Anti Detonation Info - I hope this is a joke
#226
Originally posted by Jim Swantko
If you want to shut-up all us doubters - here's the best way to do it.
Get a bunch of people together at a dyno somewhere.
Put these "things" in your car.
Tune it to an A/F (or octane) that "should" make your Wankel spit it's apex seals - if it doesn't - then you can make claims.
Otherwise - it's just as impressive as the anti-detonation rock that I've been hearing so much about. haha
If you want to shut-up all us doubters - here's the best way to do it.
Get a bunch of people together at a dyno somewhere.
Put these "things" in your car.
Tune it to an A/F (or octane) that "should" make your Wankel spit it's apex seals - if it doesn't - then you can make claims.
Otherwise - it's just as impressive as the anti-detonation rock that I've been hearing so much about. haha
#230
Originally posted by BATMAN
I'm not aware of the price going up to $700.
can u show me that info?
I'm not aware of the price going up to $700.
can u show me that info?
#231
Originally posted by SPOautos
Carbon build up you say? So what, the entire rotor is covered in it anyway, whats a little more going to hurt lol
STEPHEN
Carbon build up you say? So what, the entire rotor is covered in it anyway, whats a little more going to hurt lol
STEPHEN
#232
[sarcasm]
We are working on a set of bushings to replace your stock rubber bushings with a top secret material I can't really tell you about becuase I'm getting a patent on it (no really I am!). These bushings completely eliminate wheel hop and let me have amazing '60 times on even a stock clutch, driveshaft, diff and rear axles with no risk of breaking!
I've got some people testing them now and once they're done we'll have them for sale....
(A year or so later)
Ok, I have a website now and you can buy the bushings, they're only $13,000 (seems fair, same markup % or so as the BP). So who wants a set?
Oh and in my totally stock '93 touring I ran a 1.154 '60 foot time on street tires with them, I just need to find my slip and I'll scan it really I will.
[/sarcasm]
While we're on the subject I've got a mircale diet drink to help everyone here who drinks milk, juice, soda, or any other beverage with calories lose weight. I'll give this one out free since I tried to get a patent on my secret technology but it was rejected Its called water and I think its about as revolutionary an idea as this is.
We are working on a set of bushings to replace your stock rubber bushings with a top secret material I can't really tell you about becuase I'm getting a patent on it (no really I am!). These bushings completely eliminate wheel hop and let me have amazing '60 times on even a stock clutch, driveshaft, diff and rear axles with no risk of breaking!
I've got some people testing them now and once they're done we'll have them for sale....
(A year or so later)
Ok, I have a website now and you can buy the bushings, they're only $13,000 (seems fair, same markup % or so as the BP). So who wants a set?
Oh and in my totally stock '93 touring I ran a 1.154 '60 foot time on street tires with them, I just need to find my slip and I'll scan it really I will.
[/sarcasm]
While we're on the subject I've got a mircale diet drink to help everyone here who drinks milk, juice, soda, or any other beverage with calories lose weight. I'll give this one out free since I tried to get a patent on my secret technology but it was rejected Its called water and I think its about as revolutionary an idea as this is.
#233
Steve,
I really don't think you understand what happened here. Maybe I can shed some light.
The problem started with the description of your product. Anti-detonation Device (AKA TrailPlug® device). Which led people to believe that it was something more than it really is.
It is misleading to call it a device.
Device: A contrivance or an invention serving a particular purpose, especially a machine used to perform one or more relatively simple tasks.
I would say that you actually have a component
component: A constituent element, as of a system. A part of a mechanical or electrical complex.
People were expecting a computer or something of that complex nature. So it was a big let down, especially charging $450 dollars for it, just screams greed (it's been stated over, and over). Even $100 dollars that's expensive. For what it is...
If you would had been completely honest that it was a rather simple product and that it would be offered at low cost (10%-20% profit) you would have people waiting in line to purchase it (if indeed it works). No need to jack up the prices since selling in bulk would yield you a greater profit margin. Your production cost plus a reasonable profit is what we should pay.
I really don't think you understand what happened here. Maybe I can shed some light.
