99 spec rear spoiler
#1
99 spec rear spoiler
Hey guys I want your opinion. Should I put on the 99 spec rear spoiler if we don't consider $$. Will it look good on a red 93 wit stock rims? Also what about the 99 spec front chin spoiler? Im thinking of getting both, but do you guys think it will look nice or too extreme?
#3
Trending Topics
#9
#10
Rotary Master
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 356
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere
#15
p.s. I just bought this wing, for basically the same reasons, and to match my new 99 front end Unfortunately I have to get it painted as the J-spec silver is different from the US silver.
p.s.s. One look at the math you did reminded me why I became a lawyer.
#17
XSTransAM: ROTFLMAO! Yeah that was prolly me. The once a month I actually break the car out fo the garage and I get busted!
And yes there is a difference in the two wings RB vs '99 Mazda. Define huge. IMO yes.
Scott,
From what i noted off the video where I got the data is they attributed most of the aero benefits to the 99 splitter **AND** the 99 undertray. Yes the undertray!
And keep in mind these were only rough calcs and any time you screw with ride height and rake the aero is going to change significantly. Pls with my vented hood I'm sure the calcs differ..they were only doen to illustrate some benefits fo the '99 hardware I guess.
And yes there is a difference in the two wings RB vs '99 Mazda. Define huge. IMO yes.
Scott,
From what i noted off the video where I got the data is they attributed most of the aero benefits to the 99 splitter **AND** the 99 undertray. Yes the undertray!
And keep in mind these were only rough calcs and any time you screw with ride height and rake the aero is going to change significantly. Pls with my vented hood I'm sure the calcs differ..they were only doen to illustrate some benefits fo the '99 hardware I guess.
#20
Originally posted by CrispyRX7
...most of the aero benefits to the 99 splitter **AND** the 99 undertray...
...most of the aero benefits to the 99 splitter **AND** the 99 undertray...
#23
Originally posted by XSTransAm
Is their a huge difference in design between the 99 and the racing beat type 2?
Is their a huge difference in design between the 99 and the racing beat type 2?
#24
RB - fiberglass(is it? I assume yes); OE - urethane (difference - yes)
RB - non adjustable; OE - adjustable (to some, myself included this is the HUGE difference. For the casual street driver this particular difference is transparent. I track my car regularly so to me yes the difference is HUGE. And possibly the added expense is in the hardware necessary to facilitate the adjustability.
RB - functional: yes probably?; OE - functional: without question.
So it depends on your needs...cost not withstanding.
FWIW
Crispy
RB - non adjustable; OE - adjustable (to some, myself included this is the HUGE difference. For the casual street driver this particular difference is transparent. I track my car regularly so to me yes the difference is HUGE. And possibly the added expense is in the hardware necessary to facilitate the adjustability.
RB - functional: yes probably?; OE - functional: without question.
So it depends on your needs...cost not withstanding.
FWIW
Crispy
#25
Originally posted by Coulthard Fan
I'm getting the new undertray as well, but having a hard time finding one in the US. Didn't even know it was improved for aero effect, so that's a bonus I guess.
I'm getting the new undertray as well, but having a hard time finding one in the US. Didn't even know it was improved for aero effect, so that's a bonus I guess.
I am not sure what the difference is between the two as the bottoms are identical. The only difference is the splitter part that seals against the radiator. If you cut that off of the 93-96's then it looks exactly the same as the 99.