
novadan67's Avatar
"It's not that simple"

 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
I spent Saturday afternoon working on my FD. I installed Adam's intake, added a can of R134 to my AC, and did a full claybar/polish/wax job. Now my car is faster, cooler, and looks better!

The intake install was very easy. The most time consuming part was cutting out the hole in the bottom of the box. I took my time and filed all the edges for a nice clean opening in the bottom of the box.

Knowing that this mod had potential to raise my boost I turned it down about 1psi before testing. When I went out and tested it, I had gained back the 1psi. The spool up was reduced and there was a little increase in the top-end pull. IMO, it was well worth the few dollars and couple hours I spent on it.

Last edited by novadan67; 06-21-04 at 12:37 PM.
Old 06-21-04 | 05:13 PM
  #105  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Sonny, glad you liked the results. Please make a post after your dyno comparison. My offer is still good

Dan, You got it installed before Spurvo I hope you got to compare the two before installation. Did you notice the small differences?
Old 06-21-04 | 05:45 PM
  #106  
novadan67's Avatar
"It's not that simple"

 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Originally posted by adam c
Dan, You got it installed before Spurvo I hope you got to compare the two before installation. Did you notice the small differences?
I didn't have a chance to get a side-by-side comparison. The only difference that I noticed (from remembering what the older one looked like) was the rolled edges where it goes aroung the radiator hose. I made some small "tweaks" of my own to get it to fit to my PERFECTIONISTIC standards.
Old 06-21-04 | 06:36 PM
  #107  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
What did you do? Maybe it is something I can incorporate into future shields.
Old 06-21-04 | 09:16 PM
  #108  
novadan67's Avatar
"It's not that simple"

 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Not really much. The main thing was that I rolled the edges on "tab B" because my coolant overflow hose ran right by it and I didn't want it rubbing through. I also bent the front part of the shield toward the radiator a little so it fit a bit tighter (there was a small gap). These may be just fitment issues that I had since I have a PWR radiator which took some modifications to the brackets to get to fit. It (and its radiator hose) may not be sitting exactly where the stock radiator and hose were...
Old 06-21-04 | 09:25 PM
  #109  
spurvo's Avatar
don't race, don't need to
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 1
From: Tri-Cities, WA
yeah, Spurvo = teh slow!!!

I WILL get there. Just as SOON as my car stops dying in gear with the lights on. AND stops dropping coolant (hose issue, pretty sure. Newer hose clamps too big, not compressing older hoses with old hose clamp pattern EMBEDDED in after only six months)

end of poor excuses
Old 06-22-04 | 01:48 PM
  #110  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Dan, that sounds like a good idea on tab "b". I'll have to take a look at that. One of the main reasons that I don't "pre-bend" tab "a" is because some people have aftermarket radiators, and they don't all fit exactly the same. I'm glad it fit almost to your specs

Spurvo..........................
What can I say......................
I just hope to live long enough to see my kit installed in your car Just kidding!! I'm sure it will get done some day
Old 06-23-04 | 12:19 AM
  #111  
aTxRx7's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Talking I'm a new Cheap Bastard

Well just wanted to add my experiences to the list. I finally installed my kit after first installing a Pettit ECU. Now I have a modded cat-back, downpipe, ECU, and intake.

Here are some pics:
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/495051/4

All I can say is "WOW!" The car really feels alive now. I don't even know what to do with first gear now....

My only "concern" is now my boost goes up to around 12-12.5 psi (used to be 11). Doesn't really spike but gets there fast. I'm kinda afraid to really step on it now. Is that safe? I plan to do the home depot mod next.

Thanks adam!
Old 06-23-04 | 01:25 PM
  #112  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
You're welcome. Thanks for the nice post. Welcome to the Cheap Bastard Club

I think you are OK with your boost the way it is. That's what the Pettit ECU is made for. Keep an eye on it. If it goes much higher, I would put in the boost controller. For now, just have fun with it

The pics are nice. The ones of your car look very good. The front lip looks great.
Old 07-10-04 | 01:17 AM
  #113  
EdwardNorth's Avatar
The Light is my strength.
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Ferndale, MI
I got the cheap bastard mod a couple of days ago and finished the install. I LOVE it!! Here are a few personal observations:

- The car does indeed feel much more "alive" and "perky" now, it seems like it's always anxious to go and go fast!
- Spool-up is definately much faster.
- There is some noticable difference at WOT on the primary turbo, but when the secondary kicks in, oh man, that FD gets ANGRY.
- I have a PFC, and so I wanted to find out about intake temp differences. Well here is some data for you all - There is an average temp difference of about 5-10 degrees C cooler with the cheap bastard mod installed. I also removed the cap covering my passenger-side intake duct (where the 2nd oil cooler would get it's air from if I had one) so I don't know how much can be attributed to that (if anything at all). It takes longer for the intake temps to heat up sitting at idle and it cools down more quickly when driving than before the mod. I hope this helps anyone who was wondering about intake temps!

