Anti Detonation Info - I hope this is a joke
#76
well when you rebuild your motor why not just weld up the hole with aluminum and than smooth it all back out...... wouldn't that be the easiest and cheapest thing? just wait till your motor blows and have it rebuilt....
#77
Originally posted by BATMAN
yeah, really.
They don't even know SKip's personally and his personal life and they are lynching him.
yeah, really.
They don't even know SKip's personally and his personal life and they are lynching him.
Batman, do you have some sort of interest in this product?? I mean based on your responses in all of these "anti-detonation device" posts (constantly defending it), I'm sure you must have some sort of interest, so what is it??
#78
Originally posted by jimlab
Sort of makes you wonder why Mazda didn't figure this out, doesn't it?
Sort of makes you wonder why Mazda didn't figure this out, doesn't it?
Good thing that u mentioned this.
I think Mazda knew about the elimination of the trailing plug and it's advantages, but they had the trailing plug to help complete the combustion process.
The result is a cleaner exhaust.
#80
Originally posted by Pg-Unlimited
I had my car on the dyno about a week ago and put down 315HP and 280FT at about 8~10 psi. This was done on 89 Octane pump gas and running 12.5:1 A/F ratio.
Thanks.
I had my car on the dyno about a week ago and put down 315HP and 280FT at about 8~10 psi. This was done on 89 Octane pump gas and running 12.5:1 A/F ratio.
Thanks.
#81
Originally posted by nickpapagiorgio
....Batman, do you have some sort of interest in this product?? I mean based on your responses in all of these "anti-detonation device" posts (constantly defending it), I'm sure you must have some sort of interest, so what is it??
....Batman, do you have some sort of interest in this product?? I mean based on your responses in all of these "anti-detonation device" posts (constantly defending it), I'm sure you must have some sort of interest, so what is it??
There are reasons to go both ways.
Some folks want to call BS on it.
That's fine with me.
I elected to think that this would work based on what one of the guys that I knew that disconnected trailing plug on stock ECU and fuel system and ran 15psi all day long.
He did that for the 2 years that I knew him before he sold his FD for a 4 seater.
From this example, there is every reason in the world why I (and others) would think that this makes sense.
Unless there is something else to the trailing plug that I don't know about, it's existence is merely for emissions purpose, not performance.
Is this reason suffice?
#83
Originally posted by BATMAN
Jim,
Good thing that u mentioned this.
I think Mazda knew about the elimination of the trailing plug and it's advantages, but they had the trailing plug to help complete the combustion process.
The result is a cleaner exhaust.
Jim,
Good thing that u mentioned this.
I think Mazda knew about the elimination of the trailing plug and it's advantages, but they had the trailing plug to help complete the combustion process.
The result is a cleaner exhaust.
#84
Originally posted by BATMAN
Why wouldn't I defend it?
There are reasons to go both ways.
Some folks want to call BS on it.
That's fine with me.
I elected to think that this would work based on what one of the guys that I knew that disconnected trailing plug on stock ECU and fuel system and ran 15psi all day long.
He did that for the 2 years that I knew him before he sold his FD for a 4 seater.
From this example, there is every reason in the world why I (and others) would think that this makes sense.
Unless there is something else to the trailing plug that I don't know about, it's existence is merely for emissions purpose, not performance.
Is this reason suffice?
Why wouldn't I defend it?
There are reasons to go both ways.
Some folks want to call BS on it.
That's fine with me.
I elected to think that this would work based on what one of the guys that I knew that disconnected trailing plug on stock ECU and fuel system and ran 15psi all day long.
He did that for the 2 years that I knew him before he sold his FD for a 4 seater.
From this example, there is every reason in the world why I (and others) would think that this makes sense.
Unless there is something else to the trailing plug that I don't know about, it's existence is merely for emissions purpose, not performance.
Is this reason suffice?
#88
Originally posted by BATMAN
He did that for the 2 years that I knew him before he sold his FD for a 4 seater.
From this example, there is every reason in the world why I (and others) would think that this makes sense.
He did that for the 2 years that I knew him before he sold his FD for a 4 seater.
From this example, there is every reason in the world why I (and others) would think that this makes sense.
#90
That's exactly the point. I and a few others were equally impressed.
During those 2 years we secretly had these bets that he'll pop his engine soon.
But he didn't.
The mods that I can remember off the top of my head were:
Some stupid green "sponge" warm air intake
DP
MP
PFS Single tip catback
During those 2 years we secretly had these bets that he'll pop his engine soon.
But he didn't.
The mods that I can remember off the top of my head were:
Some stupid green "sponge" warm air intake
DP
MP
PFS Single tip catback
#91
Originally posted by BATMAN
I think Mazda knew about the elimination of the trailing plug and it's advantages, but they had the trailing plug to help complete the combustion process.
