Boost gauge accuracy?
#26
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you have any words of wisdom on this particular brand
The problem with digital displays is that they really don't give you a sense of scale. A quick glance at an analog gauge and you know if you are OK, without knowing the exact value. With a digital number, you have to put it into perspective yourself.
Hmm...I tested the accuracy of my boost gauge by comparing it to the ECU (PFC readout), which I would HOPE is the most accurate? Any thoughts?
P.S. Can't remember how to get the "Originally Posted by" in there. Any hints?
#28
I'm asking myself just how critical it is that the guage is exact. At least on my car with a stock ECU. Since that stock ECU tends to be on the rich side anyway, and since relatively speaking, my boost is held at a given psi, and if the pattern is as Mazda intended it be (a relative 10-8-10) .....do I need to be all that concerned?
Regardless, it was an interesting read ReadyKW. Thanks.
Regardless, it was an interesting read ReadyKW. Thanks.
#30
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
I'm asking myself just how critical it is that the guage is exact. At least on my car with a stock ECU. Since that stock ECU tends to be on the rich side anyway, and since relatively speaking, my boost is held at a given psi, and if the pattern is as Mazda intended it be (a relative 10-8-10) .....do I need to be all that concerned?
Regardless, it was an interesting read ReadyKW. Thanks.
Regardless, it was an interesting read ReadyKW. Thanks.
#34
Originally Posted by olyrx7
So now I'm confused, If I read correctly any gauge can be off. So an autometer or greddy or defi are on the same level?
#35
Full Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Something else to consider is the responce time of analog versus digital gauges.
I'm using a VDO 0 - 15 PSI boost gauge that has a 270 degree sweep. This makes reading it very easy and gives it really nice "resolution". I use the term resolution losely since anything analog/mechanical has pretty much infinite reolution. This is more in reference to the human perception.
I also use a Greddy Profec B to control boost, which has a built in gauge and peak/hold feature.
The two compared to each other at a static pressure are equal (yes, I've tested it with a Mityvac). Yet during operation the peak shown by the Greddy BC will always show a small spike of about 0.7 to 1.0 PSI (driving me nuts, cause I can't seem to get rid of it...). While the mechanical nature of the VDO gauge lags behind just enough to make any spike nearly imperceptible, at most registering .2 - .3 if anything at all.
This makes using an analog gauge to tune the boost pressure without the backup of a good peak/hold feature rather dangerous. Especially if one insists of running near the very ragged edge of the fuel systm.
Just my $0.02.
I'm using a VDO 0 - 15 PSI boost gauge that has a 270 degree sweep. This makes reading it very easy and gives it really nice "resolution". I use the term resolution losely since anything analog/mechanical has pretty much infinite reolution. This is more in reference to the human perception.
I also use a Greddy Profec B to control boost, which has a built in gauge and peak/hold feature.
The two compared to each other at a static pressure are equal (yes, I've tested it with a Mityvac). Yet during operation the peak shown by the Greddy BC will always show a small spike of about 0.7 to 1.0 PSI (driving me nuts, cause I can't seem to get rid of it...). While the mechanical nature of the VDO gauge lags behind just enough to make any spike nearly imperceptible, at most registering .2 - .3 if anything at all.
This makes using an analog gauge to tune the boost pressure without the backup of a good peak/hold feature rather dangerous. Especially if one insists of running near the very ragged edge of the fuel systm.
Just my $0.02.
#36
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by DaleClark
That's a little harsh, Damon.
You felt the Greddy was more expensive, was prettier, had better lighting, smaller sensors, nicer hardware etc. With that info to then make the jump that it is more accurate is completely unfounded by the facts given in the write up.
Last edited by DamonB; 03-06-06 at 08:27 AM.
#37
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by ReadyKW
A change in atmospheric pressure will not affect your boost gauge. All presssure measuring instruments actually measure differential pressure.
