3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Ackk! Aftermarket Flywheel Bolt stretch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-05, 06:52 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
PVerdieck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ackk! Aftermarket Flywheel Bolt stretch

OK. Doing clutch and flywheel job on FD. Act flywheel and spec clutch. Was tightening up the ACT bolts provided for bolting on to the counterweight.

The pieces of junk stretched. I was using a torque wrench with clicking/popping for set torque. It was tested on a wheel nut and worked.

So now I need to find a source of high tension bolts to use.

Will the automatic flex plate bolts work? Are they long enough?

If not, what are my options? McMaster-Carr?

I was attempting to torque to 76 lbs (low side listed in manual for attaching bolts to drive plate).

This blows.
Old 09-11-05, 03:28 AM
  #2  
Junior Member

 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
McMaster should have some good stuff, you could also try Ababa Bolts.
Old 09-11-05, 08:34 AM
  #3  
Need more sleep

iTrader: (1)
 
twokrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodlands TX
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
That's very weird. What torque value were you using?
Old 09-11-05, 10:47 AM
  #4  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
PVerdieck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I said, we used 76 lbs.

That is the low value, specified on page K-157, auto trans, drive plate attachment, torque 76-81 lbs.

I will call APR tomorrow, to see if they over M10, 1.25, .75 shank length bolts
I will also go to the dealer, and see how the stock auto trans ones look.

Last edited by PVerdieck; 09-11-05 at 10:49 AM.
Old 09-11-05, 11:31 AM
  #5  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
I'll need to look again, but I don't remember those bolts being torqued that high. Usually those size are around 40-44 ft/lbs.
Old 09-11-05, 04:47 PM
  #6  
Old School

 
Matt Hey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Baldwin City, KS
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Mahjik. I think the torque spec should be about 40 ft/lbs. Another place for bolts...

http://www.boltdepot.com/

Be sure to get 10.9 grade bolts.
Old 09-11-05, 09:30 PM
  #7  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
PVerdieck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
40 lbs? Holding down a 12 lb flywheel on one side and a X lb counterweight on the other?

We were also using blue loctite on them.
Old 09-11-05, 09:39 PM
  #8  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
PVerdieck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
n/t
Old 09-11-05, 09:46 PM
  #9  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by PVerdieck
40 lbs? Holding down a 12 lb flywheel on one side and a X lb counterweight on the other?

We were also using blue loctite on them.
Considering the engine studs themselves are around around 28 ft/lbs stock, yea that's about right.

IIRC, my Racing Beat FW had all the torque specs with it and I know they weren't that high (70'ish that is). Heck, the bolts for the pressure plate are only like 20 ft/lbs.
Old 09-12-05, 10:13 AM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
KevinK2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,209
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
My RB flywheel instructions said 28 ft lbs, with lower values for the pressure plate.

28 ft-lbs gets you about 5000 lbs preload per bolt at about 55 ksi stress. Gr 8.8 has a min yield of 96 ksi.

I thought there were (6) M10 bolts ... that would be 30,000 lbs of clamping force. Sounds like enough ....

Over torquing with mega strength bolts could strip the tapped holes.
Old 09-12-05, 10:49 AM
  #11  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by KevinK2
My RB flywheel instructions said 28 ft lbs, with lower values for the pressure plate.
That sounds about right (although I used around 30 ft lbs). Glad you had the RB instructions handy.
Old 09-12-05, 12:30 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so when bolting on a LWFW each bolt should be torqued @ about 28lbs?
Old 09-13-05, 09:16 AM
  #13  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
PVerdieck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, I buy what you guys are saying. I also called Jason, and the tech at his shop is using 28-30 lbs.

IN OUR DEFENSE:


P. K-157
Old 09-13-05, 12:00 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
KevinW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so why does that say 76-81 lb
Old 09-13-05, 12:14 PM
  #15  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by KevinW
so why does that say 76-81 lb
Because it's not exactly the same parts. Those doesn't always transfer over to aftermarket parts (as I found out with my strut replacement one day ).

I'm surprised ACT doesn't have a sheet with torque specs with their flywheel/counterweight bolts like Racing Beat.
Old 09-13-05, 03:20 PM
  #16  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
KevinK2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,209
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
http://www.iluvmyrx7.com/

both 93 and 94 manual pdf's spec it at 32-44 ft-lbs

could be fsm error, or wrong fsm?
Old 09-14-05, 06:32 PM
  #17  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
PVerdieck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
must be a FSM error.

from my 94 RX-7 Factory Workshop Manual, copyright 1993.
Old 09-14-05, 11:06 PM
  #18  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
KevinK2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,209
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
in my 93 fsm, right on pg C-81, wrong on K-157.
Old 09-15-05, 07:42 AM
  #19  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
PVerdieck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-82 correct for me. Thanks.
Old 09-15-05, 08:10 AM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
ArcWelder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess not exactly wrong on K-157 as that is probably the correct torque spec for the drive plate with an automatic transmission. It's not the correct flywheel/counterweight torque spec for the manual trans.

Anyhow, for replacement high quality hardware I use Maryland Metrics.

http://mdmetric.com/

Originally Posted by KevinK2
in my 93 fsm, right on pg C-81, wrong on K-157.
Old 09-15-05, 10:22 AM
  #21  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
KevinK2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,209
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
the manual flywheel and counterweight are one piece, no 6 cap screws means no torque spec. K-157 refers to atx, and is wrong.
Old 09-15-05, 11:50 AM
  #22  
Vagina Junction

 
Hyperite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did 45 ft/lbs for my ACT SS
Old 09-15-05, 12:45 PM
  #23  
Senior Member

 
ArcWelder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, got your point. Manual is conflicting on torque spec for auto trans from C-81 (corrrect) to K-157 (incorrect). No torque spec stock, man trans vs. aftermarket seperate flywheel and counterweight so use correct torque spec from page C-81 for auto trans.

Originally Posted by KevinK2
the manual flywheel and counterweight are one piece, no 6 cap screws means no torque spec. K-157 refers to atx, and is wrong.
Old 09-15-05, 04:39 PM
  #24  
Full Member

 
jdtanksley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went throught the same thing when I swapped out my clutch and flywheel. I found out the hard way that the specs listed at not correct. I found the same picture in two different places in the factory manual, each having very different numbers. I think someone got confused about which numbers they were starting out with in that particular picture when they were doing their N-m, kgf-m, ft-lb conversions.
Old 09-20-05, 09:22 PM
  #25  
Junior Member

 
ACTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: lancaster, ca
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just to confirm the numbers you were using are wrong, we suggest 45-50 ftlbs. There is no way they would use 80ftlbs for 10mm bolts so it must be an error. The bolts provided are grade 10.9 which aint bad. I thought there were instructions with torque specs provided, but if not, I apologize.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Enzo1944
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
09-06-15 08:57 AM



Quick Reply: Ackk! Aftermarket Flywheel Bolt stretch



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 PM.