The problem started with the description of your product. Anti-detonation Device (AKA TrailPlug® device). Which led people to believe that it was something more than it really is.
It is misleading to call it a device.
Device: A contrivance or an invention serving a particular purpose, especially a machine used to perform one or more relatively simple tasks.
I would say that you actually have a component
component: A constituent element, as of a system. A part of a mechanical or electrical complex.
People were expecting a computer or something of that complex nature. So it was a big let down, especially charging $450 dollars for it, just screams greed (it's been stated over, and over). Even $100 dollars that's expensive. For what it is...
If you would had been completely honest that it was a rather simple product and that it would be offered at low cost (10%-20% profit) you would have people waiting in line to purchase it (if indeed it works). No need to jack up the prices since selling in bulk would yield you a greater profit margin. Your production cost plus a reasonable profit is what we should pay.
Originally posted by Pg-Unlimited
What would people say to a group buy at a price people seem comfortable with? From what I've read thus far, price seems the major problem here, or at least the number one thing among others. Seems like $100~150 is what people would be comfortable with, let's go for a group buy. I would rather sell 20 at $100 then none at $450 right now until people start using and posting feedback.
Everyone is correct, I could have done this a lot better but I'm new to this so trial and error will be the name of the game. Skip and KDR still have their own product; you can still purchase this product from them, and works just as well. The product I'm offering is from another company that has nothing to do with Skip or KDR. I cannot comment on whether this product shares the same technology, I'm personally bound by the NDA I signed back in August of 2003 with Skip, which is still in effect today. Thing is, once I knew what the product was, finding another resource on it just needed time before finding another company that offers it.
Thanks,
Steven
What would people say to a group buy at a price people seem comfortable with? From what I've read thus far, price seems the major problem here, or at least the number one thing among others. Seems like $100~150 is what people would be comfortable with, let's go for a group buy. I would rather sell 20 at $100 then none at $450 right now until people start using and posting feedback.
Everyone is correct, I could have done this a lot better but I'm new to this so trial and error will be the name of the game. Skip and KDR still have their own product; you can still purchase this product from them, and works just as well. The product I'm offering is from another company that has nothing to do with Skip or KDR. I cannot comment on whether this product shares the same technology, I'm personally bound by the NDA I signed back in August of 2003 with Skip, which is still in effect today. Thing is, once I knew what the product was, finding another resource on it just needed time before finding another company that offers it.
Thanks,
Steven
#234
Originally posted by Rx-7$4$me
Because, as stated in my previous posts, this guy claims that all those carbon deposits start to glow red hot and cause pre-ignition. His solution is to stick a metal plug into the combustion area that must be made of some magic material that doesnt heat up
Because, as stated in my previous posts, this guy claims that all those carbon deposits start to glow red hot and cause pre-ignition. His solution is to stick a metal plug into the combustion area that must be made of some magic material that doesnt heat up
I didn't ask in details on what the tips are coated with.
Then again that might be proprietary info so no one copies it
#236
Originally posted by montego
Steve,
I really don't think you understand what happened here. Maybe I can shed some light.
The problem started with the description of your product. Anti-detonation Device (AKA TrailPlug® device). Which led people to believe that it was something more than it really is.
It is misleading to call it a device.
Device: A contrivance or an invention serving a particular purpose, especially a machine used to perform one or more relatively simple tasks.
I would say that you actually have a component
component: A constituent element, as of a system. A part of a mechanical or electrical complex.
People were expecting a computer or something of that complex nature. So it was a big let down, especially charging $450 dollars for it, just screams greed (it's been stated over, and over). Even $100 dollars that's expensive. For what it is...
If you would had been completely honest that it was a rather simple product and that it would be offered at low cost (10%-20% profit) you would have people waiting in line to purchase it (if indeed it works). No need to jack up the prices since selling in bulk would yield you a greater profit margin. Your production cost plus a reasonable profit is what we should pay.
Steve,
I really don't think you understand what happened here. Maybe I can shed some light.
The problem started with the description of your product. Anti-detonation Device (AKA TrailPlug® device). Which led people to believe that it was something more than it really is.
It is misleading to call it a device.
