3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

BNR 400+ HP Twins from RX-7 Store?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-03, 06:06 PM
  #401  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by fdracer


well you never mentioned this was a dynojet. i just assumed this was on the old dyno, since you've got similar numbers from before, which you said equated to 15% less on a dynojet.
Hey man, I'm sorry I got kinda snappy with you. People started getting kinda pushy and by the time I got down there to your post I was kinda ill. Anyway, I just posed the new Dynojet numbers over on the other thread so you can check them out now. These arent as high as the other place but they are still good and the hp curve between the shift points is awsome. I dont know what to think about the other results I got, but I feel like this new Dynojet sheet probably best reflects my car.

STEPHEN

Last edited by SPOautos; 01-15-03 at 06:08 PM.
Old 01-15-03, 06:16 PM
  #402  
Speed Mach Go Go Go

iTrader: (2)
 
GoRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by SPOautos
FOR ALL THAT ARE INTERESTED THE CHART ARE ON THIS THREAD.......

https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...3&pagenumber=2

If someone wants to post it over onto this one be my guest. I'm not sure how to make it show up as a picture.

Thanks,
STEPHEN

Old 01-15-03, 06:20 PM
  #403  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
kwikrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Way to shut up the BS people, Stephen 412 rwhp is awesome on twins! Let's keep the dyno numbers coming!
Old 01-15-03, 06:35 PM
  #404  
Senior Member

 
capt. bill1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sarasota FL/Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great numbers! It's about time we had a documented 400+ RWHP on twins.

Whose M2 setup are you comparing too? And if the M2 was sequental where's the dip at cross over?
Old 01-15-03, 07:25 PM
  #405  
Rotary Freak

 
paw140's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why does the torque level off abruptly at 4700 rpm? Is that where you get full boost?
Old 01-15-03, 07:40 PM
  #406  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey bill...that chart belongs to greg...its the same one i posted a while back in comparison to the rx6 on max coopers car.

he has very little transition drop...a smoothly running machine....I am positive he is seq though...ive seen the car with my own eyes.
Old 01-15-03, 09:22 PM
  #407  
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: ArmyTenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,571
Received 554 Likes on 335 Posts
Originally posted by kwikrx7
Way to shut up the BS people, Stephen 412 rwhp is awesome on twins! Let's keep the dyno numbers coming!
I'm hoping to beat that......we should find out on monday *fingers crossed*

My motor/turbos have 360 miles on them and counting....
Old 01-15-03, 09:39 PM
  #408  
NorCal 7's Co-founder

 
BoostedRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Very nice to see the sheets, thanx Stephen! Also good to see the proof for my own eyes. I was catching all kinds of flack from the local guys about these twins. I've just printed out the chart and will be heading to the shop in town tomorrow afternoon. Congrats bro. Laterz.

Zach
Old 01-15-03, 11:11 PM
  #409  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too was totally blown away by the numbers that the bnr turbo setup is producing. But I walked into Rotary Performance yesterday to get some questions answered about the rebuild that I am about to undergo. I asked rotary what they felt about the bnr turbos and they are impressed with them but the ones that they know of being put on the dyno are and i dont know how to explain this but they are not dynos that measure hp at the wheels they are another kind of dyno that measures it differently I wish i could remember but im stupid and have a bad memory. But they do want to dyno a set to see what they will produce but they still swear by the t78 and i am just wishing that they would put out a ball bearing t78 until then I feel that i am going with the gt35/40. who knows that is still a ways off for me at least 6-8 months but call up rotary performance and talk to them. but that is just me and i dont know much but please do research on them or call up rotary. they do know what they are talking about.
Old 01-16-03, 10:24 AM
  #410  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by paw140
Why does the torque level off abruptly at 4700 rpm? Is that where you get full boost?
Well, I was talking to Steve about that and he mentioned it looked like a small boost spike. After thinking about it I remembered on my way home I did have about a 1psi spike at peak boost. My boost stoped building at like 19 at 4700 then instantly droped down to 17-18 like it was set for. Steve thinks this is why the tq curve make a sharp angle right there instead of curving around like it normally would do.

STEPHEN
Old 01-16-03, 10:26 AM
  #411  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also guys, I still have more safe hp in my tuning. I should be able to get more peak hp as well as a lot more low end hp. I'm running really rich and loading up with fuel till about 3000-4000rpms. One I pull that out they will spool up and build hp even faster.