Other than that, a couple other observations:

- The "mooing" sound that people describe is nowhere to be found. There is a bit of a growl below 2000 rpm (especially when first starting the car), and there is a constant humming sound at idle that I couldn't hear before the mod (maybe it's the turbos) but it sounds cool!
- I can hear the activity associated with the fine inner workings of the turbo system now, including the stock BOV!! You hear a varying pitch WHOOSH from the BOV depending how much you were boosting before removing your foot from the gas pedal. It is VERY cool. I can hear the BOV clear as day.

Since a guy like me is all thumbs, I give Adam TEN thumbs up for the mod.

Now I don't have to worry about dumping cash on an aftermarket CAI until I save up for my ASP Medium IC. Thanks again, Adam!
Old 07-10-04 | 01:49 AM
  #114  
aTxRx7's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
I''m glad I'm not the only one that hears the stock BOV after this mod. I thought I was dreaming.
Old 07-11-04 | 01:14 AM
  #115  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Thanks for the nice post Ed. Thats some good info. There are a couple of others that are doing some testing with intake temps, and I hope a dyno test will be coming soon.

I'm glad you are happy with the results

Adam

BTW, I have a Blitz SMIC on my car. It fits very nicely with the stock airbox.
Old 08-04-04 | 08:00 PM
  #116  
BATMAN's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley Bay Area
Originally Posted by maxpesce
Does it look alot like the one I have posted on my web site?
http://home.earthlink.net/~maxpesce/index.html
and used to be in the Forum Galleries when they were working.
If so then I think I may deserve a small piece of that sales action!


Don't u think that all of these grids would cause turbulence and have an adverse effect on intake velocities and CFMs?



The duct is a good idea, but the duct is ribbed and may contribute to undue turbulence as well.

How about just pulling in air from the bottom like M2's design?

YES YES YES, I realize that this is an old thread.

I was just bored and surfing.
Old 08-08-04 | 03:17 PM
  #117  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Batman,

James Paventi tried the modded box with the multiple small holes. He was concerned about the structural integrity of the box. We talked about it, and decided that the box was very sturdy, and the ridges were not necessary. He cut out the ridges, and felt a gain in performance. So, you are right, it is better with one large opening.

I wanted a clean design/install for my mod, so I didn't do any ducting.
Old 08-19-04 | 03:53 PM
  #118  
efiniste's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, England
Well, finally got to performance test this mod after tracking down a REALLY annoying boost leak. First off, intake temps are down according to the PFC Commander by a couple of degrees at least (even more on a run).
I tried the mod with the original intake both covered and uncovered. There wasn't much difference in temps but it definitely feels livelier with the original intake open too.
I love the noise of the stock BOV too. Much more subtle than the stupidly loud aftermarket ones and so infinitely cooler!
The car now pulls like a train too. Boost comes on harder and faster than it did previously.
All in all I'm happy to recommend this mod to anyone. It's so much better than spending a few hundred pounds on something that will just suck hot air into your engine.
thanks again Adam for a first class product.

Steve
Old 08-20-04 | 12:25 AM
  #119  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by efiniste
Well, finally got to performance test this mod after tracking down a REALLY annoying boost leak. First off, intake temps are down according to the PFC Commander by a couple of degrees at least (even more on a run).
I tried the mod with the original intake both covered and uncovered. There wasn't much difference in temps but it definitely feels livelier with the original intake open too.
I love the noise of the stock BOV too. Much more subtle than the stupidly loud aftermarket ones and so infinitely cooler!
The car now pulls like a train too. Boost comes on harder and faster than it did previously.
All in all I'm happy to recommend this mod to anyone. It's so much better than spending a few hundred pounds on something that will just suck hot air into your engine.
thanks again Adam for a first class product.

Steve
Hi Steve,

Thanks for sharing your results. I believe that you are the first person to do a comparison with the stock intake tubing connected, and then blocked off. I have always advised people to retain the stock intake, as it provides a second source of cool air. A few people decided to block it off. Its nice to know that it is worth keeping. If you can feel the difference, that is significant. Glad to hear that your car is running good, and thanks again for posting

Adam
Old 08-20-04 | 11:56 AM
  #120  
novadan67's Avatar
"It's not that simple"

 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Originally Posted by adam c
Hi Steve,

Thanks for sharing your results. I believe that you are the first person to do a comparison with the stock intake tubing connected, and then blocked off. I have always advised people to retain the stock intake, as it provides a second source of cool air. A few people decided to block it off. Its nice to know that it is worth keeping. If you can feel the difference, that is significant. Glad to hear that your car is running good, and thanks again for posting

Adam
Hey Adam,

Do you know if anybody has tried using the Racing Beat duct in combination with your intake? I was just wondering since it is essentially the same as the stock duct but with a lot better flow. Eventually you will get to a point where the lowered restriction will not benefit you anymore, but I am not sure that is reached with the hole in the bottom plus the stock duct. Anyway, just a thought...