Device: A contrivance or an invention serving a particular purpose, especially a machine used to perform one or more relatively simple tasks.
I would say that you actually have a component
component: A constituent element, as of a system. A part of a mechanical or electrical complex.
People were expecting a computer or something of that complex nature. So it was a big let down, especially charging $450 dollars for it, just screams greed (it's been stated over, and over). Even $100 dollars that's expensive. For what it is...
If you would had been completely honest that it was a rather simple product and that it would be offered at low cost (10%-20% profit) you would have people waiting in line to purchase it (if indeed it works). No need to jack up the prices since selling in bulk would yield you a greater profit margin. Your production cost plus a reasonable profit is what we should pay.
#237
Originally posted by BATMAN
I believe it's the same metal as the engine block and the tips are coated.
I didn't ask in details on what the tips are coated with.
Then again that might be proprietary info so no one copies it
I believe it's the same metal as the engine block and the tips are coated.
I didn't ask in details on what the tips are coated with.
Then again that might be proprietary info so no one copies it
#239
Originally posted by BATMAN
Keep in mind that making $$$ selling rx7 parts is tough since it's a niche of a niche market and represents a small sale.
Keep in mind that making $$$ selling rx7 parts is tough since it's a niche of a niche market and represents a small sale.
#240
Originally posted by Rx-7$4$me
A miracle! Some information is released. Even if it were to be coated, just seeing him claim pre-ignition from hot carbon and then offering a solution by shoving a piece of metal into the housing, which in itself will be a hot spot, is just humerous.
A miracle! Some information is released. Even if it were to be coated, just seeing him claim pre-ignition from hot carbon and then offering a solution by shoving a piece of metal into the housing, which in itself will be a hot spot, is just humerous.
Look at upgraded intercoolers.
Sure, it will lower temps and help reduce kaboom, but it's no guarantee.
water injectors, upgrade injectors, fuel pumps, etc that makes the engine less likely to go kaboom are never guaranteed.
so if that statement was present on these aforementioned products would that hinder u from buying them?
or would u buy it knowing that poor tuning and fuel system failures can still cause kaboom, but on the flip side, it provides significant safeties in preventing u from dropping in another engine?
Once, again I think we should turn our attention to testing this and not so much on the nay-saying.
#241
Originally posted by WHIPSrx7
Okay. I don't get how some people compare this new product to just unplugging a plug or throwing a bolt in the plug hole. The difference is that this fires three times from two plugs (like it has three plugs). How is that at all like just unplugging a plug. I don't see how it's the same thing.
If you unplug a plug, the plug that is still in the housing will only fire once (so, it will be firing one time for one plug v. firing three times for two plugs). This attack does not make sense at all. I'm sorry.
Okay. I don't get how some people compare this new product to just unplugging a plug or throwing a bolt in the plug hole. The difference is that this fires three times from two plugs (like it has three plugs). How is that at all like just unplugging a plug. I don't see how it's the same thing.
If you unplug a plug, the plug that is still in the housing will only fire once (so, it will be firing one time for one plug v. firing three times for two plugs). This attack does not make sense at all. I'm sorry.
Are there any pictures of it from inside the rotor housing? I'd like to see how well it actually 'seals' (does not allow a place for deposits to build up).
#242
Originally posted by montego
That statement applies to the FD only. This "product" applies to all rotaries. Not such a niche market after all.
That statement applies to the FD only. This "product" applies to all rotaries. Not such a niche market after all.
rotary cars are a niche of that.
#243
Originally posted by WHIPSrx7
Okay. I don't get how some people compare this new product to just unplugging a plug or throwing a bolt in the plug hole. The difference is that this fires three times from two plugs (like it has three plugs). How is that at all like just unplugging a plug. I don't see how it's the same thing.
Okay. I don't get how some people compare this new product to just unplugging a plug or throwing a bolt in the plug hole. The difference is that this fires three times from two plugs (like it has three plugs). How is that at all like just unplugging a plug. I don't see how it's the same thing.
There will be THREE sparks per chamber per rotation CYCLE, but one per rotor face. Even without reading the webpage, you could've gathered that from the context clues of what everybody is posting.
edit: well, i'm talking about usable spark....not that wasted spark when the other rotor is igniting from the same coil.