STEPHEN
Old 01-16-03, 10:44 AM
  #412  
fart on a friends head!!!

 
rotorbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: sheppard AFB, TX
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Sparkey
I too was totally blown away by the numbers that the bnr turbo setup is producing. But I walked into Rotary Performance yesterday to get some questions answered about the rebuild that I am about to undergo. I asked rotary what they felt about the bnr turbos and they are impressed with them but the ones that they know of being put on the dyno are and i dont know how to explain this but they are not dynos that measure hp at the wheels they are another kind of dyno that measures it differently I wish i could remember but im stupid and have a bad memory. But they do want to dyno a set to see what they will produce but they still swear by the t78 and i am just wishing that they would put out a ball bearing t78 until then I feel that i am going with the gt35/40. who knows that is still a ways off for me at least 6-8 months but call up rotary performance and talk to them. but that is just me and i dont know much but please do research on them or call up rotary. they do know what they are talking about.

butt-dyno speaks a lot for these turbos. they are faster than any twin i have ever witnessed.

paul
Old 01-16-03, 11:38 AM
  #413  
Newb Photog

 
wptrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: new jersey
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how many psi was that dyno sheet on top set for?

luigi
Old 01-16-03, 11:47 AM
  #414  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by wptrx7
how many psi was that dyno sheet on top set for?

luigi
1.14 on the PFC
Old 01-16-03, 02:12 PM
  #415  
jr
Senior Member

 
jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The PFC reads in kilograms of force per square centimeter. 1.14 kgf/square cm = 16.214612 lbf/square inch (PSI).

It has also been observed that the PFC's boost readings can be off depending on conditions. Sometimes it's dead on and sometimes it can be off by as much as 2 PSI on the low side. So 16-18 PSI is the range you were at. Didn't you say you saw 17 PSI on your boost gauge?

Last edited by jr; 01-16-03 at 02:19 PM.
Old 01-16-03, 02:42 PM
  #416  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
BATMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Silicon Valley Bay Area
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the 17psi is the limit of the PFC without that "whachamacallit" gadget......
Old 01-16-03, 03:05 PM
  #417  
Racing is Life.....

 
Beast From The East's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1.15 = top reading with stock 2bar map sensor

I've confirmed this using a mightyvac on the map sensor. 1.15 *14.22 kg/cm^2= 16.353 psi max reading for the PFC.

Of course, you can go over that in boost, but the PFC won't recognize you're going over that .....

The 3-bar map sensor allows you to go another bar on top of that (30 psi). You'll need the dataloggit to rescale the p side of the 20x20 map if you want to go over 1.4 kg/cm^2 (19.9 psi). Race gas, big injectors, pump(s), big lines, etc. all needed when you decide to go play in that arena (Ari, Steve K, and the other super studs of RX7dom).

Mine is here, but I still have not installed it.

Beast
Old 01-16-03, 03:16 PM
  #418  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jr
The PFC reads in kilograms of force per square centimeter. 1.14 kgf/square cm = 16.214612 lbf/square inch (PSI).

It has also been observed that the PFC's boost readings can be off depending on conditions. Sometimes it's dead on and sometimes it can be off by as much as 2 PSI on the low side. So 16-18 PSI is the range you were at. Didn't you say you saw 17 PSI on your boost gauge?

Yea, the Power FC wont display any higher than 1.15 without the upgraded map sensor SO, I turn it down just barely below that. The reason is if its showing 1.15 it could be 1.15 or 1.75 and you cant tell with the stock map sensor. I ran into that already lol

Anyway, yes my PFC is showing 1.14 which is 16.22 (as mentioned above). My gauge was showing 17-18 just depending on which side of the needle you go by.

STEPHEN
Old 01-16-03, 03:34 PM
  #419  
Rotary Freak

 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: l.a.
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
**** i hate running back and forth btwn the 2 bnr threads. stephen what's your fuel system consist of? how big are your ports?
Old 01-16-03, 03:53 PM
  #420  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, my fuel system is 850 primary and 1200 secondary with a Walbro pump.

As for the intake ports, I'm not really sure how much he takes off, its Brians (BNR) standard streetport but I have no idea how it compares to other companies street ports. My exhaust porting is pretty mild.

STEPHEN
Old 01-16-03, 05:04 PM
  #421  
Rotary Freak

 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: l.a.
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do the bnr turbos help prevent the small cracks in the manifold that's so common w/ the stock twins.
Old 01-16-03, 05:07 PM
  #422  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
BATMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Silicon Valley Bay Area
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do ur ports make ur idle rough? any signs of overlap?
Old 01-16-03, 06:17 PM
  #423  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, well no one has had them long enough to test about the cracks. Just as a guess I think that is from exhaust heat rather than turbo heat. The exhaust heat will remain so I dont think it'll help....could be way off though.

My idle is rough right now but its from tuning not porting. Once I get my tuning right at idle I'll let you know what it sounds like

STEPHEN
Old 01-17-03, 08:40 PM
  #424  
Indifferent

iTrader: (3)
 
Jodeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jr,
394@17-18, stock. You know what I am referring to.............
J
Old 01-20-03, 12:30 AM
  #425  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For anyone that pulls up this thread trying to do research, I traped 125 in the 1/4 and 98 in the 1/8 which driving like I was just pulling away from a red light haha, I drug it out of the hole really slow due to me still having the stock rear end.

That was with a totally full tank of fuel, sub, spare wheel/jack, ect ect ect. With all that gone and actually launching my car I should pick up another 2-3mph. In addition I think I still have around another safe 20rwhp in tuning. All this togather is going to place me into the high 120's which is enough to run well into the 10's!!!!

Here is the link to the thread about the trip to the drag strip....
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...5&pagenumber=1
STEPHEN

Last edited by SPOautos; 01-20-03 at 12:35 AM.


Quick Reply: BNR 400+ HP Twins from RX-7 Store?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.