We wanted to know if the gauges displayed differential pressure or absolute pressure so we put them into a little vacuum chamber rigged from a plastic box and an air compressor. If the gauge reads differential pressure its needle shouldn't move. If it reads absolute pressure the gauge should read the pressure inside the chamber. Results were mixed but perhaps we overlooked another variable?
#38
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by DaleClark
Autometer gauges are all over the zero "box".
Last edited by DamonB; 03-06-06 at 08:24 AM.
#39
Lives on the Forum
We use boost gauges to measure manifold pressure. What we really need to know IMO is what manifold pressure the ECU is reading because that is what fuel is based from. If people are going to gripe about tiny psi differences in gauges you sure as hell had better have your boost gauges tee'd into the MAP sensor line since this is the location from which the ecu reads boost. If you have the gauge tapped anywhere else you will see slight differences (less than a psi I'm sure) in manifold pressure because of flow differences throughout the manifold itself.
#40
Originally Posted by DamonB
We use boost gauges to measure manifold pressure. What we really need to know IMO is what manifold pressure the ECU is reading because that is what fuel is based from........
I guess I bought my gauge assuming it was accurate and responsive, but also with asthetics in mind. I would prefer to keep it unless it's really a liability.
#41
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (14)
Originally Posted by DamonB
We use boost gauges to measure manifold pressure. What we really need to know IMO is what manifold pressure the ECU is reading because that is what fuel is based from. If people are going to gripe about tiny psi differences in gauges you sure as hell had better have your boost gauges tee'd into the MAP sensor line since this is the location from which the ecu reads boost. If you have the gauge tapped anywhere else you will see slight differences (less than a psi I'm sure) in manifold pressure because of flow differences throughout the manifold itself.
#42
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (14)
The perfect zero is also a result of the electronic age greedy, defi (elec), Autometer (full sweep electric) all reset the zero at ignition turn on. The Autometer take manifold reading as the "key" sweeps between on and start. The world has many gauges, we could spend 5 grand on a boost gauge if we wished. As far as our application their are a number of factors, price, reliability, accuracy, readability, looks, interior match, lighting, features. To each his own I use big Autometer mech. ProComp Ultralight gauges on my race car; they are easy to read, I do not race at night, they stand up to the vibrations, they are well made (Autometer has a million product lines, and even with same name model x and y can be different ie, all aluminum case in 2 5/8 gauge vs plastic in 52 mm gauge) and mech. senders down tax electrics. On my FD I use full sweep elec. 52 mm, so as to get memory, easier installation blah blah blah. I guess to keep the car Japanese, I should have just taped 100,000 yen notes to the dash and asked my passengers: hey like my Japan gauge, the corners curl when the boost go's past 17 psi, but its ok, those six notes will get me a new engine.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lexington, IL
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While we're on the topic of autometer, and if you want I'll move this to it's own thread, I find that the gauge's tendancy to zero out at 1 psi boost is dependent on sunlight or lack thereof, striking my a-pilar cluster. On a cold day, no sun, it tends to zero at 1 psi boost. It also tends to under-report vacuum by 3-4 mm Hg. When it was new it zeroed out at 0 and all numbers were idle = 18 mm Hg and top boost was at 10 PSI, set by a Greddy Profec B. Today, it is cold out and the gauge zeros at 1 PSI, it reports idle vacuum at 15 mm Hg and top boost at 11 PSI. When it is warm out yesterday and the cluster is hot to the touch, the gauge zeros out and reports readings like it did when it was new. The tendancy to zero out at different PSI under different temperatures is definitely influencing top readings in boost and vacuum, consistently. Do a Google search of "Autometer boost gauge" and zero and the results are interesting if you have all night to read about the same problems on Mitsus, Mercs, Nissans and Toyotas. And, by the way, anyone know a way to calibrate an Autometer Carbon Fiber Ultralite? There's no set screws on it anywhere that I can find. I suspect I too will be looking for another gauge when I can afford it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
09-05-15 08:57 PM