3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

13B Sequential vs. Non-sequential vs. 20B !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-03 | 08:09 PM
  #1  
homie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member

 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
13B Sequential vs. Non-sequential vs. 20B !!!

This aught to be interesting....I'm trying to increase my output but maintain a daily driver (good response and limited lag). I'd also like to keep a sequential but it sounds near impossible to do so and get to 450-500 rwhp. That said, I'm now considering a non-sequential set up but don't know what their limitations are (RWHP, drivability, lag, and cost). My ultimate option is a 20B, but I don't think that's too realistic given the cost. Can anyone help !!! Thanks....
Old 06-30-03 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
r0gu3's Avatar
Boostless FD
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
20B > *
Old 06-30-03 | 09:31 PM
  #3  
911GT2's Avatar
The Power of 1.3
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 0
From: Shrewsbury, Massachusetts
With an open exhaust (mp included) you can get full boost by about 3800 rpm. Lag is very minimal, and power output can hit 400 rwhp. If you want more, get a single.
Old 06-30-03 | 09:38 PM
  #4  
Full Member

 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, South Carolina
non-sequential 20B
Old 06-30-03 | 10:10 PM
  #5  
homie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member

 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
911GT2, is that a non-seq you're referring to or a seq. twin set up?
Old 07-01-03 | 12:25 AM
  #6  
1 BAD 7's Avatar
Love ya, pops!
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Home
I would imagine non-seq.

Originally posted by homie
911GT2, is that a non-seq you're referring to or a seq. twin set up?
Old 07-01-03 | 01:56 AM
  #7  
DrunkenBowler's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
From: STL Area
Just get the bnr stage 3 upgrade for the turbos, downpipe, etc... and you'll be fine.
Old 07-01-03 | 05:15 AM
  #8  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,580
Likes: 567
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Re: 13B Sequential vs. Non-sequential vs. 20B !!!

Originally posted by homie
This aught to be interesting....I'm trying to increase my output but maintain a daily driver (good response and limited lag). I'd also like to keep a sequential but it sounds near impossible to do so and get to 450-500 rwhp. That said, I'm now considering a non-sequential set up but don't know what their limitations are (RWHP, drivability, lag, and cost). My ultimate option is a 20B, but I don't think that's too realistic given the cost. Can anyone help !!! Thanks....
Sounds like you want my setup . I'm dynoing any day now. Should make well over 400 rwhp at 17 psi on pump gas. I have a crx, but the FD is certainly capable of being a daily driver. I'm running parallel but with the dynamic seals (stage 3 BNRs) boost response is outstanding for parallel turbos. Car is perfectly well behaved around town and you have instant power above 3k rpms, full boost (traction-busting power) from around 3700 on up.

Do a search under my username and 'BNR' if you want to read more .
Old 07-01-03 | 11:19 PM
  #9  
homie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member

 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
GoodfellaFD3S, thanks. I'll drop you a message.

Homie
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
39
10-04-15 08:47 PM
stickmantijuana
20B Forum
9
09-22-15 07:39 PM
chiefmg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
09-10-15 07:46 AM



Quick Reply: 13B Sequential vs. Non-sequential vs. 20B !!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.