#244
Originally posted by BATMAN
sport cars are a niche market of the auto industry.
rotary cars are a niche of that.
sport cars are a niche market of the auto industry.
rotary cars are a niche of that.
http://www.atkinsrotary.com/store/cu...cat=503&page=1
Bottom line the price is not justified. Yes indeed it may do wonders for the car but then so does an apex seal .
I'm beginning to think that you are somehow making money on this.
#245
Originally posted by dclin
My impression is that this device does nothing at all (mechanically or electrically), except 'seal' the hole where the trailing plug would have gone. It doesn't 'fire' at all. So in essence, it is just a 'plug'. Am I mistaken, or did I not understand your post correctly?
Are there any pictures of it from inside the rotor housing? I'd like to see how well it actually 'seals' (does not allow a place for deposits to build up).
My impression is that this device does nothing at all (mechanically or electrically), except 'seal' the hole where the trailing plug would have gone. It doesn't 'fire' at all. So in essence, it is just a 'plug'. Am I mistaken, or did I not understand your post correctly?
Are there any pictures of it from inside the rotor housing? I'd like to see how well it actually 'seals' (does not allow a place for deposits to build up).
#246
Originally posted by montego
Then why can I find Apex seals for $39.95?
http://www.atkinsrotary.com/store/cu...cat=503&page=1
Bottom line the price is not justified. Yes indeed it may do wonders for the car but then so does an apex seal .
I'm beginning to think that you are somehow making money on this.
Then why can I find Apex seals for $39.95?
http://www.atkinsrotary.com/store/cu...cat=503&page=1
Bottom line the price is not justified. Yes indeed it may do wonders for the car but then so does an apex seal .
I'm beginning to think that you are somehow making money on this.
#247
Hehe, actually FD's are the easiest people to sell to in the rotary world because (wait for it) they have much more money than FC or FB owners. There aren't a ton of FC's and FB's around the boards with 20K in them - a fw but not many ans I suspect that there are a bunch of FD's here with nearly 20K in mods.
Just because selling a product for a niche market is "hard" doesn't mean that you make a 1000% profit margin on a product (and I have a feeling I'm not far off here) to make up for your lack of sales/business skilss.
Just because selling a product for a niche market is "hard" doesn't mean that you make a 1000% profit margin on a product (and I have a feeling I'm not far off here) to make up for your lack of sales/business skilss.
#248
Originally posted by BATMAN
that could be a "standard" disclaimer.
Look at upgraded intercoolers.
Sure, it will lower temps and help reduce kaboom, but it's no guarantee.
water injectors, upgrade injectors, fuel pumps, etc that makes the engine less likely to go kaboom are never guaranteed.
so if that statement was present on these aforementioned products would that hinder u from buying them?
or would u buy it knowing that poor tuning and fuel system failures can still cause kaboom, but on the flip side, it provides significant safeties in preventing u from dropping in another engine?
Once, again I think we should turn our attention to testing this and not so much on the nay-saying.
that could be a "standard" disclaimer.
Look at upgraded intercoolers.
Sure, it will lower temps and help reduce kaboom, but it's no guarantee.
water injectors, upgrade injectors, fuel pumps, etc that makes the engine less likely to go kaboom are never guaranteed.
so if that statement was present on these aforementioned products would that hinder u from buying them?
or would u buy it knowing that poor tuning and fuel system failures can still cause kaboom, but on the flip side, it provides significant safeties in preventing u from dropping in another engine?
Once, again I think we should turn our attention to testing this and not so much on the nay-saying.
I understand what your saying, but all of those products do not point out an inherent flaw in the Rotary motor and suggest a solution that if looked at closely ( actually its blatently obvious), is just the original problem but could have a higher degree of severity.
There are so many questions as you were saying in this thread that suggest the product to be crap. It was a poor decision to not release any testing information before hand. Plain and simple.
#250
Originally posted by Hyperite
well, i'm talking about usable spark....not that wasted spark when the other rotor is igniting from the same coil.
well, i'm talking about usable spark....not that wasted spark when the other rotor is igniting from the same coil.