3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Attention '95 owners (the last US FD)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-08, 02:08 PM
  #26  
Moderator
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 31,145
Received 2,799 Likes on 1,981 Posts
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
I agree 100% Gordon..... though, (to add) I believe the main cause of the "down fall" of the FD in the states was, incompetence and ignorance on the part of dealerships nation wide. Proper education and training was never accomplished thoroughly on the part of mazda/ford international.

-J
that is why we have the rx8 now.

although to be fair, if you didnt live in an area where FD's sold, do you expect a truck mechanic to fix the turbo system on a car he's only seen a pitcher of once?

those are the kind of tech who can find a vacuum leak on a chevy, but cant on a rotary.
Old 08-02-08, 03:28 PM
  #27  
Boost

Thread Starter
 
Torque South's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point. Lord knows I ain't no rocket scientist either.
Old 08-02-08, 05:37 PM
  #28  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
JM1FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gmonsen
Anyone know how to post a video? I sure don't.
I would suggest that you upload it to YouTube then post a link to it here.
Old 08-02-08, 06:36 PM
  #29  
Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
seven lust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: tenn
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I remember right mine was a silver 95 r2 and was titled in may of 96, or around there. I think it had a number of 455 but I could be off , as it has been awhile.
Old 08-02-08, 08:07 PM
  #30  
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
SLOASFK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Gordon, you can e-mail the video to me and I can upload it to my youtube account.

PM me and I'll send you my e-mail address

-B
Old 08-03-08, 08:00 PM
  #31  
reliable performance

 
JConn2299's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Julian

And by fear of read outs .. I too ment the car would need modifying at $$$. Many n/a cars went over to OBDII for just a few dollars cost of the system vs. going back to the drawing borad and developing the Renesis engine.



The car easily met the emission standards of the time. Massachusetts has the same standards as California and my car came in well under the limits at the smog test station.

The cost involved was putting in the OBD II system itself. One published report said it would have cost Mazda 5 million dollars to develop the software programming and the minor amount of hardware needed to put an OBD II system in the FD. That's not a big deal when you're selling 25,000 626's. But with only 500 '95 RX-7's selling slowly it added quite a bit to the cost.

Still, manufacturers are often willing to take losses on cars that are image leaders. When Ford took over Mazda one executive was quoted as saying they lost money on the 3rd Gen. And Ford reportedly lost money on every Ford GT sold.
But they figured the image building for the brand was worth it.
Old 08-03-08, 10:08 PM
  #32  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by JConn2299
The car easily met the emission standards of the time. Massachusetts has the same standards as California and my car came in well under the limits at the smog test station.
I never claimed that the car didn't meet the emission standards of the time. Mazda meet and exceeded the full letter of the law, just as did all the other turbo cars of the time. Just that OBDII had the capability of giving the government access to the real driving conditions; for which the car manufacturer could be held accountable.Very few if any turbo cars of the day would meet the emission standards under a boost condition.
Old 08-04-08, 02:18 PM
  #33  
Completely Rotarded

iTrader: (10)
 
Enthalpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 224
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
12/95 white PEP
Old 08-04-08, 04:48 PM
  #34  
Moderator
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 31,145
Received 2,799 Likes on 1,981 Posts
Originally Posted by JConn2299
.

Still, manufacturers are often willing to take losses on cars that are image leaders. When Ford took over Mazda one executive was quoted as saying they lost money on the 3rd Gen. And Ford reportedly lost money on every Ford GT sold.
But they figured the image building for the brand was worth it.
i bet in 1995 they had lost money, but i wonder if it balanced out by now? they have sold a lot of parts...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RX7-RR
Introduce yourself
8
06-10-18 11:40 AM
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
11-04-15 04:42 PM



Quick Reply: Attention '95 owners (the last US FD)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.