-Dan
Old 08-20-04 | 02:03 PM
  #121  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Hi Dan,

I hate the RB duct.

It's a pain in the ***, especially when you want to remove the airbox ....... which you have to do virtually every time you do anything to the car. With my mod, and the stock intake, you have a very free flowing cold air intake. With my mod, there isn't anything extra attached to the box, that gets in the way when removing it. If you want more air, condsider enlarging the opening on the bottom of the box. When doing this, be sure that you do not open it in a manner that will allow any hot air to come in. I opened mine a little more than my instructions call for, but not much.

Adam
Old 09-08-04 | 10:59 PM
  #122  
ManGaZeRo's Avatar
Living the Dream
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: Temple city, CA
When cutting the hole on the box are you suppose to leave the grids? You still put back on the intake and intercooler duct right?
Old 09-09-04 | 02:07 PM
  #123  
spurvo's Avatar
don't race, don't need to
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 1
From: Tri-Cities, WA
So I finally got the hell around to doing all this, been running it for about two months. To start, I left the support bracing (i.e. the "grids") in place and only cleared the holes. I removed the cross-box that feeds air from the IC duct to the front of the intake box, and sealed the IC duct and intake snorkle with race tape. Initial impressions were that the intake temps as measured right in front of the primary turbo inlet using a thermocouple and Fluke meter showed roughly the same temps as were found before the mod during regular cruising, as well as the same temperature rises when the fans were turned on to cool the engine. HOWEVER, the temp drop when going from a stoplight with the fans on to regular cruising was much quicker, and the temps actually dropped, rather than simply ratcheting higher as one drives, as was the case with the stock set up. What really was nce to see was the drop in temps at the intake elbow, again via thermocouple and Fluke meter, plumbed into the AWS intake pipe. Here, the temps were found to run ~5 C cooler on average, but the real nice thing was how quickly the intake temps get back down from any rise they incur, either through turbo usage or fans blowing on stock IC. This is of course due to the fact that the air duct is now forcing all the air through the IC, with none slipping by into the intake. Note also that I've removed the battery from the engine bay and blocked off the cooling duct for that as well. So all air goes through the IC.

I still see intake temps running between 25-30C on the freeway, with jumps to 45-50 with turbo usage. But they drop RIGHT back down again as soon as the heat load is removed. Driving with the fans on (really not needed on the freeway, just wanted to see...) gives ~35C or so, no real shift from normal cruising. Sitting and idling with the fans on still raises the intake temps to ~55C or so after a while, but they will cool down to the 35C or so when driving again. It now only requires a sustained 35mph or so to get this to happen, whereas it needed 40-45 mph before.

So I had to tear the turbos off due to doolant leak on the coolant return line (note to 'yall: replace the sealing copper washers EVERY time you loosen a banjo connection. They will NOT reseal with the old washer...), and decided to take adams advice and pull the bracing. It wasn't doing much anyway (box is **** for strong!).

I will tell you there is a MAJOR difference between leaving the bracings in and removing them. Whether this is turbulence related or just raw cross sectional intake area, there is DEFINATELY more power and faster spool with them removed.

So. Pull the grids, remove the cross pipe, and seal the IC duct and intake snorkle. I will also mention that I am running NO restrictions in my WG and TPCT lines (i.e. pills removed, though mine were actually restrictors drilled). I get 8.5psi on the primary to 4500, then 9psi to ~6000, then a slight fall off. Plenty for Seattle area traffic and COPS (thick these days...), and I can delay that turbo rebuild for a while longer...

Good product, and mine is especially good as it still retains the "inspected by" sticker.. a real "kick"
Old 09-13-04 | 01:41 PM
  #124  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Hi Spurvo,

Thats really good info. Thanks for taking the time to do all of that. It s good to know that the intake temps dropped with the mod, and the ducting removed. "Efinitse" checked some intake temps with, and without, the stock ducting connected. He didn't see much difference in temps, but did notice a performance gain with the mod, and the stock ducting in place. I was wondering if you would be willing to do your test with the ducting

My thought is that my mod allows the engine to pull most of its air thru the "new" opening in the airbox, and that the stock ducting is like a secondary supply. When the car is moving at over 40 mph, there is a pretty good amount of cool air that is coming thru the nose of the car, and being forced into the intake. It seems like that would be a good secondary supply of cool intake air.

What do you think?
Old 09-13-04 | 01:46 PM
  #125  
cool_koo's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
cheap is good =)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 PM.