The result is a cleaner exhaust.
I think Mazda knew about the elimination of the trailing plug and it's advantages, but they had the trailing plug to help complete the combustion process.
The result is a cleaner exhaust.
You've got a far less than ideally shaped combustion chamber in an engine design that essentially completes the combustion process in the exhaust, wasting a considerable amount of power in the form of excessive heat and noise. The more air and fuel you can burn while the rotor is still on the "power stroke", the better, which is probably why the R26B has three plugs per housing. Completing combustion in the exhaust doesn't make any more power, it just makes the big fireballs at the tailpipe which seem to impress the ignorant...
#92
hmmm...cant wait to see how many people lose motors and blame it on their injectors....
remember when rikki got back from his pfs tuning session and blew it up...then blamed it on some oil in his intercooler. hahahah
the good fun. I hope this thread lives on forever. It is bringing out all the skeptics and even a few rotards.
j
remember when rikki got back from his pfs tuning session and blew it up...then blamed it on some oil in his intercooler. hahahah
the good fun. I hope this thread lives on forever. It is bringing out all the skeptics and even a few rotards.
j
#94
Originally posted by rxrotary2_7
so just leaving spark plugs inplace rather than spending the large amount on machined plugs DOES prove to no collect enough carbon buildup to be detrimential. i guess with this logic, changin these plugs along with the functioning ones would help in clearing up that pesky build-up problem...
so just leaving spark plugs inplace rather than spending the large amount on machined plugs DOES prove to no collect enough carbon buildup to be detrimential. i guess with this logic, changin these plugs along with the functioning ones would help in clearing up that pesky build-up problem...
he was only one example.
and could have been lucky.
i don't think that there will be any argument on carbon's role in detonation.
So with that in mind, I would rather spend the $$$ to do it "right" and use this device as opposed to leaving the plugs in.
#95
Originally posted by rxrotary2_7
so just leaving spark plugs inplace rather than spending the large amount on machined plugs DOES prove to no collect enough carbon buildup to be detrimential. i guess with this logic, changin these plugs along with the functioning ones would help in clearing up that pesky build-up problem...
also, good point Rx-7$4$me
so just leaving spark plugs inplace rather than spending the large amount on machined plugs DOES prove to no collect enough carbon buildup to be detrimential. i guess with this logic, changin these plugs along with the functioning ones would help in clearing up that pesky build-up problem...
also, good point Rx-7$4$me
Unless of course this mumbo jumbo about "red hot carbon deposits" is just a bunch of BS in that it can cause pre-ignition.
#96
Oh, and dont forget that with the "Anti- Detonaton Device" The EGT will be much higher if the motor is run at the higher A/F that was spoken of. This will result in heating that little "butt-plug" up till your *** is "carbon-deposit-pre-igniting" all over the place.
#97
Originally posted by jimlab
And more power.
You've got a far less than ideally shaped combustion chamber in an engine design that essentially completes the combustion process in the exhaust, wasting a considerable amount of power in the form of excessive heat and noise. The more air and fuel you can burn while the rotor is still on the "power stroke", the better, which is probably why the R26B has three plugs per housing. Completing combustion in the exhaust doesn't make any more power, it just makes the big fireballs at the tailpipe which seem to impress the ignorant...
And more power.
You've got a far less than ideally shaped combustion chamber in an engine design that essentially completes the combustion process in the exhaust, wasting a considerable amount of power in the form of excessive heat and noise. The more air and fuel you can burn while the rotor is still on the "power stroke", the better, which is probably why the R26B has three plugs per housing. Completing combustion in the exhaust doesn't make any more power, it just makes the big fireballs at the tailpipe which seem to impress the ignorant...
However, I this device should make up for the HP and TQ via a leaner A/F ratio.
From what I know here are what one may expect:
1. Install the device by itself and u don't gain HP.
2. Install the device and it gives u a greater degree of "safety" with regards to minimizing detonation.
#98
Originally posted by BATMAN
So what is ur point?
So what is ur point?
to translate:
"Were you TOLD/informed/clued-in/sent a "decoder ring" for a secret message played on the radio by Skip (or someone to do with the project) exactly what the magic behind it was? "
or
"Did you just have a gut feeling of what they were up to and just felt tha this was good topic to pretend that you knew something?"
#99
Originally posted by BATMAN
I can't be sure.
he was only one example.
and could have been lucky.
i don't think that there will be any argument on carbon's role in detonation.
So with that in mind, I would rather spend the $$$ to do it "right" and use this device as opposed to leaving the plugs in.
I can't be sure.
he was only one example.
and could have been lucky.
i don't think that there will be any argument on carbon's role in detonation.
So with that in mind, I would rather spend the $$$ to do it "right" and use this device as opposed to leaving the plugs in.