Any dynos of autos out there?
08-23-04, 09:32 PM
#26
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: colorado
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm.well I dont have a wing on mine. I removed the fog lights.
I took the bose out.Im going to remove the cruise controll.So that should be lighter than the 2923.Im constantly looking for ways to reduce weight.
Oh yeah I also dont have the stock precat anymore and also the stock catback is also gone.I wonder how much poundage I shed so far
I took the bose out.Im going to remove the cruise controll.So that should be lighter than the 2923.Im constantly looking for ways to reduce weight.
Oh yeah I also dont have the stock precat anymore and also the stock catback is also gone.I wonder how much poundage I shed so far
08-23-04, 09:42 PM
#27
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by speeddemon7
I wonder how much poundage I shed so far
Here's a friend's weight sheet for his '94 R2. Non-sequential, full exhaust, ASP medium intercooler, etc.
08-23-04, 10:15 PM
#28
il Cosa Nostra e vivo!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dove le cose sono fatte il vecchio moda il senso
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimlab
That's news to me. Where did you see this?
I'll look for it tomorrow, scan and post the page.
08-24-04, 01:47 AM
#30
Seattle Seven
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: U District, Seattle
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speeddemon7
I wonder which car would beat the other if say you had a 5 speed with the 4.1 gear and an auto with the 4.3 gears.Provided both cars were stock and running the same.
08-24-04, 06:16 AM
#31
Constant threat
I've weighed my FD several times at the local scales. It always comes in between 2890 and 2910 lbs. Base model, this was weighed after the downpipe was removed by the way.
Jimlab....you ALWAYS have some great data!
Jimlab....you ALWAYS have some great data!
08-24-04, 08:09 AM
#32
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi guys... Just out of curiosity, I am more intrested in finding out how much HP can the standard auto tranny take before it goes KABOOMM!!! and is there any upgrades to be done to the auto tranny for it to handle bigger HP? As we all know the standard manual tranny can only handle so much HP before it becomes useless and there are tons of different after market clutches out there for you to choose from. If the auto can handle significantly higher HP wht not. (For none race application 
)
)
Last edited by aja; 08-24-04 at 08:12 AM.
08-24-04, 09:17 AM
#33
il Cosa Nostra e vivo!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dove le cose sono fatte il vecchio moda il senso
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's the page that seems to indicate identical 0-60 and 1/4 mile e.t. for the MT and AT FD. The left column represents MT FD data. When the AT FD data is identical to the MT FD data, a small arrow on the right column (AT FD data) will be pointed towards the MT FD data. (I just confused myself)....
)....
Last edited by areXseven; 08-24-04 at 09:20 AM.
08-24-04, 09:44 AM
#35
Seattle Seven
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: U District, Seattle
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by areXseven
Here's the page that seems to indicate identical 0-60 and 1/4 mile e.t. for the MT and AT FD. The left column represents MT FD data. When the AT FD data is identical to the MT FD data, a small arrow on the right column (AT FD data) will be pointed towards the MT FD data. (I just confused myself)....
)....
08-24-04, 10:06 AM
#37
Meesta
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno sheet- torque- 255 max
http://upload.thiendinh.com/psi/FD0050.jpg
Dyno sheet- hp- 294.2 max, at the wheels.
http://upload.thiendinh.com/psi/FD0050.jpg
Dyno sheet- hp- 294.2 max, at the wheels.
08-24-04, 10:15 AM
#39
il Cosa Nostra e vivo!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dove le cose sono fatte il vecchio moda il senso
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speeddemon7
hmmm.the book says one thing but real life says another.things that make you go hmmmm.
08-24-04, 10:23 AM
#42
il Cosa Nostra e vivo!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dove le cose sono fatte il vecchio moda il senso
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1stGenT2
not sure this chart's going to display, but it shows 294.2 SAE horsepower
08-24-04, 10:30 AM
#43
Meesta
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mods
FD touring, manual xmsn, sequential stock turbos.
Mods:
Apex PowerFC + Commander*, tuned to 15psi (stock =10psi)
Mild Street Port
M2 Carbon Fiber Intake
M2 Down pipe
High Flow Catalytic Converter
RSR Racing exhaust (Cat-back)
PFS Stock Mount Intercooler (MUCH larger than stock, can email pics)
Toyota Supra Fuel Pump
550cc primary injectors, 1300 secondary injectors
XS Engineering Ignition Amplifier
Koyo Aluminum Radiator
Mods:
Apex PowerFC + Commander*, tuned to 15psi (stock =10psi)
Mild Street Port
M2 Carbon Fiber Intake
M2 Down pipe
High Flow Catalytic Converter
RSR Racing exhaust (Cat-back)
PFS Stock Mount Intercooler (MUCH larger than stock, can email pics)
Toyota Supra Fuel Pump
550cc primary injectors, 1300 secondary injectors
XS Engineering Ignition Amplifier
Koyo Aluminum Radiator
08-24-04, 11:09 AM
#50
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by areXseven
Here's the page that seems to indicate identical 0-60 and 1/4 mile e.t. for the MT and AT FD. The left column represents MT FD data. When the AT FD data is identical to the MT FD data, a small arrow on the right column (AT FD data) will be pointed towards the MT FD data. (I just confused myself)....
)....
Seriously, I'd be very surprised if those figures were for U.S. production cars, and we do know unequivocally that the automatics are considerably slower than the manuals.